Video 4 - The Peralta Stone Maps with Frank Augustine

Ryan

About your debate with Homar . Why should need someone an investor just to check out if his theory is right or wrong ?

And now about your photographic memory and the ability to see things that no match ( with the clues or maps ) . What if the stone trail has only 1847 paces length and starts somewhere 850 feet over the canyon floor ?
Could you recognize this trail in the mountains ? I don't think so but I could be wrong .

So , don't reject anyone's theory until you check it out .
 

Ryan

About your debate with Homar . Why should need someone an investor just to check out if his theory is right or wrong ?

And now about your photographic memory and the ability to see things that no match ( with the clues or maps ) . What if the stone trail has only 1847 paces length and starts somewhere 850 feet over the canyon floor ?
Could you recognize this trail in the mountains ? I don't think so but I could be wrong .

So , don't reject anyone's theory until you check it out .

i think what ryan is trying to tell you is that the theories of people that have never set foot in the supes are a little difficult for us (the people that have been in the supes) to grasp and if you would come to arizona and spend time searching the mountains then we might put some stock in what you say
 

When is due time? Riveted

Books are being written/published, radio shows being scheduled, documentary and show being filmed. This summer is getting busier by the day. Hundreds of sites to show as proof of template math. They've all been done the same way. Now that the Supes show contract has ended all projects are finally able to continue. Contracts won't allow any release at present moment.
 

i think what ryan is trying to tell you is that the theories of people that have never set foot in the supes are a little difficult for us (the people that have been in the supes) to grasp and if you would come to arizona and spend time searching the mountains then we might put some stock in what you say

AzDave

I put more faith in a theory based in clues , maps and a detailed explanation about the factors which led the person to developing his/her theory , instead of a theory from a person who never knew to read/recognize a map and with lack of knowledge about treasure signs/marks just because he hiked in these mountains .
 

AzDave

I put more faith in a theory based in clues , maps and a detailed explanation about the factors which led the person to developing his/her theory , instead of a theory from a person who never knew to read/recognize a map and with lack of knowledge about treasure signs/marks just because he hiked in these mountains .

marius..if you dont mind me asking..where are you located?
 

i think what ryan is trying to tell you is that the theories of people that have never set foot in the supes are a little difficult for us (the people that have been in the supes) to grasp and if you would come to arizona and spend time searching the mountains then we might put some stock in what you say

All you have ever gone by, including theory, in the desert, is your own findings while there?
That dismisses someone else's interpretation when creating the stone maps theorizing they are usable ,or should by your standard of nothing but feet on ground can comprehend relative theories. Yet have you tried to interpret the stone maps of some one else, or not? Was the original stones carver(s) in the mountains when the stones were carved? Someone understood the maps as they are not caused by natures hand so why not reach and say anyone not having been in the supes has no insight, is as accurate as saying any who have been in the supes and have not found the maps ends are a little more difficult to believe as they were there so what of the searching the mountains theory then? Too big, too tough or how many other ways to justify being empty handed? Or is it a problem of interpreting a map before wearing out boot leather?
 

All you have ever gone by, including theory, in the desert, is your own findings while there?
That dismisses someone else's interpretation when creating the stone maps theorizing they are usable ,or should by your standard of nothing but feet on ground can comprehend relative theories. Yet have you tried to interpret the stone maps of some one else, or not? Was the original stones carver(s) in the mountains when the stones were carved? Someone understood the maps as they are not caused by natures hand so why not reach and say anyone not having been in the supes has no insight, is as accurate as saying any who have been in the supes and have not found the maps ends are a little more difficult to believe as they were there so what of the searching the mountains theory then? Too big, too tough or how many other ways to justify being empty handed? Or is it a problem of interpreting a map before wearing out boot leather?
i've never wasted a minute of my time trying to figure out those or any other stone maps...the maps in question were created in someones back yard about 60 years ago...lol...
 

Give you all the answers...do your homework for you. The truth is out there so go uncover it.
 

Give you all the answers...do your homework for you. The truth is out there so go uncover it.

lol..if you dont want us to find it..then why are you on here telling us about it....believe me..i dont have any interest in what you are digging in new mexico...i stick close to home
 

I can assure you these locations have been located. The things I've seen in the last 5yrs flip science, history and all Academia upside down. The release of this information has to be done properly to ensure complete transparency. Otherwise nobody will get the whole story.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 91

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top