- May 9, 2012
- 23,974
- 81,372
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Just to be clear about motive, I was writing about Travis and his carving of the stones, not Frank's decision to walk away which, imho, was inevitable.
But, Frank as a "barometer", leading to a red flag... not sure that anyone here would be a better gauge.
Yessir. Understood. My mentioning Franks motive threw you off.
My speculation of motive regarding Travis so far from others input......
Take away his name first and focus on the character.
Youth/background, formal and informal education and having a foot on both sides of the law so to speak.
Add in public perception and how to affect it.
Where did the Dutchman acquire his wealth? Who saw him actually do so?
Many people knew,or claimed to know,yet actual proof?
Now transfer that perception to another character with a map or maps.
Once map or maps are made public it suggests they are no longer of use to the party revealing it/them.
IF that revealing party has incurred wealth that needs to be justified as to the source...there are the maps regardless of the wealth's source.
A map could well have been original , and either unintelligible or the end of it's trail tapped out...does not matter in the public perception game.
My perception can or will change if more info surfaces.
I don't demonise Travis for any possible wrongdoing ,there have been many such characters in the past with land grants being but one example.
His background suits treasure hunting. Was the public at the time convinced he was successful?
Were the stones ,real or partly real, or fake , enough to justify his lifestyle and any show of wealth?
Knowing what capital he had and where it was acquired might be telling,or not. But public perception simply from maps displayed and desert trips could cover his tracks at the time. ?
A possible motive.