Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The loop at the top for a chain, leather strip, etc. to hang the cross is not how they were done. This one is soldered/brazed on...
It could have been added later I suppose...but if a true artifact passed down through family, not likely anyone would modify it...and essentially ruin it.
JMO
lol. We obviously have different opinions on what constitutes evidence...
lol. We obviously have different opinions on what constitutes evidence...
I think it is important to realize that lots of stuff passed down through families has been modified through the years, including furniture and particularly thinks like the cross. It is entirely conceivable that the loop could have been added to make it into a pendant. I'm not saying this is the case, but it wouldn't be the first time that happened. For me, the dating must come from the cross itself.
Jeff, it's to the point that nothing is happening,
Some of the worst detective work that should have been done long before the first shovel hit the dirt. Just more proof that the brothers are loony, spending their money hand over foot, and now the tax payer's, on something they are clueless on finding.
I was reffering to the additional support of treasure being found by the boys. Not the cross specifically. There was significant additonal evidence that treasure was found offered by the auther of the blog.ev·i·dence
/ˈevədəns/
noun
1. the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
The Blockhouse blog that you linked to simply restates what the author was told by Ms McInnis (that the cross was 600 years old, was not poured or moulded, etc...), without providing any facts or evidence indicating whether that statement is true or valid.
I am going with Captain Kidd for 400.00, Alex.
I was reffering to the additional support of treasure being found by the boys. Not the cross specifically. There was significant additonal evidence that treasure was found offered by the auther of the blog.
I am not saying this is true but i am saying it is worth further investigation before being dismiised as without merit