mikeraydj
Bronze Member
The knob does not do anything when you push it. Seems simple to me.
Enough of this though, I am going detecting. You all have a Merry Christmas!
Bye.
If this was such a non issue do you think it would have gone on this long with such fanfair? There are reasons that are becoming apparent. A. This was a mistake by the company and they do not want the public to know. B. This is a function that they do not want you to access. EX- Being able to make the machine operate out of company specs. Why? You could detune your machine to perform better that it was rolled out to do at the price point, or you could detune the machine and make it so unstable that the service people would have to devote too much time in warranty work from operators adjusting the machine. Am I on the right track Woof? Clearly this is not a non functioning knob or Fisher would have replaced it with a single function knob that is like the rest of the knobs on the machine after the first generation. To say it is non functional and to continue to put a more expensive multi-function knob that does nothing is either a bad business decision, or has a function the company doesn't want the consumer to know about.
The argument, if I told you, what would you do with the information? Is inferring that the competition doesn't know so we should keep this a secret. I propose that if I were a competing detector company, with engineers. I would have your detector in my lab and know exactly the software you use and the hardware in support of it. So the argument of trade secret kinda falls flat.
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited: