EE THr
Silver Member
- Thread starter
- #1,341
My thoughts on suggesting this "reverse engineering" method include several aspects.
One is that the Stone Maps are often referred to as the "Peralta" Stone Maps.
Taking that as one example to look at, the question would be "Were the maps to be read only by other members of the Peralta family?" If the answer is yes, then that would mean that either all their members, or at least the major members of their family, would be readily able to read the maps.
If this is so, then the next question would be, "How unique would this code have been?" That is, would this code be readable only by members of the Peralta family? Or would the code be common to a wider group of people? This then results in two following questions---
1. What would the wider group have been? A religious group? A secred society group? A geographic group? Or some other category of group?
2. If only the Peralta family, then the map maker would need to give this unique code to each of them---and if that is the case, then why not just tell that small group of people where it is, rather than codifying it on stone maps and going to all that fuss and bother?
Obviously, somebody besides the maker would have known exactly what all the symbols meant, otherwise the maps would have no real use.
Who could possibly have known exactly what all of the symbols meant?
The more people who would have known the code, the more likely that someone outside the group would have found it out, and possibly made it public. (Also, the larger the group who could de-code the stone maps, the more likely that the knowledge would be successfully passed on, and that they would have already recovered whatever the maps lead to.)
How large of a group were the maps likely to have been directed to?
One is that the Stone Maps are often referred to as the "Peralta" Stone Maps.
Taking that as one example to look at, the question would be "Were the maps to be read only by other members of the Peralta family?" If the answer is yes, then that would mean that either all their members, or at least the major members of their family, would be readily able to read the maps.
If this is so, then the next question would be, "How unique would this code have been?" That is, would this code be readable only by members of the Peralta family? Or would the code be common to a wider group of people? This then results in two following questions---
1. What would the wider group have been? A religious group? A secred society group? A geographic group? Or some other category of group?
2. If only the Peralta family, then the map maker would need to give this unique code to each of them---and if that is the case, then why not just tell that small group of people where it is, rather than codifying it on stone maps and going to all that fuss and bother?
Obviously, somebody besides the maker would have known exactly what all the symbols meant, otherwise the maps would have no real use.
Who could possibly have known exactly what all of the symbols meant?
The more people who would have known the code, the more likely that someone outside the group would have found it out, and possibly made it public. (Also, the larger the group who could de-code the stone maps, the more likely that the knowledge would be successfully passed on, and that they would have already recovered whatever the maps lead to.)
How large of a group were the maps likely to have been directed to?