Im going to build an LRL (seriously)

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

Then why do you tell people to practice dowsing, in order to be able to work an LRL?
And why is it you say that if a person isn't feeling up to par, it won't work?
Why is it that LRLs can't be operated under pressure, like in a test?
You are being self contradictory in saying that LRL use isn't dowsing.
Illogical.

Th

en why do you tell people to practice dowsing, in order to be able to work an LRL?

Most newbie’s buy devices that require the use of rods..96% of the people can use rods..If you can not use rods they will not work…Using a set of rods is not Dowsing.

And why is it you say that if a person isn't feeling up to par, it won't work?

You claim that..I do not

Why is it that LRLs can't be operated under pressure, like in a test?

Just maybe a old skeptics tale

You are being self contradictory in saying that LRL use isn't dowsing.

If you say so..Art

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A Handbook of Civil War Bullets and Cartridges - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

~SWR~

Your "help" appears to confirm that MFD, calculators and other units are simply dowsing, and the piggyback electronics is useless

Yes.,.It appears and confirms that you have no idea of what we are talking about

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

~LT~

Let me help with this. If you use a device that swings, you have to me able to tell the difference of wind, stepping wrong, shifting your weight, a twitch of the hand, from a real reaction. If it lights up or beeps no need to learn anything about dowsing.

You can go out and work the water pipes or electric lines, it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you get the hang of telling false movements from real ones.

May I add dodging rocks, trees and the occasional Rattle Snake..Art

 

[EE THr]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

~SWR~

Your "help" appears to confirm that MFD, calculators and other units are simply dowsing, and the piggyback electronics is useless

Yes.,.It appears and confirms that you have no idea of what we are talking about

The guy with the Martians in his back yard says he has no idea what they are talking about either.

Until they start speaking English. Maybe you LRLrs should try that, too!

 

[fenixdigger]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

Easy to tell who has been out there. Sorry I get short sometimes, but when we try to explain something you have no field experience of even trying simple things, and can't grasp the actual meaning, whether it works or not.

Imagine trying to explain Fermat's last problem to a 5th grader. Same thing.

And of course Goober gets proved inept to even ask questions almost every time he jumps in, making the "critic view" look like a bunch of clowns doesn't help either. But I'm sure there's a good reason he never says he was wrong. (according to Freud)

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

~SWR~

Alternatively....when "we" try to explain how your gimmick will not produce any type of usable signal/frequency....it is easy to see who is out on the fringe. Most adults/grown-ups with any comprehension ability should comprehend - - - box empty, not send magic treasure-finding-beam
Then again...well, we'll just leave it at that and wave to ole fenix out there on the fringe

Alternatively....when "you" try to explain how these gimmick will not produce any type of usable signal/frequency we know that it is always going to be false information. We have witnessed these lines make their appearance..We have followed these man made signal line to the objects and recovered them…First hand information and not information from a skeptic web site..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

And that statement proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, you still don't have a clue. Guess what? I'm not going to say why or tell you where you are wrong. But you can count on this. Any good LRL user will fall out when they read that.

Bless your little heart, you do have some kind of comprehension problem to go with the others.

 

[fenixdigger]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

That's x-actly what I'm saying. You finally caught on.

 

[fenixdigger]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

Sorry, trying to catch a level you were comfortable in. Big boy talk seems to be WAY over your head. Do you concur

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

hio - as I have monotonously posted, the human interface is the key, as it is in most machines. It tells the machine, or whatever, what to look for, and it certainly isn't the gold ring or watch that may be worn. Is this soo dfficult to visualize and understand my sceptic friends?

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

fenix---

It would really help if you would indicate who your posts are addressed to.

Also, since there are a few different people using that account, it would help to state if you are fenix#1, fenix#2, or fenix#3, and so forth. It's no fun explaining the same things to "fenix" three or four different times. And also, it's confusing when they offer conflicting opinions, in different posts. I would like to know who I'm talking to, huh?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

Also, since there are a few different people using that account, it would help to state if you are fenix#1, fenix#2, or fenix#3, and so forth. It's no fun explaining the same things to "fenix" three or four different times. And also, it's confusing when they offer conflicting opinions, in different posts. I would like to know who I'm talking to, huh?

Other Skeptics

 

[fenixdigger]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

I already said, I'm not going to let them on. They can register next time.

EE, you make a lot of sense on most of your questions unlike many of the others. The only thing you lack is a little field time to see for yourself. Whether it works or not if you understand what's happening in the field, you will get a clearer idea of what we are talking about.

Poor SWR has made God knows how many posts on forums and still does not have a clue about this. From what I have seen he does not want to really know and this has turned into something other than a learning quest. I'll leave it at that.

You are too smart to come here and have people not nearly as educated as you think, 'What a dumb a$$" simply by not spending a little time checking it out. I don't want to convince you that LRLs work, only that there is some sort of natural phenomenon that humans can perceive. Why would you pass up a chance to see it?

You saw the pictures, I'll put my cheap, home made things up against those $10,000 units and out perform them. ( already have)
So I am not promoting any of them. I do have bought units, and some of the crew likes to use them.

 

[EE THr]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

fenix---

I know what you said about your account, but since you have posted statements which conflicted with each other, and when I questioned that, you gave no reply, I assumed that different people were using your account. That's why I asked you about it before today. The fact that I guessed what was going on, tends to validate my theory about it. It will take awhile for me to be convinced of what you are now stating about it.

Contrary to what you assume, I fully understand what you are saying about experiencing LRLs in the field. If you read my position on the difference between dowsing and LRLs, I would think that you should understand that I totally get what you are saying. I would also think that you should understand that field experience is irrelevant to my position. (And that's another reason I suspect that more than one person is posting under your username---because it seems like they don't all read all of the posts, and that's why they ask questions which have already been answered, and make statements which have already been hashed out.)

If you are finding what you are looking for, that's great! But when anyone infers that LRLs can be used by anybody and everybody, it can cause hardships for others, and that's just wrong.

As for experiencing it myself, that is irrelevant to my position, because (let me make this perfectly clear) whether or not some people find stuff with LRLs, is not my issue at all. So please pass that around your shop, so the others there won't keep bring that up. Thank you.





P.S. The only reason that I may, sometimes, contest LRL finds, is to point out that merely saying something is not formal proof.

The abundance of so-called "proof by statements of finds," is far outweighed by the refusal to take the test. And the lack of reasons (or circular logic involved in the so-called "reasons") for taking the test, is in direct contradiction to some of the more profound statements being made on this forum, which infer that LRLs will always work, and for anyone.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

As for experiencing it myself, that is irrelevant to my position, because (let me make this perfectly clear) whether or not some people find stuff with LRLs, is not my issue at all. So please pass that around your shop, so the others there won't keep bring that up. Thank you.

No—thank You

 

[EE THr]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

As for experiencing it myself, that is irrelevant to my position, because (let me make this perfectly clear) whether or not some people find stuff with LRLs, is not my issue at all. So please pass that around your shop, so the others there won't keep bring that up. Thank you.

No—thank You

Well, that indicates to me that you are insincere, are here only to make false claims and cause confusion about the issue.




ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

Well, that indicates to me that you are insincere, are here only to make false claims and cause confusion about the issue.

No we do not cause confusion..that is the job of the skeptics

 

[EE THr]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

Well, that indicates to me that you are insincere, are here only to make false claims and cause confusion about the issue.

No we do not cause confusion..that is the job of the skeptics

No data, only double-talk.





That's a #17, by the way. And remember, "predictability is proof."

ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

Hola EE: You posted --> That's a #17, by the way. And remember, "predictability is proof."
************
Unfortunately, repeat performance or predictability in many cases is an impossibility, many are of a one time occurrence, but not necessarily terminal performances. I have mentioned several.

Regarding predictability, I remember reading somewhere that if you take a certain shaped gourd, cut by a virgin of 16 years under a full moon, fill it with certain herbs, cane juice, well sprinkled with the virgin's saliva from chewing more sugar cane and spitting into the gourd, then placing it in a certain type of tree on a special bend of the river that after a certain period it will cure many diseases and infections.

Of course today we use a sterile lab to manufacture the same Penicillin.

Regardless, both methods did, and do work, but through vastly different theories and techniques. Thus it is with LrL"s / dowsing and conventional field / electronic theories.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[GuyinWH]

Re: I'm going to build an LRL (seriously)

Well, that indicates to me that you are insincere, are here only to make false claims and cause confusion about the issue.

No we do not cause confusion..that is the job of the skeptics

Sure keep babbling all you want.
The truth is easily discernible from all your drivel.

Just look above my post for more of you LRL kooks antics... If you are all trying to clear up the confusion then why does REAL not clear up your baloney posts? Because you have more BS posts on this forum than there are treasurenet members.

Want to see confusion, you can look at your previous posts; Real on the other hand is so confused he doesn't know what hes posting about from the looks of it. Why? Because you're STILL backing LRLs. That my friends is delusion.