Hal Croves
Silver Member
- Sep 25, 2010
- 2,659
- 2,697
Good points Springfield! The question that popped into my head about the term "anomalous" was anomalous as compared to what? In my work, we test our product all the time and have a good idea what the baseline results are for every element we test for. When we get a sample that for some reason has an element outside of our upper or lower limits (based on our baseline testing), we would call that anomalous and look for a source for that cause. In this case, I guess I don't know whether they have some type of baseline values to compare against or not.
I don't think Hal is using these results as a clear indicator that he is on to something with his theory. I think it is just one in a line of data to help him flesh out his theory and test it.
I agree that there may very well be issues with the sampling in this case, so I too would probably not consider anything conclusive from this. It is something interesting to look into though.
Cubfan64,
If the "data" is what Springfield is asking for please let me know. Its a bit Greek... no offense markmar!
Yes, nothing "conclusive", but enough to establish a realistic possibility.