the blindbowman
Bronze Member
- Nov 21, 2006
- 1,379
- 30
- Thread starter
- #241
lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cubfan64 said:the blindbowman said:Cubfan64 said:stay safe stay free
Yah, that's what I thought
have you ever found anyting?
Let me show you how easy this is - took me all of 5 minutes and I don't have photoshop on this computer...
The best documented and most searched-for Wisconsin outlaw cache is the suit- case containing $200,000 in currency that John Dillinger buried in the woods behind the Little Bohemia Lodge on Star Lake in 1934. When Federal agents learned that Dillinger and his gang had taken over the Little Bohemia, they mobilized a strike force which quickly closed off three sides of the Lodge. The lakeside, however, was left unguarded. Worse yet, the jumpy G-men mistook Eugene Boisoneau and John Hoffman, two workers from a nearby CCC camp, for members of the gang and opened fire on them as they left the Lodge. Boisoneau was killed, Hoffman was badly wounded, and the outlaws were alerted to the impending ambush.
Dillinger slipped out the back window and hid the suitcase in the woods. In the ensuing confusion the gang split up and escaped along the lake shore, killing a Federal agent in the process. Dillinger himself was gunned down in Chicago, taking the secret of the location of the suitcase full of swag to his grave.
I grew up in Wisconsin and spent much of my life around the Little Bohemia Lodge - I found a suitcase one day full of these...
What's the matter? Isn't this proof enough??
the blindbowman said:Cubfan64 said:stay safe stay free
Yah, that's what I thought
have you ever found anyting?
your picture is a little blury . ...LOL
i think its your camera ...
Cubfan64 said:your picture is a little blury . ...LOL
i think its your camera ...
*sigh* and you don't even get the humor in the blurry photo
To everyone else, sorry to have DIVERTED this thread from it's course. I look forward to continuing to read some of the excellent information presented by folks like Oro & RDT and just ignore the "chaff."
My apologies - I should have taken this to PM,s.
Hey Oro,
I found a hotel that charges between $37 and $46 dollars a day in the general area that I am playing with...And they are a 3 to 4 star hotel...I don't know if you and Mrs. Oro want to take a trip to Mexico this Dec. or not...I could tell you that the machaka will be very good if you take me up on the offer...Though I am not sure of exactly what mines I would take you to see...I could leave that up to you...In either case I don't think you would want to ride the mule...LOL If you were to go, would you and Mrs. Oro be taking a 4x4?
I will talk to my wife and see if it will be o.k. with her...
The only people who know what I've found are myself and my wife - Just because I'll be retiring at age 49 to a life of luxury when I've never made over $50K per year doesn't mean anything - or does
ORO here is a map of TAYOPA which has never seen much circulation. Notice the striking similarity betwen it and Dobie's map. including orientation. Conclusions?
Ok... sorry your rock is prettier Oro.
they have found a 'plate' of mica under the floors of many of the Temple's in Mexico. No one knows why, but isn't it interesting.
find things just by looking down, lol.
Where can I go look at the talk about Vikings?
thank you
Janiece
Out of curiosity, a general question: have any of you actually worked in an underground mine and seen ore from a sulfide deposit being mined? Not 'ore samples' from the dump, but vein material, the stuff that made the mine a mine.
Cubfan wrote:
Quote
The only people who know what I've found are myself and my wife - Just because I'll be retiring at age 49 to a life of luxury when I've never made over $50K per year doesn't mean anything - or does
Dang Cubfan, I had no idea! Gee you wouldn't be in a position to make a small loan to a fellow you've never met, would you? Roll Eyes Shocked Grin Cheesy tongue3 Just kidding amigo, I wouldn't lend me money either! Roll Eyes Cry
Judging by the photo and your description - WOW congrats on a great find! Have you tried cutting glass with it? Also, a relatively simple test is to drop it in a glass of water - if it seems to "vanish" (if memory serves) then it is likely diamond.Its at least 2 k
andwhile walking around the Beverly Hills Hotel
One time I was at Universal Studios and trying to not sit down but get it right
did it really matter what we talked about
There are some less reliable methods you can try but there are no guarantees with these:
1. The old “If it will scratch glass it has to be a diamond.” Well, it is true that diamonds do scratch glass but so do a lot of the other fakes on the market. To boot, it’s possible to injure your rock even if it’s real during your hardness test.
2. The transparency test. If you flip the diamond in question upside down and place it over some newsprint and can clearly read through the stone, it’s not a diamond. (The problem with this test is some diamonds are cut shallow and can be read through.)
3. The fog test. This test I like a lot. Put the rock in front of your mouth and fog it like you would try to fog a mirror. If it stays fogged for 2-4 seconds, it’s a fake. A real diamond disperses the heat instantaneously so by the time you look at it, it has already cleared up. (A down fall to this test is oil and dirt on the stone can effect its reliability and the test is not accurate at all on doublets where the top of the stone is diamond and the bottom is cubic zirconia epoxied together.)
4. The weight test. The most popular of diamond simulants (fake) is a cubic zirconia. C.Z.’s weigh approximately 55% more than diamonds for the same shape and dimension. So if you have a carat or gram scale at your disposal you can see if the imposter tips the scales too much.
5. The U.V. test. A high percentage of diamonds fluorescence blue when put under an ultra violet light (black light). Since 99% of all fakes don’t, a positive identification of medium to strong blue would indicate a diamond. The bad news is if this method proves you have a diamond, it also proves your diamond is worth less. Diamonds with blue fluorescence are as much as 20% less valuable. Remember, lack of blue fluorescence doesn’t mean it’s a fake; it could just be a better quality diamond.
6. Under the loop test. If you own some sort of magnifying lens, there are some things you can look for on the stone that might give away its identity:
A. Look at the rock from the top and see how well the facets (cuts on top of the diamond) are joined. They should be sharp not rolled.
B. Look at the girdle and see if it is faceted or frosty (a clear sign it’s a diamond) or waxy and slick (an indication it’s a fake).
C. While you’re looking at your stone under magnification, look into your stone to see if you detect any flaws (carbon, pinpoints, small cracks). These are typically clear indications it’s the real thing since it’s very hard to put inclusions in a fake.
D. After examining the stone, focus in on the stamps inside the setting. A stamp of "10K, 14K, 18K, 585, 750, 900, 950, PT, Plat" indicates the setting is real gold or platinum which gives a better chance that the stone in it is real as well. While you’re looking at the interior of the ring, also look for any "C.Z." stamps that would indicate the center stone is not a diamond.
I hope this helps all you Sherlock Holmes that want to know what you got.
by Fred Cuellar, author of the best-selling book "How to Buy a Diamond."