Duckshot
Silver Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2014
- Messages
- 4,455
- Reaction score
- 9,643
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Read this again FK, here you are admitting you actually have no idea what was actually on the scan. Enviroscan may have told you it was a large metallic mass, consistent with gold, but without seeing the scan, they too could be dishonest.
Again, this is more circumstantial evidence, from your own mouth, that supports you don't actually know for sure what was in the ground and by default, also supports the ever growing pile of evidence that no gold was found and dug up.
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
And it is clear the FBI is with holding information that could prove or disprove FK's claim. Why would the FBI want to fuel speculation? This could all be put to rest if more information was available.