ivan salis
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2007
- 16,794
- 3,810
- 🏆 Honorable Mentions:
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- delta 4000 / ace 250 - used BH and many others too
- Thread starter
- #41
Re: the state of floridas " catch 22" why they HAD to change their salvage process
if the dive shop had german remains from a WW2 (sub) vessel they sould have been charged with disturbing a war grave -- all military vessels are covered by this international law --no looting or removing items from warships * ---I myself think its ghoulish to remove human remains for public "display" items -- man made items yes --bodies no let them rest in peace where they are -- removing items of worth or use from a wreck is one thing --(the dead no longer can use or have need of them -- however we the living do )-- but there is no need to haul the dead from their place of rest . (ps this "rule*" is already "on the books" so why redo it again?)
I'm just worried about the rule being "twisted" or abused to deny permits at will.
if the dive shop had german remains from a WW2 (sub) vessel they sould have been charged with disturbing a war grave -- all military vessels are covered by this international law --no looting or removing items from warships * ---I myself think its ghoulish to remove human remains for public "display" items -- man made items yes --bodies no let them rest in peace where they are -- removing items of worth or use from a wreck is one thing --(the dead no longer can use or have need of them -- however we the living do )-- but there is no need to haul the dead from their place of rest . (ps this "rule*" is already "on the books" so why redo it again?)
I'm just worried about the rule being "twisted" or abused to deny permits at will.