Oroblanco
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2005
- Messages
- 7,841
- Reaction score
- 9,871
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- DAKOTA TERRITORY
- Detector(s) used
- Tesoro Lobo Supertraq, (95%) Garrett Scorpion (5%)
Let's try this again since we are both well rested now.
Have you ever found physical proof of Mexican mining in the SWA prior to 1847/8?
A simple yes or no would work.
But if you are felling generous, perhaps you can expand on your discovery for the OTHER TNet members.
Establishing a Mexican presence in the SWA seems to me the very foundation of the argument for any lost mine.
One example that I offer is the El GATO inscriptions. The authentic ones anyway.
Well not to pick a bone with you on this point or to speak for AzDave35, but I have to disagree (respectfully) on the point about a requirement that we must have a record or tradition (at least) of Mexican or Spanish (or by the padres) in the Superstitions as a foundation for any lost mine located in them.
To illustrate my point, the Dr Thorne story has no such foundation, and was not even a "mine" per se just a rich gold deposit that was known to the Indians; that alternate version of the Lost Dutchman, which I will call the Pioneer Interviews version for lack of a better name, also has no Mexican, Spanish or padre element involved. Then too, the lost Wagoner or Waggoner mine, was discovered not as a mine but as an outcropping of rose quartz with gold, no evidence or mention of any previous Mexican, Spanish or padre involvement - nor for that matter any Indian involvement. The interesting rich gold float found by a man named Jenkins in the Superstitions was likewise not from any ancient Spanish or Mexican mine. I realize that for most readers, it is far more romantic to picture the Mexican and Spanish miners working and fighting in the wilderness, using weapons hardly any superior to the bows and arrows in use by their enemies, wild massacres and pack trains loaded full of gold and silver etc. However the later Anglo miners were much more energetic in their searching for gold and for at least some of these lost mines we have no link to any Spanish or Mexican involvement at all.
I will go out on a limb here and state that I believe that pretty much ALL of the Mexican, Spanish, Franciscan or Jesuit activities IN the Superstitions were focused on SILVER not gold. I do not count the Peralta brothers incident as they were stated to be NEAR not in the mountains, and the evidence found in the Goldfield mines is also considered by most to be outside of the Superstition mountains proper. That said, there is some evidence pointing to some Mexican mining interest (if not activity) for gold very close to the Salt river and inside the Wilderness Area, but this remains unproven.
Treasure hunters and researchers have been hunting for proof of Mexican or Spanish mining in the Superstitions for a long time now with little to show for the effort, perhaps it might be more productive to focus on the Anglo period.
Please do continue, did not mean to derail the topic.
Oroblanco