Why skeptics doesnt show proof?

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

fenix---

Someone dug a hole 2 feet deep. Then they pushed the necklace into the side of the hole, at the bottom. Just the bare necklace, no container to protect it. And left the hole open, that is, they didn't fill it in.

Then you came along and "located" a target, in the undisturbed soil right beside the hole. You dug a new hole, which adjoined the original hole, and made it one big hole.

And lo and behold, there was the necklace!

Right.








Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud
 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!
Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

fenixdigger said:
...the last thing on my mind was to document proof to furnish to you.
Click to expand...


Then why is it always on your mind to promote LRLs here on the forum? You seem to be preoccupied with continuously blathering about LRLs. While other people post their finds, instead of promoting their equipment.

It seems that if you were constantly thinking about convincing people about LRLs, you would also be thinking enough to bring a video camera along, as that would be the very best way to promote them.

I'm sorry, but your anti-logic just isn't cutting it. Like I've said before, con-artists always want someone to just "believe" them, and detest the suggestion that they actually prove what they claim.

Your attitude turns out to have all the attributes of a snake oil salesman.

Like "Smokey the Psychiatrist" says, "Only You Can Prevent Mistrust."

Change your attitude, change your behavior, and your life on forums will go much smoother. Everybody else seems to get along just fine. Why can't you? Start acting like an adult, and people won't need to question all of your claims.

Either lessen your unsubstantiated claims, or start doing the few simple things necessary to prove them.

It's so s-i-m-p-l-e ! I know you can do it if you want to. :dontknow:








Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Mr. Judy---

I realize that you suffer financially, from having to buy twice as many razor blades as everyone else, but that's really no reason to be hateful towards others.

The gibberish which you are so gleefully spewing, is merely the intentionally profound sounding opinion of either some long dead person who couldn't actually work for a living, so had to con people into thinking that he knew more than they did, so they would buy his book; or that of someone who is merely hopeful that others will be convinced that he, to, can sound like he has some kind of great Worldly knowledge, just like the deceased deadbeat whose book he memorized.

There is no workable knowledge whatsoever in formal psychology, and that is proven by the stark lack of actual cures for mental health, even to this day. That would be exactly zero ability for them to cure any mental illness, including their own. No cures have ever been recorded or reported.

If that is where you place your hopes for outsmarting people, you'll not have good results. However, you are doing a great job of emulating them, as all you seem to ever do is attempt to invalidate people on a personal level, and then act silly when you are not able to.

Remember, you shouldn't get your panties in a hitch, especially when they're not built to hold the equipment which you have.

It's not nice to fool mother nature....






Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Mr. Judy---

P.S. Would you please post a link to at least one time where you gave some kind of real input which was actually about the topic of treasure hunting?

(I'm getting a blip on my troll-dar screen, and I think it's you.)





Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=trolldar
trolldar
buy trolldar mugs, tshirts and magnets
The "sixth-sense" that allows one to know when he is being trolled.
Random Guy 1: "So this guy posted that he had killed the president, and this guy thought he was serious!"
Random Guy 2: "He needs to learn to trolldar
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Some one is getting used to it. "And they blissfully skipped into the night holding hands, secure in the knowledge, they had saved humanity, while not realizing the next rain would remove all signs of their delusional rantings" ( author unknown)

Sad seeing this develop, but that's how it spreads. That condition is like jock-itch. The more you scratch it , the worse it gets, and when you have somebody else help you scratch it,,,,,,, well you know.

And for those of you that saw my post before it was yanked, #3, #3A, #3B, #4, & #1
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Judas---

Actually, I looked it up after I saw SWR's post about your cut-and-pasting. It took about 30 seconds. Learn to use a search engine.

As a wannabe shrink, you should know that when you attack the messenger, rather than rebut the message, it means that you have no data to support your claims. It's know as an ad hominem attack. It's what they call in poker, a "tell." I guess it's obvious to everyone but you. Well, now you know.

Incidentally, why do you dislike people who help others? That's actually called being civilized. You should try it sometime.

Maybe you're just in a bad mood because you cut your chin again while shaving? Hint: Never use the same razor for both your legs and your beard. And while I'm helping you out, I might as well add that, if you are trying to fool people, don't use your man-cave furniture in your avatar next time!

And it might help to ditch that cigar, too.






Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

I think the question was clearly answered by SWR
"Folks just do not understand that something has be be proven to work...first...before you can prove that it doesn't"
~SWR
Click to expand...
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

artie---

aarthrj3811 said:
I think the question was clearly answered by SWR
"Folks just do not understand that something has be be proven to work...first...before you can prove that it doesn't"
~SWR
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


Your post says that either you are un-bright enough to engage in an ad hominem attack, or you finally agree with us!




So which is it?






Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Does anyone know who Judy is affiliated with in terms of LRL interests? Is it Winders?

I noticed he was one of the two members of her "Big Organization" prior to making it private and posting some scanned pictures, presumably of her, that based on the hair style, black lacquer chair and the fact that they were pre-digital, were clearly taken circa 1980's.

