I'm sickened that I have to explain to you that YOU need to read it again. The Ben Franklin on the money was not even living in America when that bank was founded, nor was he living here for years after it was founded so he could NOT have been a founder of that bank, nor a stock holder. This is what I have asked about Robot explaining his theory, which he did not, and then, since you claimed to understand it it, I asked you to explain it and...now we all see that you can't either. I know you said you do not agree with his theory so, I get that. But I guess you can't explain how old Ben could found a bank and be an original stock holder when he was living in Europe at that time?
This was my question asked many times now and still it is not answered.
Bill