Stretch Da Truth
Bronze Member
- Jan 13, 2017
- 1,038
- 1,097
- Detector(s) used
- XP Déus & a Carrot!
- Primary Interest:
- Metal Detecting
Mmmmmm, Cold Crow..... Whats that on the side?
Coconut fibers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
None. I have stated time and again I am just interested in debating the presented evidence. I can't make any conclusion of if there is/was/wasn't a treasure at this juncture without discussing the presented evidence first.
If you want me to speculate, I already have.
See it's the same thing over and over. People not listening. But I really don't blame any skeptic for listening as it would take a lot of work to disprove any of it.
1650
(sometime in 1600s) An old man dying says he was a crew member of Captain William Kidd, had assisted in burying an enormous treasure on a secluded island east of Boston. This legend is widely spread, with searches conducted over 100 years. [4.2][/QUOTE]
Captain William Kidd would have been 15 years old in 1650.
And the 1795 story of the "kids" finding the pit was first published in 1856. Some accounts say the pit was found in 1799.
... perhaps they deposited the treasure there.....
...There has never been any hypothesis, that by direct evidence or actual artifacts produced, that provides a positive proof, of said hypothesis......
...there has never been found any proof of any "treasure".
... Well, the definition of treasure doesn't appear to be JUST 1a or b does it?
So it may be the history of the activity is the treasure or just about ANYTHING deemed "rare or precious" by ANYONE. ....
I am honored to be considered a skeptic. But what makes you think you know how all skeptics think?
You seem to have a bigotry about "skeptics" and group us all in your narrow sleeve of identification like it was a shared genetic trait. It just means someone has doubts or reservations regarding a particular unproven premise. Any scientist should be a skeptic and constantly question new and old information. That's how new stuff is learned, and if it holds up to scrutiny it will eventually become accepted knowledge.
"Treasure" to me is anything of great value. That includes information on past history that was forgotten or previously unknown. Even uncommon fossils are treasure.
I could say you are a "dogmatist" for believing there is a treasure with no evidence or proof.