ECS
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2012
- Messages
- 11,638
- Reaction score
- 17,695
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Ocala,Florida
- Primary Interest:
- Other
The "Journals" that Diana Jean Muir allegedly found were stated to be COPIES thought to be from an earlier work.... the Journals of Sir Henry Sinclair are real and they span over 450 years or about 14 generations that have protected the Knight's Templar Treasures.
Diana Muir found them, translated them and is having them published slowly actually too slow for me...
There exists NO provenance for the trunk in which the copies and lambskin map were found, nor is there provenance for these journal copies and map.
There is NO proof that any "ORIGINAL" Journals of Prince Henry Sinclair ever existed, and there is that suspicion with the reference of "Prince" that these journals are a fabricated work derived from the Zeno fictional voyage that mentions "Prince Zichmni", not Sinclair.
As with far too many of these self published "history changing discovery" books, Muir has NEVER presented these journal copies or lambskin map to reputable academic historians for verification of authenticity.
Muir did show them to Scott Wolter, even with his less than credible reputation, hedged around claiming that they were legitimate Sinclair journals.
Joining many claimed Sinclair descendants before her, Muir perpetuates this fantasy voyage that has NO documented support beyond these revisionist pseudo pulp pages published for profit.
*NOTE* "St Clair of Rosslyn testified against the Templars at their trial in Edinburgh in 1309" -
"ROSSLYN AND THE GRAIL" -Mark Oxbrow & Ian Robertson
The Sinclair family were NOT Templars.
Last edited: