Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’ve always bought into the massacre stories, to a certain degree, in that I do believe it happened. Different versions and I haven’t gone real deep into it.So…if we choose to reject the idea that the 1847 represents a date, then we also must suspend all of the conclusions based upon that, which leaves us with the idea that the stone tablets could have been made at anytime, and may be authentic.
I must've missed the part about the H/P stone being granite? Where was this info from?Horse/priest stone = granite
Two map stones = sandstone
Heart stone = basalt
Latin heart = slate
There is no definitive way to date petroglyphs, so I seriously question the FBI ability to date carved sandstone
Two cents here, two cents there, keeps the song going. We know the FBI tends to make mistakes now and then. I would say they just assumed the 1847 was a date, and gave their two cents worth.
I must've missed the part about the H/P stone being granite? Where was this info from?
The only thing I've seen on it was the DAI geologist who said:
View attachment 2103901
I've heard the tape from Jim Hatt, where Doyle Harnish describes the Latin Heart as black slate. It also sounds like the heart stone was red quartzite, but can't really make it out.
EDIT: I'm not sure what she means by Coconino sandstone, but I'm assuming she thinks it originates from a geologic formation i.e. the Coconino Plateau.
PS - My wife has been a geologist for over 30 years and says there's no way to precisely date rocks. If they're in place where they formed one can make assumptions about age in terms of geologic strata/epochs and any associated weathering that correlates with assumptions about ancient weather patterns. This is very basic, such as associating fossilized ferns etc. in strata with such plants needing a temperate/rainy environment. Or obvious signs of wet vs. dry weathering.
If they're not "in situ", some assumptions might be made about signs of weathering on stones, or lichen formation, but it's a WAG and there's not much certainty that would be provable using established scientific method.
My take-away is that accurately dating stones to within a hundred years is pretty much a guess, and probably based on weathering.
There are newer technologies being used today but they weren't available in the 1960's or 70's.
an interesting speculation; It seems to me that glueing the broken heart stone together would be as much work and less reliable than simply making a new one.
cyanoacrylate glue (super glue) was patented in 1947
Polyvinyl acetate glue was discovered in 1912
the break pattern is also interesting, two crack line forming a cross.
I can visualize one crack line occurring due to a miss-hap, and even two, but not forming a cross pattern.
obviously, the crystal structure of the stone is cubic, but still, an interesting detail