Finders Keepers USA Dents Run National Press Release

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have only posted 25% of the Dents Run story and the rest is on hold. As I said many times there are things I will not or can not talk about yet. Why , We need to keep some info for a book or TV show or in Federal Court. Everything I say can be used against me in court so ya things sound twisted because I am trying to tell so much but holding back info I can not talk about. We sent out 16 pages of info that went to all the news media that talks about the FBI dig BUT there is a lot more to this story and it gets BIGGER each week. Below are things I will not talk about yet.

1, What proof do I have about the history of this wagon train and Connors. I gave everything to the FBI and they checked it all out and this is one reason they came in and dug.
2, How did I locate a map to find the site.
3, What is the FBI investigating .
4, Do we have pictures of the FBI night dig.
5, How did all that gold get to Dents Run.
6, Are there more sites like this in the north and was the KGC involved.
 

Why post at all then?

Chub
 

Why start yet another thread without definitive proof ? Will the next thread be another 25%? Isnt this already 100% of what you have?What is the difference between this and the previous threads?

Lets just lock this one until next time.

chub
 

The story does not get, “BIGGER” each week, it just fades into obscurity much like the “Templar vault and graves found” announcement several years ago.
 

4, Do we have pictures of the FBI night dig.

You may want to re watch your own video you posted, this was answered by one of your associates. He said that No, you don't, that he thought they had camera "jammers".

But this contradicts what you posted a few years ago, where you indicate you did have night photo's and even posted a night photo.

As has been the case with other evidence, how it is viewed, presented or ignored, depends on what narrative one is trying to prove or disprove.
 

Last edited:
3, What is the FBI investigating .

By your own testimony, you don't know this as you haven't gained any access to their files yet and you've also testified that they are liars and dishonest, so anything they told you, can't be relied upon as truth either.
 

Why post at all then?

Chub

Good Question, We worked with the FBI for 2 months before the dig happened and YES they are on this site everyday looking at whats posted. They keep track of everything going on here. They would like to know what info we have and what we are up to. So I post info for them to read , some info may be off or twisted just to keep them going. They would like this story to go away so I am sure they bash what I post but we just keep posting . If you don't think the FBI and DCNR are some of the members posting here as treasure hunting friends , You are wrong. Think again.
 

Good Question, We worked with the FBI for 2 months before the dig happened and YES they are on this site everyday looking at whats posted. They keep track of everything going on here. They would like to know what info we have and what we are up to. So I post info for them to read , some info may be off or twisted just to keep them going. They would like this story to go away so I am sure they bash what I post but we just keep posting . If you don't think the FBI and DCNR are some of the members posting here as treasure hunting friends , You are wrong. Think again.

I disagree, i doubt the FBI has wasted one single minute following this forum worrying about what a bunch of internet keyboard warriors are posting.
 

Some think it was to hide the dig. ? Mr deep they have been hiding the dig for THREE years..if nothing was found why can't they show the proof? Safely assume is purely double talk and all you deliver .why won't you answer my question...WHY DID THEY BOOT FK FROM THE SITE .there is only one reason they hide the truth and you know it...

What would that be? A big box of nothingness. You have that already.
 

“They would like to know what info we have and what we are up to. So I post info for them to read , some info may be off or twisted just to keep them going.”


That speaks volumes. Reminds me of a similar comment last year that ruffled a few feathers if I remember correctly.
 

“They would like to know what info we have and what we are up to. So I post info for them to read , some info may be off or twisted just to keep them going.”


That speaks volumes. Reminds me of a similar comment last year that ruffled a few feathers if I remember correctly.

This makes an interesting paradox of one of t-nets rules in my mind. I'm on thin ice here though, so I'm not willing to test it out.
 

So I post info for them to read , some info may be off or twisted just to keep them going. .

In other words, you are admitting that some of what you post isn't completely truthful (twisted) as you are purposely being deceitful to "keep them going". (mods, please note, i am not accusing him of being dishonest, he is admitting himself to being deceitful). Your argument for years has been that they are dishonest, only to now learn that you admit to being deceitful too.

Your whole case became corrupt and your credibility completely lost, the moment you just uttered those words. Now everything you have ever posted leaves us with the question of whether it was truthful or dishonest, all depending on whether you wanted to play games with the FBI, while other statements are true just because you say so?!

To "Twist" words from the Idiom dictionary:
To alter, distort, or misrepresent the intended meaning of something one has said or written.


misrepresent
[ˌmisˌreprəˈzent]
VERB
give a false or misleading account of the nature of.
 

Last edited:
He did not say he post lies so tread very carefully.
 

The fact that this thread survived 10 pages is a testament to Treasure_Hunter's patience. Wasn't just a couple years ago that we saw the same basic thing posted? Give it rest already for God's sake!
 

Just to clarify .....is it against the rules to twist things to keep it going?..... or not?
It is against the rules to lie about a find, he never said he lied, he said "some info may be off or twisted ", that can encompass a lot of things that would not violate our rules. Example saying you found a gold ring on Miami beach when you actually found it on Daytona beach would not be grounds for any mod action. Saying you found a ring you instead bought would be. Calling a member a liar will get a member banned much faster than a member misleading where he found a ring or treasure.
 

Everything I posted is true , I just held back some info and told it in a way that only the FBI knew the answer and only the FBI knew what questions to ask here for info they needed.
 

I just spat my mouth full all over the keyboard. Geez credibility was wavering-but if someone can't shoot straight what's the point really?
 

Everything I posted is true , I just held back some info and told it in a way that only the FBI knew the answer and only the FBI knew what questions to ask here for info they needed.

You indicated a few years ago that you did have night photo's from the trail cams and even posted a night photo, yet an associate of yours just said in the video you do not have night photos.

You say everything you say is true, and I can not accuse you of lying (nor would i on this forum) as that is against forum rules, but then that means by default, your associate was being dishonest during a press release to the public and the press. Are you going to have him issue a correction to the media?

Again, it speaks to credibility. You are accusing the FBI of dishonesty, all the while engaging in your own games by "twisting" the facts, and posting things that are "off" and putting out contradicting statements on evidence to the press, the public and by default, tnet members.
 

Last edited:
Everything I posted is true , I just held back some info and told it in a way that only the FBI knew the answer and only the FBI knew what questions to ask here for info they needed.

I just re-read this and did a double take. You are posting in code, to communicate with deep cell incognito FBI agents implanted in this forum who are looking for answers to info they need.

Interesting, but wouldn't it be easier to just pick up a secure phone and then you don't risk your code being cracked?
 

Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom