- Thread starter
- #181
What can you tell us about this image you found, Sdcfia. It does have the fangs, the Google eyes and what could be tears. It also looks like there might be more stuff by it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What can you tell us about this image you found, Sdcfia. It does have the fangs, the Google eyes and what could be tears. It also looks like there might be more stuff by it.
Very strong resemblance, Steve. Too strong to discount. Is he possibly near a watering hole of some sort? I realize that is a much drier terrain there, just curious.
Edit: Sorry, Mdog, didn't see your post before I chimed in, lol.
The carving is at a site with hundreds of petroglyphs of widely differing ages and styles. The site is right above a spring in the Cookes Range on an ancient east-west trail later used as part of the Butterfield route. There are also structure ruins and bedrock mortars, indicating some level of occupation. The site is alleged to contain a back-filled chamber of some sort, but is closely monitored by the BLM as a cultural study site. Allegedly, Estevanico left a carving here, but I've never been able to find it. Further east - all the way to the Rio Grande - other similar fanged faces have been found. Below are a some other interesting finds there. The cat tracks are very close to the google-eyed guy. The last photo is the covered up place.
View attachment 1499419 View attachment 1499420
View attachment 1499421 View attachment 1499422
View attachment 1499423 View attachment 1499424
Thanks SDC. You mention an east-west trail and more of the fanged faces being found. Can you tell me if the other fanged faces are found near the trail and other springs? Thank you.
Mdog did you notice on SDC second photo just below the mouth, that shape sure looks like the same as whats at your site.
Mdog did you notice on SDC second photo just below the mouth, that shape sure looks like the same as whats at your site.
Are you talking about the owl shape just under the mouth?
Mdog did you notice on SDC second photo just below the mouth, that shape sure looks like the same as whats at your site.
Interesting name for that site. This WI woman has done a boatload of research into copper and other ancient artifacts, mostly from her part of the country. I used to get a monthly newsletter, but those ended. Copper Artifact Master Database - Grimms Etc
Yes, the old trail followed springs, which are hard to identify now except for small clusters of petroglyphs. The fanged face was found in the Goodsight Mountains and the Rough and Ready Hills, as I remember. I recall seeing photos of it somewhere north of Las Cruces too, but I'm not sure where.
Here's Sdc's picture of the bearded man next to one of my pictures.
View attachment 1499920 View attachment 1499921
Mine shows a bearded man on the right side and a shadow owl to the left and up. If that image below the mouth in Sdc's picture was fashioned to look like an owl and if the bearded man is close to the fanged guy, then these are two similar setups because the round headed guy is just around the corner of the bluff in my picture. How far away is your bearded man from your fanged man, Sdc. Fangs for your time.
Yes Sdc, it does have a very interesting name and it is an interesting place. In my post #134, I mentioned wooden posts erected in the middle of mounds at Aztlan. On page 92 of this link, there is a description of a stone formation several miles west of Aztlan. It also mentions a couple of important petroglyphs found close to the stone.
https://books.google.com/books?id=1...ding stone of missouri hill wisconsin&f=false
Hmm, there may be a fanged guy here and there in S NM.
View attachment 1499925
About your first fanged guy with the eyeglasses - I have the same one in my collection, and I don't play much where you said you got it. Just saying - I bet you have been all over the place over the years. So, if you go looking for it in person or your archives, then my suggestion may or may not help.
I love the Aztec-y looking stuff at FP. How 'bout that monkey and parrot one over towards Cruces? Definitely big trade networks.
For the group: regarding geometry: how about trying the Golden Section? Relevant geometry may be "invisible". Key off the ends of your existing points, or go in-between them. Ratio is 1:1.618. So, can treat distance M (see what I did there - topic relevance!) between points A and B as total distance of 2.618. Or, go off the ends. Then, make new circles. Look for missing points in your geometry and then drop flags.
Sounds exhausting....
sdc, it may be interesting to apply to your big geometry project if it's an interesting enough new angle.
Regarding owls: I never seem to run across them (symbolically) myself. Maybe that's why I'm still just an enthusiast.
Thanks for the link, dog. There is so much good stuff in the upper midwest and the entire Mississippi Valley that it makes your head spin. The artifacts, intaglios, and mostly disappeared structures and trails are not only intriguing, but quite mysterious when you apply the axis mundi directional links ala guys such as Cort Lindahl and others. How's your Tylenol supply?
Who named Cuco?