If those are recent pictures, though, I'm perfectly willing to forgo all science and fully believe in LRL if you're willing to let me take you out for a couple Martinis :wink:
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Mr. Judy---

Well, we should call you Mr. cut-and-paste. This page is all over the Web, I didn't go past the first search results page, but it was full.

Your problem is that you try to take any rebuttal, and apply it to not-very-similar conditions.

The whole point of that article is whether the person attacking is doing so as a diversion away from the topic.

I was very specific in exposing that you were attacking me personally, because you don't have any real data to rebut my list of reasons for LRL fraud, so you needed to divert away from the topic, by making it seem that I, myself, were the topic.

Now, if you want to claim that your insults had nothing to do with any forum topic, then you should turn yourself in for violating forum rules. It's got to be either one way or the other. It's as simple as that.

So which is it?





Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

~LSMorgan~
This is completely absurd... Metal Detectors do not require 'human interface' to accomplish the functions they're designed to do.
They will detect metal whether a human is handling them or not.
Click to expand...

My instruction manual tells me how to set my detector up. My instruction manual tells me how I should swing the metal detector. My manual tells me how to search the area..Is this not how Metal detectors work with the human interface ?
You seem to think it is some kind of proof that a metal detector will beep when on a bench. Again this test can not be preformed unless a person has programmed it and then waves a object in front of it. Again the human interface is required.
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

aarthrj3811 said:
~LSMorgan~
This is completely absurd... Metal Detectors do not require 'human interface' to accomplish the functions they're designed to do.
They will detect metal whether a human is handling them or not.
Click to expand...

My instruction manual tells me how to set my detector up. My instruction manual tells me how I should swing the metal detector. My manual tells me how to search the area..Is this not how Metal detectors work with the human interface ?
You seem to think it is some kind of proof that a metal detector will beep when on a bench. Again this test can not be preformed unless a person has programmed it and then waves a object in front of it. Again the human interface is required.
Click to expand...

Sucks they didn't put "This device is a fraud" in the manual for those LRL devices.
But that wouldn't matter because the LRL crowd on here would back it 100% regardless.

Anyways heres some more proof I'm sure I posted at some point in the past.


100% relevant from a reputable source. Don't give me the BS about it being a "bomb detector" watch the video.
Its been the exact same case with every device of this kind that I have taken apart from H3s to Rangertells to mom and pop POS.
FRAUDULENT devices meant to separate you from your money by lieing cheating and stealing CON ARTISTs.
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Let me see if I have this right.

You have 74 posts under this name. Yet you have taken apart all kinds of LRLs, indicating a LONG time fooling with this.

You are whining to treasure hunters about things that crooks are doing that NO ONE has control over.

You have NO posts saying you have spent intense effort trying to "learn" how to use any of these, or visited anyone to get help.

Is this correct???
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

fenixdigger said:
Let me see if I have this right.

You have 74 posts under this name. Yet you have taken apart all kinds of LRLs, indicating a LONG time fooling with this.

You are whining to treasure hunters about things that crooks are doing that NO ONE has control over.

You have NO posts saying you have spent intense effort trying to "learn" how to use any of these, or visited anyone to get help.

Is this correct???
Click to expand...

What's there to learn? It's usually all about ideo-motor response anyways. Besides, I wouldn't need help with anything, in regards to geotechnical/geophysical aspects I'd ask my wife.
But thats all irrelevant as per the video anyways.. Add to that I'm not necessarily whining to LRL crooks; I'm trying to avert someone who doesn't know about these frauds to realize these are a waste of time (and alot of money).
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

aarthrj3811 said:
100% relevant from a reputable source.
Click to expand...

And news reporters are just a little above Lawyers on the trustworthy list…art
Click to expand...

Sidestepping the information in the video, how typical.

And news reporters would still be well above you judging from the fact it doesn't seem like you have a formal education.
Add to that the cognitive specialist that got questioned about it in the video...


EDIT:
Oh wait !!!!! THERES MORE!!

So basically, you admit you won't listen because its a reporter?
Would you listen to a scientist on TV? A specialist in the field?
Not an LRL vendor but SPECIALISTS...


No you wouldn't, and you have without a doubt demonstrated that repeatedly on here because you are in on the whole scam thats why.
Why else would someone completely be in for this, such as yourself, unless they were in some cult ??
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Mr. Judy---

JudyH said:
In your haste to attack me, perhaps you overlooked the link I posted at the bottom..... :dontknow:
Click to expand...


You're right. I goofed.

But it was in my haste to "set you straight." Since you have never posted anything informative about treasure hunting of any kind, but only attack those you have labeled "skeptics," it would be impossible for me to "attack" you.

I have fended you off a few times, though.



P.S. Why did you remove Eddie's picture from your Facebook page?




Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Is Earth NMR and dowsing related?

⬅️ Previous Thread

Securities & Exchange Comission employs "fake locators" to teach lesson

Next Thread ➡️

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
High Plains Prospectors

Latest Discussions

Back
Top