bigscoop
Gold Member
- Jun 4, 2010
- 13,535
- 9,072
- Detector(s) used
- Older blue Excal with full mods, Equinox 800.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
And so with LaFitte's memoirs,a Bonaparte involvement,Girard and Patterson,Lallemand,and now Cochrane has been added to the tale-what do you accept as evidence and proof? Where is the provenance that connects these people to the Beale story and treasure?
The "foolish debates" continue because you offer slim evidence and proof on a French/Bonaparte,and now a Greek connection in Lynchburg,but lack the provenance to support such claims.,which serve no purpose towards the progress of establishing the truth.Present something solid,please.
Find your provenance. We'll continue to pursue finding ours. And I've already told you what I'll accept as conclusive proof many times. You consider it slim evidence and I'm fine with that, already fully aware that it's going to take the conclusive proof being sought, and I'm expecting/accepting of nothing else. But at least we're moving forward and still looking for that conclusive proof instead of simply resting on an established theory/possibility that we can't yet conclusively prove. If you don't wish to entertain the possibilities presented then don't. I know I wouldn't if I was so certain they posed no possible connection and I was 100% certain of the dime novel conclusion.