Another article on this very issue:
Article in Diario de Sevilla
SPANISH STAND ON ODYSSEY VINDICATED, SAYS JOSE PONS
Jose Pons (right) with Chief Minister Peter Caruana last year. Pic: Johnny Bugeja
Former Spanish Director General for Europe and Madrid negotiator at the Tripartite Forum Jose Pons, has declared that Spain’s stand on the Odyssey treasure hunt affair has been vindicated by the ruling from the US Judge investigating the case.
Writing in the Diario de Sevilla at the weekend, Sr Pons says that the US tribunal has finally recognised that the Odyssey treasure had come from the Spanish sovereign vessel Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes.
“The tribunal has accepted that the ship belongs to a sovereign state, is subject to immunity, and that the company will have to return the treasure to its rightful owner, Spain,” he writes.
Under the heading “The truth about Odyssey,” Sr Pons has described the ruling as a great success for those who have defended the case on behalf of Spanish interests and welcomes that “truth has prevailed over the treasure hunters.”
Sr Pons says that the judge’s ruling in recognising the identity of the frigate Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes, that was sunk in 1804 in the Atlantic, in international waters near Cape Saint Vincent, had completely brought crashing down theories that purported to place the treasure site in the Mediterranean, off the coast of Estepona, in Spanish waters, near where the English vessel Sussex is reportedly located.
The Spanish diplomat who is currently in Vienna, takes issue with statements made by journalists Pipe Sarmiento and Santiago Mata, who argued that the company had tricked Spain “and that it had taken the treasure from right in front of our noses.
“Will they now have the courage to recognise that they made a mistake,” asks Sr Pons, who includes the newspaper El Faro in the list of those who had “vilified and insulted, and insinuated false connivance between Spanish Foreign Ministry officials and Odyssey.”
“Will they now apologise for having written totally unfounded nonsense and for making claims that the Spanish Foreign Ministry was lying or hiding information,” asks Sr Pons.
“The fact is we knew what was going on thanks to exhaustive monitoring by the Spanish navy, that the Odyssey Explorer and the Ocean Alert had spent enough time at the site of Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes, to rescue the treasure.”
Sr Pons says that much was written about alleged Spanish incompetence in defending its marine archaeological heritage, and that experts suddenly appeared attacking Spain’s alleged inaction.
Sr Pons says that while this was happening, the Spanish administration was working diligently to defend the cause, “knowing that we had not done anything wrong and that justice was on our side.”
“It is very clear,” he says “that since Odyssey was unable to rescue the Sussex because it did not meet the conditions by the Junta de Andalucia and was unable elude to Spanish law enforcers, it moved to the Atlantic to rescue the treasure from the Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes, whose location it already knew.”
“As it needed to increase the value of its shares it was incapable of keeping the secret. It had to say it publicly, that was their great mistake.”
Sr Pons adds that two years after the event and having suffered “the constant harassment from certain sectors of the media, I am satisfied that we must have done something right so that the judge has ruled in favour of Spain.”
And he concludes: “We should now demand from the British Government their responsibility in this. Without the storage facilities and protection in a Gibraltar military zone and without the licences and the active or passive complicity of the Gibraltarian local authorities, Odyssey would never have been able to appropriate itself of the treasure and to subsequently transport it to the US.”
Pirate Diver
< BACK