This might be why we are having trouble finding any info on them.
Fifa Defends World Cup Against Pepsi Ambush Marketing
While football fans have been enjoying the World Cup, off the pitch FIFA has been cracking down on companies and individuals attempting to "ambush" the 2002 FIFA World Cup through various activities infringing its intellectual property rights.
Since the conclusion of the 1998 World Cup in France, FIFA has been using a specialized "anti-ambush" team, comprising trademark specialists, commercial lawyers and sports marketing specialists. Their strategy for this World Cup began with a worldwide trademark registration program of "FIFA World Cup," the official mascots, the official emblem and the FIFA World Cup Trophy. These measures were taken to ensure that FIFA is in strong position to protect and enforce its intellectual property rights and the rights of the official partners, the official suppliers and licensees.
One of the highest profile examples of FIFA's enforcement activities involves the soft drink manufacturer Pepsico. Although Coca-Cola is one of the FIFA World Cup's official partners, rival Pepsico has produced advertisements that suggest a sponsorship relationship between it and the FIFA World Cup.
On 5 June, an Argentinean court ordered Pepsico to immediately cease the use of an advertisement. The court found that the prohibited advertisement would cause confusion among consumers as it suggested a "presumed sponsorship relationship" between Pepsico and the FIFA World Cup. The advertisement in question combined the use of the phrase "Tokyo 2002," famous footballers and other football imagery in association with the logo of Pepsico. The court ordered Pepsico not to use the advertisement on TV, in printed media or by any other means.
Had FIFA decided not to act, its inactivity would have diminished the value of its trademarks as well as the exclusivity of agreements with official partners such as Coca-Cola. Patrick Magyar, CEO of FIFA Marketing, commented, "FIFA regrets that corporations engage in ambush marketing activities, and is particularly disappointed to see a global company like Pepsico employing these below-the-belt techniques that harm the FIFA World Cup - they should know better. Pepsico knows full well that all marketing rights and benefits of the FIFA World Cup are exclusively granted to the official partners, official suppliers and licensees, whose significant financial support helps stage this great event and enhances the FIFA World Cup experience for fans in Korea and Japan and throughout the world."
The Argentinean court order comes on the heels of Pepsico's claims earlier in the week that their advertising will not mention the FIFA World Cup. However, this is not the only promotion related to the FIFA World Cup which has caused Pepsico to be in hot water with FIFA: in Ecuador, FIFA has also instructed counsel to initiate legal proceedings against Pepsico as a result of similar TV commercials; and in Mexico, Pepsico is in the midst of negotiations with FIFA to settle a case involving the unauthorized use of FIFA's trademark-protected emblem of "2002 FIFA World Cup."
Businesses spend considerable time and substantial sums of money devising brands and marketing their products or services. This investment should be protected whenever possible by registering trade names, logos, strap-lines and other trademarks. If a trademark is registered, the registration gives the owner a monopoly right in that country to use the mark in respect of the goods or services in which it is registered and provides protection against infringement.
I got this from this link:
http://www.brandchannel.com/features_effect.asp?pf_id=103
If that is the pepsi logo maybe they had to pull all of their ads and promo items for legal reasons. Charlie