Oroblanco
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2005
- Messages
- 7,841
- Reaction score
- 9,872
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- DAKOTA TERRITORY
- Detector(s) used
- Tesoro Lobo Supertraq, (95%) Garrett Scorpion (5%)
Re: has montezuma's tomb been found ...?
I have to propose that to locate the tomb of Montezuma we ought to turn to the original sources, and (if memory serves) the dead body of Montezuma was turned over to the Aztecs at the palace in Tenochtitlan, and there the trail goes cold. At least it does for me.
Then we have Amerindian legends of Montezuma being entombed in Arizona, but at Montezuma Head, not in the Superstitions. The Superstitions have a tremendous "draw" for some folks and it seems that legends get translocated into the Superstitions with no good reason - as if there were not already enough legends there. I think it is not only a mean trick to do, but is taking away something from the numerous other places with intriguing legends, like Montezuma Head. Blindbowman has not answered my question as to why the Amerindians would have such a legend attached to Montezuma Head if the Aztec king were actually buried in the Superstitions. The way things are getting translocated, we could as well place the tomb of King Arthur there and the Lost Ark of the Covenant, with equally thin proof to back up the theories.
I suspect that Blindbowman MIGHT be mis-interpreting some or much of the information he is obtaining through the use of "remote-viewing" or "Shamanistic" methods - that many of these things, such as an image of the Aztec king, are SYMBOLIC in nature and NOT literal, but that Blindbowman, despite his penchant for working out codes, is not seeing these things as symbolic but as LITERAL. Only field investigation can prove or disprove his theories, and here we are falling short.
Oroblanco
I have to propose that to locate the tomb of Montezuma we ought to turn to the original sources, and (if memory serves) the dead body of Montezuma was turned over to the Aztecs at the palace in Tenochtitlan, and there the trail goes cold. At least it does for me.
Then we have Amerindian legends of Montezuma being entombed in Arizona, but at Montezuma Head, not in the Superstitions. The Superstitions have a tremendous "draw" for some folks and it seems that legends get translocated into the Superstitions with no good reason - as if there were not already enough legends there. I think it is not only a mean trick to do, but is taking away something from the numerous other places with intriguing legends, like Montezuma Head. Blindbowman has not answered my question as to why the Amerindians would have such a legend attached to Montezuma Head if the Aztec king were actually buried in the Superstitions. The way things are getting translocated, we could as well place the tomb of King Arthur there and the Lost Ark of the Covenant, with equally thin proof to back up the theories.
I suspect that Blindbowman MIGHT be mis-interpreting some or much of the information he is obtaining through the use of "remote-viewing" or "Shamanistic" methods - that many of these things, such as an image of the Aztec king, are SYMBOLIC in nature and NOT literal, but that Blindbowman, despite his penchant for working out codes, is not seeing these things as symbolic but as LITERAL. Only field investigation can prove or disprove his theories, and here we are falling short.
Oroblanco