I was surprised to read this as your posts have been for the most part well written and insightful. However, before you go too far it would be wise too re-research the things that you feel to be incorrect. Father Kino was, because of shifting land titles and politics, neither Italian nor Spanish. The absolute date of the stones discovery is and must remain an unknown because of the secrecy involved. 49 or 52, it really just depends on what one believes and there is always the chance that we are dealing with multiple discovery dates. Jesuits in the Superstition? I would suggest that you dig deeper - Phil R. may have something to contribute here. I was told that evidence of Jesuit occupation in the Superstitions was found (I have not seen any proof of this first hand). Do you know how much Waltz paid for his plot of land in 68? Did it require a fortune? Others had money enough to buy their plots without the benefit of a mysterious mine so, why not Waltz? He obviously could not have been destitute upon his arrival in the area. These really are unrelated topics in my opinion.
Hal:
As far as politics or allegiance, Kino was neither Italian nor Spanish, but betrothed to the company of Jesus.
It still remains, though, that Kino was born in in the village of Segno, in the sovereign Prince-bishopric of Trent (Northern Italy) and so therefore was not "from Spain."
As far as how old the Stone Maps are, or when they were discovered, it still remains that they first entered public consciousness in 1949, and unless superseded by concrete evidence indicating otherwise, that date is pretty much considered to be the official one.
And as far as evidence of Jesuit activity in the Supes, I think your statement is pretty explanatory:
I was told that evidence of Jesuit occupation in the Superstitions was found (I have not seen any proof of this first hand).
I furthermore have not seen any evidence put forth by Phil, either. He hasn't spoken much in this thread other than to insult Frank which I thought was uncalled for.
And as for Waltz, I will confess that I may be in error regarding his filing for an homestead as proof that he had found wealth prior to 1868. The SMM website states that:
Old timers claim Waltz prospected every winter between 1868-1886.
And for those hoping that the show will help to clear much of the misunderstanding about the Supes, I fear the opposite may be true.
For example, the last shot at the end of the first episode is a shot of what appears to be a Jesuit cross inset in stone, and this is allegedly "somewhere in the Supes":
It is very obviously a prop, and why they chose to do something so blatantly misleading like this, I have absolutely no idea as we don't know the context of that shot just yet, but my feeling right now is that it (as well as the show in general) will only add to the confusion, or myths, rather than provide clarity, as far as the history and story of the Superstition Mountains.