markmar
Silver Member
- Oct 17, 2012
- 4,177
- 6,355
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
If the tower in the mission picture is not a bell tower , could be a lookout tower or both .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NP - thanks for your answer. Not to sound like a smart-butt, however there were WAYYYYYY many more people in that area than just Jim Bark. The whole Barkley family and all the folks who worked for him. All the men who worked for Bark during that time. All the folks involved in the search for Adolph Ruth, and the list goes on and on and on.
How do you explain the fact that not a single other reference than Bob Ward's book and your photo has come to light yet identifying a "mission" or even a structure like that in that specific area?
It will be interesting to talk to Clay Worst about it since he was all over the Superstitions and between he and Tom Kollenborn would have either known about, seen or heard about a mission in that area.
I know you think everyone is against you and conspiring to hide the information for some unknown reason, but I've seen no evidence of that myself - all I hear are a bunch of people using logic to try to understand how a structure like that can go virtually completely unnoticed (especially if it WAS a mission), in an area where there were many many people.
Paul,
I sent NP's picture to Tom, when he first posted it, along with the story. I just went back and reread his reply. This is what he wrote:
"I have heard stories about this so-called Jesuit mission for years supposedly located along the banks of Queen Creek. Oh yes, one of the church's bells was found in Queen Creek. The gold from this mission was removed by Robert L. Garman so claimed Bob Ward. Joe, it is all BS starting with the Ward cabin story."
That's good enough for me.
Take care,
Joe
I guess tom forgot were he is at,since the mission is not located on queen creek,I would say tom is seriously loosing his memory,I guess that's a good way to say woops,how did I miss this part of history,I guess soon every one will know the truth, and something else he has wrong,as long as ive ever heard about the mission,not bob or any one else ever said it was a Jesuit mission,np ps,why don't you send him the real information next time, not what you made up
pippinwhitepaws, I just posted all that back to cactusjumper on his post, thank you very much,np
Markmar - what you consider to be a "tower" in the image is not a part of the building structure, but rather an extension of the mountain range in the background.If the tower in the mission picture is not a bell tower , could be a lookout tower or both .
Markmar - what you consider to be a "tower" in the image is not a part of the building structure, but rather an extension of the mountain range in the background.
Looks like this post was just a "drive by."
You used the word house. Was that intentional? Will you share its location? If not, can you explain why? Perhaps it will help a few thinkers here on the TN. I cant get past the number of window openings on this structure. Seems excessive or perhaps it had a wealthy benefactor. Also, no structural wood to be seen... (excluding the windows)? How do roofing timbers decay without damaging the adobe structure? Thanks! Here is the image enlarged. Click to see full size. No question about the medium. It is a photo. <img src="http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=870663"/> and for comparison, an 85 year old color photograph. <img src="http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=870665"/>
Yes, it's a house. It's as real as can be. It has historical significance only because people are becoming more aware of their local history. If it wasn't for that, nobody would give a damn about it. I first visited the house about 10 years ago. I plan to go there again soon and will take new pics and/or video.