Hi Roy,
You have convinced me that there was some Jesuit mining in Mexico. I think I have said that before.
The Jesuit Order had many enemies around the world and probably double the norm in Mexico. All were busy looking for any excuse to bend the king's ear against the order. I still maintain that any secret mining would have been very difficult for them to pull off.
The main reason for that belief for that is the great number of constant visitations to the missions, and the inordinate searching for precious metals by........others. Those others knew where to search for gold and silver. History tells us that the Jesuits placed their missions near plentiful water supplies, natives for conversion and mines that needed priests to tend to the needs of the miners and the people who were required to support those endeavors.
That being said, I still have doubts that every utterance of a Jesuit that mentioned silver or gold meant they were involved in mining. I seem to remember, somewhere in the dim past, reading that they were tasked by the king to record the financial dealings of some of the mines. Must admit I have little desire to dig through my library to find that mentioning.
As I'm sure you remember, I was seeking "Jesuit" treasure for many years. Even though I no longer believe in those treasures as a common occurrence, I have to admit a grudging fondness for the genre.
I wish you good luck and a golden future.
Take care,
Joe
Well I am not that sure the mining operations were really "secret" at all, just not broadcast. There are a number of references to the padres desire to keep Spanish colonists OUT of the mission districts, which hints at keeping the mines not secret but not spread like the California gold rush, or the Arizonac silver rush. In other words QUIET mining not "secret" per se.
I am having trouble reading that paragraph and sentence, in a way that does not link the Jesuits with mining. Let me break it down sentence by sentence:
The many affairs, the constant couriers (in the year 1753, two reams of paper did not suffice to answer letters and to write new letters, so that I do not even find time for the breviary and other spiritual exercises), the ceaseless daily guests; among whom are the most important people of these provinces such as governors, local officials, military officers, all with very many servants, who use my mission without ever paying for even the smallest thing.
Segesser is buried in work, has an endless stream of visitors who use "his" mission without ever paying - right? Am I getting this sentence interpreted correctly? Next:
All these exhaust me to such an extent that I frequently do not know where my head is. I must take care of and arrange everything that concerns kitchen, garden, fields, seedling box, cattle and horses, chickens, doves, geese, pigs, and mule.
Segesser complains that he must manage everything. Correct?
In a word, both church and household all depend on me.
Segesser is saying that every operation is dependent on himself, right?
I can find no loyal servants in this land, because they quickly become arrogant and demand that the missionary wait on them.
Segesser can not find good hired managers, apparently had some bad experiences with hired foremen, correct?
In addition they cost five to six hundred Spanish thalers, and that requires much sweat and toil to obtain.
He tells us how much it would cost to hire a foreman or overseer, and that amount would take a lot of labor to come up with - right?
Because of the constant unrest among the Indians, one cannot work in the silver and gold mines.
This very next sentence, after saying that the cost of hiring an overseer would take much labor, tells us that due to the Indian troubles, "one" cannot work in the silver and gold mines. Right?
If he is not talking about his OWN mines, to be worked by his OWN Indians, why would he bother to mention this at all? The very next sentence also links to this:
Last week eighty Apache attacked and killed a pastor and seven servants who were traveling from his parish house to the home of a sick person to hear a confession.
The Apaches killed a pastor and servants, while on religious duties. Correct?
Apache on one side surround my mission, Seri on the other side.
Segesser's mission is literally surrounded by enemies.
Also, some of the Pima are hostile and cause me very great damage.
Even some of the 'friendly' Indians are nearly as dangerous as the Apaches and Seris. Right?
This letter was written and sent from San Miguel de los Ures, April 28, 1754. What does father Nentvig tell us about Ures?
Finally we arrive at
Ures, the head mission in charge of Father Andrés Michel since the death of
Father Felipe Ségesser [September 28, 1761]. Its geographical position is 30 degrees latitude by 264 degrees, 20 minutes longitude. Its dependent mission, Santa Rosalía, is twelve leagues to the southwest. The real of San José de Gracia is seven leagues west, and the deserted real of Antúnez is six leagues northwest. San Miguel de Horcasitas is about ten leagues west of Ures, and Nacameri, the dependent mission of Opodepe, is six leagues northeast of Antúnez. Nacameri is inhabited by Eudebes, while the Indians in Opodepe are Pimas. Opodepe,
[SUP]31[/SUP][SUP][/SUP] where we are going out of curiosity, at 30 degrees, 40 minutes latitude and 264 degrees, 3 minutes longitude, is six leagues almost due north of Nacameri.
[SUP]32[/SUP][SUP][/SUP] One league north is the real
[page 98]
of San José,
[SUP]33[/SUP][SUP][/SUP] and two leagues beyond, there used to be a settlement of gente de razón, breeders of cattle.
The mission of Opodepe, ministered by the Rector Francisco Loaiza, has silver and gold mines within its district, the latter having the reputation of producing ore with the highest fineness, and I have seen a piece of gold without rocky mixture weighing seven ounces.
Notice that Nentvig specifically mentions the Real of San Jose', and that there was a settlement of 'gentlemen of reason' (gente de razon). If all these mines are really Spanish or 'gente de razon' then why does he bother to mention where some ARE, and others no mention?
I think a big part of our difficulties in this debate is on the issue of SCALE. There are treasure legends with almost ridiculous amounts of gold and silver involved, which would have left scars on the Earth like the Homestake mine if they were true. At the other end of the scale, the operations were more than what father Och described in his bit of copper picking (technically he was placer mining copper) for making some bells. Otherwise why should there be mounds of slag at the missions, which were apparently there when the Franciscans built the now-visible mission churches, so one could say this points to the smelting having occurred prior to the Franciscans arrival. The padres were running not just mines but also cattle raising, sheep, horses, mules, fields of corn and grain, had their own gardens to tend, making leather, just as Segesser (and at least one other padre) complained about, a whole community of various different business operations even including lending money like banks in some places.
I have never been able to trace the origins of the legend of Jesuit treasure and/or mines in the Superstitions. It seems to have cropped up after the Peralta story, perhaps from some treasure writer trying to mix together different stories as has happened all too often with treasure legends. If you should find the time to go through your rather impressive library, I would appreciate if you could locate the oldest story you know of, that refers to a Jesuit treasure and/or mine(s) in the Superstition mountains. Beth has made me pack up a big part of our own books while trying to get the interior done in the living room so only a few relevant books are handy (apparently I boxed up Unknown Arizona by Manje for example, as I looked for it yesterday) of course when that work is done I can search for myself but if you have the time and inclination I would appreciate it.