One thing to consider is that treasure trove laws have tightened up and they may not be able to get the permits needed to do much actual digging unless an exploratory hole shows a reason too. Likewise with environmental issues.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are right... But discussing the theories is part of the fun of watching a show like this....We can shoot holes in the show all day. It's like watching football, everyone wants to believe it's their team who hid some forgotten treasure should one ever be found, as if they would receive a share. Who goes to all the trouble to hide a treasure 100+ feet down then leaves their tools hanging in a tree over the covered hole? Who uses a metal detector when they could use ground penetrating radar? Where are the archaeologists? Were it not for all the advertising dollars from the shows sponsors I would say these guys were terrible investors, so I keep watching to see how long it takes them to realize it or 'discover' something.
Yep.. It would be a shame if it was the Arc of the Covent and the brothers smash it to bits with a drill bit.....I cringe at the thought of when people drill hard metal bits into the ground blindly, what if that pierces through a unique artifact?......
Yep no one has reached the bottom. This diagram gives a pretty good summary of what has been done..I have never seen anything mention that they had successfully reached the bottom of the money pit, every attempt has failed once the water flooded.
"The article hypothesizes that this was built in the 1700s. The dating of the eel grass is 13 or 1400s and the coconut fibers of a similar date therefore the explanation is not consistent with the dating. This is why I referred to the theory as silly. In order for the theory to be correct this would of had to been built back in 1400s."
Yes it does...or as Loki has said about the coconut fibers, the 1100's
I still contend that the fibers themselves may be that old and used many times as packing materials until the finally ended up in the box drain area....Loki says no, because wayfarers would not reuse these materials for so long. But since the fibers themselves were a commodity item (Nothing is free!) they could have traveled the world many times in many different ships holds and reused at each port of call to repack other items to ship. Why would they dispose of the fibers after just a voyage or two? Especially when the further from a port where new fibers were available, the more costly they would become...Once again Loki says no, they would be to degraded to use....BUT, as we have seen on the show, 900 years later, the ones retrieved are NOT to degraded to pick up in a clump, pulled apart by individual fibers and tested...and I would bet dried they could STILL be used for packing cargo.
Edit to add: Loki has also pointed out that no sailors would use old line, rope, or hawsers...true...but those were made of coconut fibers that could have been converted to packing material use when the uesfulness as a line or rope was over and the ship rerigged... this stuff was not free or cheap to move to different ports, so they would reuse them in whatever way they could until they literally were just dust..IMO
So that theory of them not lasting hundreds of years as packing material doesnt work for me...and then at some point being buried as a filtering material or even washed up after floating from a shipwreck or from a storm surge..
One other thing...years ago i worked as a warehouse man..shipping and receiving...some days we would have a hundred pallet loads of materials shipped in small boxes with the part and packing peanuts....and also sent out many pallet loads a day of parts packed in peanuts...did we toss out any peanuts? Nope...they were all reused as they cost money...same thing
Actually the last dating of the c. fibres was to the 14th century. In my opinion it is ridiculous to think that anybody would use centuries old vegetable matter for packing material, and then to think that it was also made from old rope. Remember, for one thing we are talking about the wealthiest of all the Catholic orders. And then to use it again as some kind of filter, LOL.
Once more I will mention that several Knights Templar vessels left Cyprus in 1307 (a location where coconut fibre was readily available), landing in France that same year at a location where there were other Templar ships. Within a couple of months all of these ships disappeared.
Its not styrofoam peanuts that last forever Rd, your talking apples and oranges as another poster has told me a couple of times.
Oh, one more thing, I never said the Templars buried anything on Oak Island, only that they passed through on their way to New Ross.
Another point I would like to clear up is the comment that a vessel sailing the nice calm Mediterranean wouldn't be capable of ocean travel. I live and sail on the Great Lakes, and I can tell you that any ship that can safely traverse these inland seas can also sail the oceans, with a noted exception, our very long and narrow Great Lakes freighters which could break in half in giant ocean swells.
Cheers, Loki
The Legend lives on form the Chippewa on down. of the big lake they call Gitchigoomee....
My sailing experience is only in California coastal waters as crew on a 60 foot schooner and on my personal 24 foot sailboat on inland waters...so can't address the use or non use of any Templar ships for sea crossings...But, i bet it was scary and fun at the same time!