Video 4 - The Peralta Stone Maps with Frank Augustine

People who claim to have answers should understand until they prove that they do in fact have answers, people will rightfully be skeptical. I can claim all kinds of things, and make arguments that sound good to willing and gullible ears. But until I prove my case with verifiable evidence, people shouldn't believe a word of my claims. Plain and simple.
 

Trust me we have many amazing sites in AZ which includes Coronado's summer home, Egyptian tombs and Kuskurza.
 

I trust no one who makes claims without providing evidence. Period. Especially when they start talking about an Egyptian presence in the US.
 

People who claim to have answers should understand until they prove that they do in fact have answers, people will rightfully be skeptical. I can claim all kinds of things, and make arguments that sound good to willing and gullible ears. But until I prove my case with verifiable evidence, people shouldn't believe a word of my claims. Plain and simple.

Totally understandable...the thing is, our evidence is online if one chooses to find it. People demand data and evidence without doing the research on us. Peace and Love baby!
 

I've been around T-net for many years now and there are always people who want to talk about Atlantis, Phoenicians, Egyptians, and many other such topics. Yet when pressed for evidence they never have any verifiable evidence that can pass muster.
 

Totally understandable...the thing is, our evidence is online if one chooses to find it. People demand data and evidence without doing the research on us. Peace and Love baby!
its been my experience that when someone has a treasure located they keep quiet..especially when investors are involved...if the investors find out someone has been blabbing on an open forum about the find...the investors usually pull out and divorce theirselves from that person fast...
 

I've had people post maps with specific locations they claim things exist here in NM, yet when I went to those locations, there was nothing at all to be found. Because people believe something to be true in no way means it is true, and they assure you all along they are right. Even when you send them photos proving nothing is there as they claimed, they continue on believing whatever they want.
 

Kinkaid's claims?
soup-line.jpg
 

Totally understandable...the thing is, our evidence is online if one chooses to find it. People demand data and evidence without doing the research on us. Peace and Love baby!

How did your Bigfoot hunt go? Did ya'll ever catch 'em?
 

true matt...i've had people take me to sites they swear is a treasure site....nothing has ever been unearthed from any of them
 

The best strategy is to always let the evidence lead your conclusions, and not the other way around.
 

I can assure you these locations have been located. The things I've seen in the last 5yrs flip science, history and all Academia upside down. The release of this information has to be done properly to ensure complete transparency. Otherwise nobody will get the whole story.

KX,

Within any subject worth discussing and proving ones side is a good debate. Substance that can be proven, and substantiated with facts. Each person that is firmly stood upon a belief is in essence trying to "Genuinely" turn the opposing side to believe in what they are saying. So let's just begin by saying, within this forum is a discussion of the Stones, what they say and where they may lead. Your stance is that they have been viewed and followed in that a discovery has been made by means other than you personally putting boots on the ground to make the discovery.
The opposing side is discussing the all mighty W's, (who, what, where, why and when) and have numerous facts including artist scribed marks, physical inspection, historical documentation as well as artist renditions. The discussion of these facts is a "Discussion" in the essence of this forum, and with the process being thought out, and bounced from one mind to another, their paths, thoughts, along with discoveries have been shared making the side of their theory have substance to be compelling and thought provoking.
On your side of the debate you have offered no substance, no fact, no history, no video, no manuscript, nothing. In fact, all you have to offer is "you will see when the time is right" which has not an ounce of anything compelling other than an individual that needs feedback to substantiate your presence in the forum. And, when pressed you divert to Egyptians, Pyramids and who knows what next. I understand that you have your beliefs and you believe them, but to turn people's opinions and beliefs you need to be more compelling with your arguments and offer something substantial, including your experience and WHY you believe what you believe (omit the pyramid and Egyptian part). For me, it is an education about a Legend that is being worked by individuals that have the passion, persistence and patience and bring to the table the dedication and information that compels them to discover additional information on their next journey. And with that said, please take the pyramids along with the Egyptians to the relevant forum, as this forum is not about Egyptian discoveries or pyramids or Tutankhamun, it's about the Superstition Mountains and the stone maps involving the Peraltas, Jacob Waltz and the Petrash's.

