Hal Croves
Silver Member
There was another, younger "Dutchman" who was also a miner. Just curious.
The U of A collection almost certainly had samples from Waltz's former claims in the Bradshaws, and their letter stated there were no matches. <cut>
"Almost certainly" ... "no matches"? Please support these allegations with facts.
You asked when you began this thread, "Is there any evidence"? So far ... no, just a good story. You're doing yeoman's work trying to convince the readers (too bad you're not getting paid by the word!), but sometimes it seems more like you're trying to convince yourself.
There was another, younger "Dutchman" who was also a miner. Just curious.
Oro ---------->View attachment 1160650
Sdcfia wrote
Posted previously, see Helen Corbin's book "The Curse of the Dutchman's Gold" pp 231-234, and also pp 30, where she states that Corbin and Kollenborn were shown the letter not merely told of it. The statements you will find there are not "almost certainly" and you can read for yourself. Sworn affidavits of course are "just a good story" for you I suppose.
Roy, take a close look at those affidavits again when you get a chance. Despite what Helen says on p 30, nowhere in the affidavits do Bob or Tom swear to seeing that letter/document from the University.
In reality, there's very little Bob and Tom swore to in those affidavits other than that they were told things by an AZ businessman and saw documents pertaining to ore assays and shipping papers.
There's more evidence for this one than there is for the Lost Cabin. You either believe or you don't. Do the math and work on the clues.
roy...i'm not trying to discourage anyone from hunting the ldm...i'm just trying to discourage them from following those stupid clues that have been floating around for 100 years and from wasting their lives trying to figure out those stone maps...i say the mine has already been found..thats my opinion and alot of others also...you keep needling me trying to get me to post on here who found the mine...that aint gonna happen roy.....if he wants to say something he will....i dont post stuff like that on a public forum.....matter of fact i cant believe you dont already know...most folks here do...if you come to the rendezvous and ask a few questions you will find the answers you seek...there are a few on this forum that knowAgreed! I am always surprised at how many treasure hunters we have here, whom are trying to discourage others from hunting for the LDM. If it never existed or was found and all cleaned out, what harm is there in looking for it? If it was found and all cleaned out, why not let everyone know exactly where it is (or was) so they can go after other lost treasures?
I think I made a mistake in an earlier post too, mentioning the Grose Lode mine as one of Jacob Waltz's claims. I think that one had the name of Jacob WEISS and was thought by some researchers to be Jacob Weiser. But I don't have that document in hand so can't check. Anyway may have that one wrong. The Big Rebel and General Grant are definitely Waltz's claims, proving he was a prospector and successful at that, not just a chicken farmer.
edit - forgot to add that Jacob Waltz listed his occupation on the 1864 Territorial Census as a "Miner", and that he had worked as a miner in California on the San Gabriel river for a man named Ruben Blakney (spelling corrections welcome). He was 60 years old when he filed on the homestead in Phoenix, with a fairly good career as a prospector and miner behind him by that time.
roy...i'm not trying to discourage anyone from hunting the ldm...i'm just trying to discourage them from following those stupid clues that have been floating around for 100 years and from wasting their lives trying to figure out those stone maps...i say the mine has already been found..thats my opinion and alot of others also...you keep needling me trying to get me to post on here who found the mine...that aint gonna happen roy.....if he wants to say something he will....i dont post stuff like that on a public forum.....matter of fact i cant believe you dont already know...most folks here do...if you come to the rendezvous and ask a few questions you will find the answers you seek...there are a few on this forum that know
Funny... most of the early Bradshaw mines/claims/prospects were discovered in the 1850's. As you well know many of the "rich" mines and placer claims played out in a relatively short time period. U of A wasn't even a blip on the radar until 1885, and even then the "mineral department" was established until 1892. So given Waltz had claims/mines in the Bradshaws during the mid 1860's, I highly doubt any of his ore samples from any of his mines ever made it to the U of A sample library as it wasn't even a school yet... unless of course the Dutchman was a time traveler also.According to those affidavits our skeptics don't like, the U of A had specimens from every known mine in AZ.
exactly my point....there are so many discrepancies in the ldm saga i dont think anyone will ever be able to prove anything....but there are alot of other goodies to find if you get out and lookI think I do know exactly whom you are talking about. I have NO doubt that he believes he found the LDM and cleaned it all out. There are several different people who believe they found the LDM and cleaned it all out, and each of them has made a nice chunk of money doing it. One place fits a number of those clues too. I just don't believe they found the LDM, I believe they found a nice pocket of gold in an old silver mine. The clues or most of them apply to the Peralta story, and really should not be linked to Waltz at all. That is what I have been saying. I am not meaning to be needling YOU in particular, for I know of several people here that know the guys involved in these three 'LDM' gold digging deals, and it has been long enough now that there is no danger of prosecution. Heck one of them even hinted at it directly on national TV. "Ha ha" he said to the camera. You know exactly who I am talking about, heck you could drive to his place in probably a half hour. There is nothing for him to fear at this point, and I think it is great he made good - but I don't believe the gold he got, came from the mine of Jacob Waltz. There are signs of gold and silver veins over a lot of ground in those mountains and you know that from putting your own boots on the ground. Most of them are either not rich enough or too small to be worth the bother, but the fact there IS gold there, is a good sign to keep looking. Heck Sarge has been showing people the gold he found in the Superstitions, proving there IS gold to be found, if anyone is willing to go dig for it.
One other thing - when someone goes out hunting for a lost treasure or mine, the fact that he (or she) is out there hunting, gives them a fair chance to find something great. More than one good gold or silver mine has been found by someone looking for a lost mine, and while they did not find the one they were looking for, if you get a nice wad of cash out of it who cares? Dave knows this, but for our readers, when you go out treasure hunting, you never know just what you might find! No one ever found a gold mine while watching TV.
Funny... most of the early Bradshaw mines/claims/prospects were discovered in the 1850's. As you well know many of the "rich" mines and placer claims played out in a relatively short time period. U of A wasn't even a blip on the radar until 1885, and even then the "mineral department" was established until 1892. So given Waltz had claims/mines in the Bradshaws during the mid 1860's, I highly doubt any of his ore samples from any of his mines ever made it to the U of A sample library as it wasn't even a school yet... unless of course the Dutchman was a time traveler also.
from Premiminary Report of a Reconnaisance through Southern and Southeastern Nevada, US Army Corps of Engineers, 1875, page 55 (the chapter is on explorations in Arizona, despite the title)Walnut Grove District, Arizona
None of the veins are being worked now in this district; no water for past two seasons. Principal mines: Sutler, Blue Jay,. Big Rebel, Josephine, Robinson, and Crescent Lead.
<snip>
3. Big Rebel - Opened by a tunnel; gold-bearing quartz in slate formation; lode 12 feet thick; course of vein, northeast and southwest; assays $37 gold per ton.