Springfield
Silver Member
gollum said:Lamar, Joe, or anyone else,
Jose has brought up my ABSOLUTE MAIN argument for my belief in Jesuit Mining! WHY was a secret simultaneous arrest warrant necessary for a simple expulsion? This is a point I have argued for many years, and have not gotten a good answer as of yet.
1. They were not being Killed (no need to secrecy)
2. They were not being tortured (no need for secrecy)
3. They were simply being sent back to Europe. Why the secrecy? The only sane reason I can imagine is that Charles III wanted to catch them "with their pants down" (before they had a chance to do something). What something would that be? Before they had a chance to hide their mining activity.
Best-Mike
Things are seldom as they seem, especially regarding 'historical' events. Whether 500 years ago or 5 days ago, those who control the media (hand-written documentation in the days of yore, TV news today) establish the 'facts' that the world accepts as 'truth'. Simple conditioning.
The recent SJ apologists (eg Polzer, Lamar, et al), as archivists, are good soldiers, offering logical, dogmatic 'fact'-based arguements that there was no mining in the New World attributed to the brothers. Those who believe otherwise base their point of view on a substantial amount of anecdotal and circumstantial evidence. Lamar is correct in one respect - no 'smoking gun' (ie irrefutabal proof) has been produced to satisfy all. Given the secrecy and unsurpassed brilliance of the SJ operatives of the time, it's questionable that such evidence will be recovered. Therefore, this arguement will continue in a similar direction - circular.