Where did Bicknell get his information for the story? Bicknell was a newspaper writer and storyteller - that was his job. You don't think perhaps he may have "embellished" a bit? Why would you believe Bicknell's story but not the Holme's story other than the fact it fits with your theories?
Hello Cubfan,
I didn’t see you post till just now. I started out with Bicknell’s article. It was enough to study topo maps and come up with as many spots (small areas) possible (for me anyway) that following those clues would get to and be fitting clues. I found 3 places of interest.
Was able to scratch off 2 of them before moved out of state. Life had gotten busy.
Much later, came upon the Holmes Manuscript narrative for getting to the ravine.
By that time, my back was bad enough, I went from electrician to estimator. I much preferred field work to office work, but life is life.
So, lunchtime on a computer .... what to catch up on. Then saw manuscript stuff.
Once again studied the path and topo maps together.
Had to make assumptions for 1st , and second water, but after that, goes to same place as Bicknell’s did.
I planned a trip and went in. Was able to verify an important clue.
Again life got busy. Now here we are.
It was just the colorful parts of the death bed parts that I wondered about.
I hope that answered your questions
I apriciate the direct questions. Did Bicknell embellish? IDK, I followed clues.