While it may not be inconceivable that someone would bury a stone of such nature at 90 feet, what would be the purpose, or the value, of doing so in code?
View attachment 1236497
Like the legend of King Arthur and the Sword Excalibur, in which once found only the worthy would be capable of claiming it.
These Renaissance Men during the time of Oak Island, whether Rosicrucian, Alchemists, Knights Templar or Freemasons also shared this desire, not to be buried or bury their treasure and be forgotten forever, but that a clue by way of a hidden stone may be found by one worthy enough to locate their burial site or temple vault.
The story has been re-enacted throughout the centuries from Solomon’s Temple to the Tomb of the Rosicrucian Christian Rosenkreuz leading up to what now may be the Tomb of Sir Francis Bacon, located on Oak Island.
I do not see the similarities. The sword stone was added to the Arthur legend by Robert de Boron around the 12th century. In it, after Uther Pendragon died, Arthur lived with Sir Ector until he and his brother were both given the opportunity to pull the sword from the stone in front of an assembled crowd. Where you might point to Rick and Marty playing the roles of Arthur and Sir Kay, where is the stone and the "magic" sword?
And Sir Francis Bacon hardly stirs the imagination in riches, or comes close to the semblance, of Solomon. As far as anyone is concerned, Sir Francis Bacon's tomb is in St Michael's Church, marked by a monument of him sitting, left hand supporting his head, and an epitaph, written by Sir Thomas Wooton.
Such an idea that he is connected to Oak Island is much the same as Mary Bauer Hall who claimed secret documents by him were hidden in a vault under a private church cemetery in Williamsburg, Virgina. In 1938 she finally convinced officials to dig in the cemetery, but nothing was found. (Hall also claimed he wrote the Magna Carta, but failed to explain how he could have done so 350 years BEFORE his birth.)
In 1992, Fletcher Richman, a member of a group known as the Sir Francis Bacon's Sages of the Seventh Seal, tried again. And failed. (this was followed by clandestine digging possibly by a different group)
In 2003, Richman tried for a third dig, claiming (wouldn't just know it) some of the tombstones code had been misread.
As one account says....
"Gesturing towards the pyramid shaped monument covering the centuries-old graves of David and Elizabeth Bray, Richman claimed, ’Underneath here is a spiral staircase that goes down to a freemasonry library’ — referring to the supposed 10-by-10-foot secret vault containing supposed buried Bacon document."
Church officials needless to say were not impressed.
Too, aside from his time at the French Embassy, Sir Francis Bacon traveled very little, and most certainly not to the Americas.
Now let us deal with the 90' stone. What clues were left instructing someone to that very spot on Oak Island to dig not 3 feet, not 10 feet, not 30 feet,
but 90 feet to find further instructions?
While 140 acres doesn't sound like a large parcel compared to Canada, it is huge in relation to the average city dwellers lot. (The average city block being roughly 2 acres means searching an area roughly 70 city blocks.)
And yet we are to believe that to prove you are worthy you are supposed to travel to the new world, with nothing more than thread bare instructions linking your trial to Oak Island and proceed to dig the equivalent of 70 city blocks down 90 feet to find further instructions?
For some reason that doesn't have the wisdom of Solomon ring to it.
Another problem seems to be the 90 foot stone claims "40 feet below....," while the pit has been excavated to some 190 feet. Has the stone been misinterpreted?