deducer
Bronze Member
- Jan 7, 2014
- 2,284
- 4,378
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Preponderance of evidence……meaning more likely than not……..
(a) A Jesuit party of sojourners hid mines and/or caches in the mountains. They carved stone maps with broken and misspelled Spanish wording detailing the locations. They buried those stone maps for a later initiate to follow to the secret locations. But no such initiate took up the task.
(b) A party of Peralta miners worked mines in the mountains and found themselves under duress from hostile Natives. They hurriedly carved maps in broken and misspelled Spanish wording and buried them for unknown uninformed later discoverers to follow. The original carvers died at the hands of hostile Natives.
(c) A party of Peralta miners carved maps in stone with broken and misspelled Spanish writing leading to locations familiar to them in the mountains and before returning to Mexico buried them at the foot of those mountains to (a) retrieve at a later time; or (b) be retrieved by others they informed of their location.
(d) An American born Texan with an elementary education, a background of carving in stone with an artistic flare, and a family history of Spanish treasure hunting and map collection carved a set of stones with broken and misspelled Spanish wording depicting land marks in an area known for early Spanish/Mexican mineral exploration. Said stones may or may not be a duplication of existing map(s) or a compilation of existing maps.
If you walked into this story fresh today without a prejudice one way or the other, which story has the preponderance of evidence? That's before we even get into the he said, she said part of the discussion.
or (e) which is by far my favorite: