Forrest Fenn s treasure

[G.I.B.]

Hmm.... new plan.

I can't email the solution to FF. I'm not positive that he is the only one that gets his email.

So I send it and some unknown person responds and eloquently tells me it was a valiant effort, nicely done, but in the end, I solved for the wrong place.

Then they go get the treasure.

Crap- can't trust anybody.

I'll just have to go get it myself.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[Bloodline]

Ask fenn if he loves lucifer.
He will never say yes or no.
To say "yes" would be admission and to say "no" would be a denial.

...and he will never say, there's no such thing.

 

[Bloodline]

Ask fenn if he loves lucifer.
He will never say yes or no.
To say "yes" would be admission and to say "no" would be a denial.

...and he will never say, there's no such thing.

You laugh and say to yourself 'o he's crazy.

I say, all of you working this hunt, put him on the spot and ASK.

 

[MiddenMonster]

Ask fenn if he loves lucifer.
He will never say yes or no.
To say "yes" would be admission and to say "no" would be a denial.

You laugh and say to yourself 'o he's crazy.

I say, all of you working this hunt, put him on the spot and ASK.

You're developing quite a telling pattern here, Bloodline. You're all to ready to chime in with a gratuitous, unsupported claim. But when asked to provide some real evidence to back it up you go radio silent. So how about I put you on the spot? What is your best evidence that Fenn is connected to anything sinister? Don't direct us to your web pages or YouTube channels. Lay it on us here, so we can see it and analyze it the same way we can analyze anything else. You can't do it, which is why I'm saying that you don't even take what you are saying seriously. Prove me wrong. Put some evidence of what you are claiming on the table here. Make it up out of whole cloth, if you want. I'm prepared to deal with that, but it would at least mean you are trying.

 

[Bloodline]

EVERYONE ASK FENN !

 

[Bloodline]

It takes only 1 of you to ask and put him on the spot.

Prove me wrong, I dare you.

 

[G.I.B.]

...

 

[Bloodline]

...

..I like that..lol.

But seriously someone out there prove me wrong. Fenn, Stadther and the rest of the 12 are all luciferians... and there is more to this hunt then anyone as told you.

 

[MiddenMonster]

It takes only 1 of you to ask and put him on the spot.

Prove me wrong, I dare you.

OK, I'll prove you wrong by using your own statements and some logic 101. Let's look at what you posted just a short time ago:

Ask fenn if he loves lucifer.
He will never say yes or no.
To say "yes" would be admission and to say "no" would be a denial

Now you just post stating that it "takes only 1 of you to ask and put him on the spot" in order to prove you wrong. So let's see how this plays out:

1. One of us puts Fenn on the spot and asks him if he loves Lucifer.

2. Fenn says "yes". You are proven correct by Fenn's admission.

3. Fenn says "no". You are proven correct by Fenn's denial.

4. Fenn remains silent, not answering yes or no. You are proven correct because any of the alternative answers Fenn provides proves you correct.

You are logically proven wrong because there is no way for Fenn to not be guilty of what you are claiming. In a court of law this is analogous to assuming facts not in evidence. It would be like asking someone if they still beat their wife. If they say yes, it means they are currently beating their wife. If they say no, it means they used to beat their wife. Either way they are a wife beater, even if they don't wear the required T-shirt. You set up a scenario with a predetermined outcome, with no way to not arrive at the conclusion for which you have been unable to provide evidence. Facts, brother! Provide us some facts that can be used as evidence to support these devil worshiping claims. If those facts are correct, you win. If they aren't, at least you still have your YouTube videos.

On further examination of the logical structure of your request, there is a way Fenn can prove he is not in league with Satan:

1. One of us puts Fenn on the spot and asks him if he loves Lucifer.

2. Fenn says "Yabba Dabba Doo!". You are proven incorrect, but Fenn is perceived as crazy, and not in a Patsy Cline kind of way.

 

[Bloodline]

IMO

If he says "yes".. I would simply think, what was the proof, that convinced such a interesting man to follow such a liar.

If he says "no".. my thinking to this is... I don't believe its in his vocabulary to even say it, because he's that devote.

So I'm assuming one of the following scenarios will happen if anyone ask.

he will ignore you.

No one will ever get the opportunity.

he will respond with something clever, but never really give you a direct answer. Meaning, you'll think "what did he just say"?

hes completely done with the public and will go off on some beach somewhere and sit back with Stadther and watch his world on his laptop and the pair will start over or convince themselves on some level, they accomplished what they sit out to do.. to save face, from those who hired them to do all of this to begin with.

..One of those will happen.

 

[MiddenMonster]

Thank you for proving my point.

If he says "yes".. I would simply think, what was the proof, that convinced such a interesting man to follow such a liar.

Correlates with my Point #2: "Fenn says "yes". You are proven correct by Fenn's admission."

If he says "no".. my thinking to this is... I don't believe its in his vocabulary to even say it, because he's that devote.

Correlates with my Point #3: "Fenn says "no". You are proven correct by Fenn's denial."

So I'm assuming one of the following scenarios will happen if anyone ask.

he will ignore you.

No one will ever get the opportunity.

he will respond with something clever, but never really give you a direct answer. Meaning, you'll think "what did he just say"?

Correlates with my Point #4: "Fenn remains silent, not answering yes or no. You are proven correct because any of the alternative answers Fenn provides proves you correct."

Since falsification is an essential component of any valid hypothesis, it is clear that your hypothesis, i.e. that Forrest Fenn is in league with satanists and out to cause mischief is not valid, because it cannot be falsified. As you have constructed it, there is no way for Fenn to not be as you describe. There is nothing he can say or do that will prove your claims to be false. He is guilty because of your accusation, not because of facts or any other evidence that would tend toward supporting your claim, because there aren't any. You have yet to provide a single shred of proof to support those claims. So let's try the reverse, since you have laid it out in the form of a question. What would Fenn have to say or do that would show your claims to be false and incorrect?

 

[Hobo]

Why does the F.F. treasure attract so many whackadoddles?

 

[H-2 CHARLIE]

Because you want to believe its real and your willing to believe in it . Haha

 

[Bloodline]

Thank you for proving my point.



Correlates with my Point #2: "Fenn says "yes". You are proven correct by Fenn's admission."



Correlates with my Point #3: "Fenn says "no". You are proven correct by Fenn's denial."



Correlates with my Point #4: "Fenn remains silent, not answering yes or no. You are proven correct because any of the alternative answers Fenn provides proves you correct."

Since falsification is an essential component of any valid hypothesis, it is clear that your hypothesis, i.e. that Forrest Fenn is in league with satanists and out to cause mischief is not valid, because it cannot be falsified. As you have constructed it, there is no way for Fenn to not be as you describe. There is nothing he can say or do that will prove your claims to be false. He is guilty because of your accusation, not because of facts or any other evidence that would tend toward supporting your claim, because there aren't any. You have yet to provide a single shred of proof to support those claims. So let's try the reverse, since you have laid it out in the form of a question. What would Fenn have to say or do that would show your claims to be false and incorrect?

Answer "No" and I would believe him.

 

[G.I.B.]

OK, I called FF's Gallery and they asked him for me.

He said, "No"

So, there you have it. Proof.

 

[MiddenMonster]

OK, I called FF's Gallery and they asked him for me.

He said, "No"

So, there you have it. Proof.

LMFAO!!!

 

[MiddenMonster]

Answer "No" and I would believe him.

OK, so you would believe him. How then, would you atone for and justify the slander/libel (depending on how you view forum speech), calumny and defamation you have laid on him the last several days? You didn't just say you thought these things about him. You made specific allegations of the worst kind against a person you have probably never met. He says, "No", and you just shrug and say, "Oops! My bad." and that's that? Your saying that you would believe him seems pretty flippant and nonchalant in light of everything you have said before. In fact, why should we believe you? You claimed that Forrest Fenn was in league with Satan. If you really believed that, why would you believe his denial? I'd like to see the twisted rational that could get that to make sense.

 

[Bloodline]

OK, so you would believe him. How then, would you atone for and justify the slander/libel (depending on how you view forum speech), calumny and defamation you have laid on him the last several days? You didn't just say you thought these things about him. You made specific allegations of the worst kind against a person you have probably never met. He says, "No", and you just shrug and say, "Oops! My bad." and that's that? Your saying that you would believe him seems pretty flippant and nonchalant in light of everything you have said before. In fact, why should we believe you? You claimed that Forrest Fenn was in league with Satan. If you really believed that, why would you believe his denial? I'd like to see the twisted rational that could get that to make sense.

Because the group is devote in their belief and to answer "no", he would not be of this group.

I already know his answer.
I'm just trying to get "anyone" to know it also. People should know the real man behind the "chase" and what he's chasing and why.

So ask him and watch him dance.


mm...let me ask you the same question, maybe your of the group also? The question is simple and a simple yes or no will do?

Can you answer..yes or no? Or will you scoff more and dance also and avoid the question??

 

[G.I.B.]

Because the group is devote in their belief and to answer "no", he would not be of this group.

So ask him and watch him dance.

When I heard the woman who answered the phone ask him, he simply said, "No".

I didn't hear anything that sounded like dancing.

I also didn't relate your accusations, so they didn't know why I asked.

 

[MiddenMonster]

Because the group is devote in their belief and to answer "no", he would not be of this group.

I already know his answer.
I'm just trying to get "anyone" to know it also. People should know the real man behind the "chase" and what he's chasing and why.

So ask him and watch him dance.

OK, I see. So you were lying to us. That does wonders for your credibility. But the truth is we already know you were lying to us because you don't have any facts to back up what you are saying. If you did, you would have presented them to us. At least be honest and admit that. I mean, we're kind of past that whole "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" thing now. You have a bug up your butt about a guy for whom you feel the need to lie about, slander and otherwise defame.

mm...let me ask you the same question, maybe your of the group also? The question is simple and a simple yes or no will do?

No.