Ditlihi
Banned
- Aug 20, 2016
- 1,227
- 4,793
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
The Black Book was mostly written as an allegory, IMO. Of course Jesse James was neither all those people nor a participant in all the deeds covered in the book. However, I suspect the key message may have been that those named influential people themselves (not James himself) were private members of a clandestine group and some of the events recounted may have gone down as described (not necessarily with James as the protagonist). When looked at this way, the book becomes food for thought instead of a joke.
I agree that much James lore may be balderdash, but relying on ad hominem attacks against various contributors is a slippery slope on which it's hard to keep your bearings. Unless you somehow have real skin in the game, you're forced to take sides based on your best guess of what the facts really are. Trouble is, facts can be created, destroyed and altered in ways beyond our abilities to detect. As Tolstoy said, "History would be a wonderful thing if only it were true."
I agree, and I believe that was the intention behind the suggestion we separate the wheat from the chaff by assigning these stories a category to develope a working model. When we establish what is what, we can then winnow out what we know has no basis in fact and concentrate on establishing the TRUE facts. Unfortunately our task is made much more difficult by over a century of obfuscation. And I DO believe there has been a concerted effort TO obfuscate the truth in this instance. For what purpose it remains to be seen.