Tina
 

Folks - I apologize - I'm not going to have the video done tonight either. I am putting a lot of time and effort into this and want it to be perfect.

I realize this is the 2nd delay - but once it's done and see all the effort frank and I have put into it - you'll understand why.

Edit - I have attached these 2 slides from the video - to give you an idea of what I am working on =)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-06-14 at 6.49.35 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-06-14 at 6.49.35 PM.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 147
  • Screen Shot 2015-06-14 at 7.03.06 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-06-14 at 7.03.06 PM.png
    519 KB · Views: 200
Last edited:
KX,

Within any subject worth discussing and proving ones side is a good debate. Substance that can be proven, and substantiated with facts. Each person that is firmly stood upon a belief is in essence trying to "Genuinely" turn the opposing side to believe in what they are saying. So let's just begin by saying, within this forum is a discussion of the Stones, what they say and where they may lead. Your stance is that they have been viewed and followed in that a discovery has been made by means other than you personally putting boots on the ground to make the discovery.
The opposing side is discussing the all mighty W's, (who, what, where, why and when) and have numerous facts including artist scribed marks, physical inspection, historical documentation as well as artist renditions. The discussion of these facts is a "Discussion" in the essence of this forum, and with the process being thought out, and bounced from one mind to another, their paths, thoughts, along with discoveries have been shared making the side of their theory have substance to be compelling and thought provoking.
On your side of the debate you have offered no substance, no fact, no history, no video, no manuscript, nothing. In fact, all you have to offer is "you will see when the time is right" which has not an ounce of anything compelling other than an individual that needs feedback to substantiate your presence in the forum. And, when pressed you divert to Egyptians, Pyramids and who knows what next. I understand that you have your beliefs and you believe them, but to turn people's opinions and beliefs you need to be more compelling with your arguments and offer something substantial, including your experience and WHY you believe what you believe (omit the pyramid and Egyptian part). For me, it is an education about a Legend that is being worked by individuals that have the passion, persistence and patience and bring to the table the dedication and information that compels them to discover additional information on their next journey. And with that said, please take the pyramids along with the Egyptians to the relevant forum, as this forum is not about Egyptian discoveries or pyramids or Tutankhamun, it's about the Superstition Mountains and the stone maps involving the Peraltas, Jacob Waltz and the Petrash's.

Tina

they show up here about every 3 months claiming to have located everything from the ldm to the 7 cities of cibola..always the same story..just wait and see
 

I wonder if you include me as one of the "they" az???

Like I have stated for many many years...The proof is in the pudding and ya'll can call me "Bill Cosby"... lol And I am not in any rush to prove myself to anyone...I have already done that...One thing is certain...You won't see me taking a phone or any device which would reveal said locations...Hell...I won't even take any pictures...hahaha

Pudding anyone???hehehe

Ed T :)

ed..i'm not sure..i havent read any of your posts where you claim to have hit the bonanza
 

Folks - I apologize - I'm not going to have the video done tonight either. I am putting a lot of time and effort into this and want it to be perfect.

I realize this is the 2nd delay - but once it's done and see all the effort frank and I have put into it - you'll understand why.

Edit - I have attached these 2 slides from the video - to give you an idea of what I am working on =)


I'm sure it'll be well worth the wait, so take your time.

Every one of your videos has generated very interesting and serious discussions, the likes of which I have not seen in a long time.

Looking forward to the new thread.
 

I don't underestimate the ancients, I just haven't seen any conclusive evidence they were ever in the US.
 

I wonder if you include me as one of the "they" az???

Like I have stated for many many years...The proof is in the pudding and ya'll can call me "Bill Cosby"... lol And I am not in any rush to prove myself to anyone...I have already done that...One thing is certain...You won't see me taking a phone or any device which would reveal said locations...Hell...I won't even take any pictures...hahaha

Pudding anyone???hehehe

Ed T :)

Calling you "Bill Cosby" with today's information isn't really a good comparison, or is it????
Moving back to the topic....
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top