Infosponge said:
Good morning,
I believe in order for us to go forward a misnomer, or a misconception as to use of the word “mission” should be clarified. When referring to the "Jesuit mission," be it at Guevavi or else where, it is not specific to a "church," rather it is all encompassing to the entire effort. Such as the following: It was part of their mission at each mission site to teach Catechism to the Indians, it was part of their mission to setup a ranch and raise livestock, it was part of their mission to plant and harvest crops, and it was part of their mission to build a church at the chosen site for their mission. Therefore, it could be a misconception when one refers to something like "the Jesuits lost mission of Santa Isabel," which is claimed to be located in Baja, California. Most people automatically assume there is a church or a mission complex involved, which historian's such as Charles W. Polzer, S.J. claim no such mission ever existed. If the lost Jesuit mission of Santa Isabel does exist, then maybe it is nothing more than a site which was chosen and named Santa Isabel, and it was the Jesuits mission to hide their most valuable church treasures there in order to keep them out of the hands of the King of Spain. Or maybe its just another mission impossible!
Sincerely,
Infosponge
TS. Here : First I would like to thank everyone here on this forum who posted so many articles,maps, questions, possible answers. it has been very rewarding
As I have found out that alot of questions and answers lead to even more questions. speculations and answers. How inquisitive!.
First I would like to say I Have to agree with previous post from members on here.
1. The Molina Document is not an origional, but perhaps an account of a document read earlier by its author, and then re-wriiten , perhaps several times over by several people handed down through the generations.
2. A origional site was not a mission untill later, first it was an old adobe building with a dirt floor managed by someone other then the Franciscan monk or Jesuit Priest, because he was away teaching.However visited from time to time by other men of the cloth.
3. Although there has been controversey on here weather the Jesuits were involved in mining or not. Only raises the question where did they get the large amounts of cash needed to purchase things between the times they ran out of the money that the church provided them initially and the next stipened they would recieve from the church.
Remember the old country was far away and it took alot of time to get to the new world. Also the indians they taught were poor. So they
had to finance themselves somehow. This is why I believe if they were not involved in mining , they sure must have obtained the Gold and silver through offerings or perhaps involved somehow. This is only my belief and all though there is no evidence of such involvement. I believe that they were involved. once again this is only my belief.
4. Someone had made a comment on an earlier post that digging and poking around a historical site is not a good thing and can ruin things. To this I agree mostly, However I would say digging and poking have led to the historical findings of such places. remember alot of places have been covered up completly by the sands of time, and if it were not for poking and digging we would not know of there existance.
As to all who have posted on here will tell you Remember your surroundings and proceed with caution.
Thanks for letting me post 10/26/2010 T.S.