The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

OOPS EE, you are mistaken again that it's #'s 5, 16, and especially # 38.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Cry Of The Eagle: History And Legends Of The Cherokee Indians And Their Buried Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

OOPS EE, you are mistaken again that it's #'s 5, 16, and especially # 38.

Don Jose de La Mancha

There is no #38.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Since you don't know how to use the quote button, I have no idea which post you are referring to.

Now you understand..Nothing to twist and spin..Art
Please do not make any more claims until you have proved at least one of the 100 or so…Art

 

[EddieR]

ER---

The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?


So far, only one person has answered these questions, and in what I consider to be a logical manner, as follows:

1. I would take Carl's test if he were here. I also might fail it, as my hunts in the past were not always successful. Since I didn't have a 100% success rate in the field, I shouldn't expect more during a test.

2. In my opinion, I think Carl's test is properly set up.

3. In my opinion, I think Carl's test is fair.

Eddie, I commend you for your straightforward and honest answers!




Now, as for your request for my answer, I think you are referring to these posts---

It seems that for proof, the LRL promoters tell us about all their successful hunts, and give the "testimonials" of "other people," and then say, "trust us to be telling you the truth."

As far as LRL'ers saying "trust us to be telling you the truth"....please quote that post, as i do not recall EVER seeing one that said that. Or perhaps.....you are just making things up? If not, I apologize.....just post that quote for me.

I don't see what your problem is with my statement. LRL promoters are always saying that their success is the proof. Therefore, by trying to use their "word" as proof, they are asking us to trust them.

Maybe I should rephrase it, for the nit-pickers, like this---

...and then say, essentially, "trust us to be telling you the truth."

However you phrase it, it still means that the LRL promoters don't want to actually prove to anyone else that their devices really work, but instead, want us to just take their word for it. And that's asking us to trust them about it.

Do you want to nit-pick that apart further?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Sure, I'll nit-pick it.

Here is the whole deal, spelled out very simply so even you can understand it (if you still have trouble there are people on here that will help you, I'm sure). LRL users (the users I am referring to are the ones that I have personally communicated with on this forum) Do not care to prove to you if their device works for them. They just want to be left alone to trade ideas and field techniques among themselves, but you pseudo-skeptics come bumbling out from under your bridges from time to time just to start arguments.

If the LRL'ers on here were really out to fleece people of their money (as the pseudo-skeptics claim), I think it's very odd that I've been on here for quite a while, have expressed my interest in the whole LRL phenomenon, but have yet to be contacted by anyone trying to sell me a LRL.

Actually, it's odd in the sense that you and others have made claims that there are people here on the forum that are on the payroll of LRL companies. How about some proof of your claims? You are always blubbering around wanting proof....try providing some of your own and maybe someone will take you seriously (doubtful, but it's worth a shot).

You claim to be knowledgeable in electronics......prove it.

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

Since you don't know how to use the quote button, I have no idea which post you are referring to.

Now you understand..Nothing to twist and spin..Art
Please do not make any more claims until you have proved at least one of the 100 or so…Art

I've never made any claims.

I have made challenges to your claims, though.

That you can't tell the difference, is an indication of why you promote LRLs.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Sure, I'll nit-pick it.

Here is the whole deal, spelled out very simply so even you can understand it (if you still have trouble there are people on here that will help you, I'm sure). LRL users (the users I am referring to are the ones that I have personally communicated with on this forum) Do not care to prove to you if their device works for them. They just want to be left alone to trade ideas and field techniques among themselves, but you pseudo-skeptics come bumbling out from under your bridges from time to time just to start arguments.

If the LRL'ers on here were really out to fleece people of their money (as the pseudo-skeptics claim), I think it's very odd that I've been on here for quite a while, have expressed my interest in the whole LRL phenomenon, but have yet to be contacted by anyone trying to sell me a LRL.

Actually, it's odd in the sense that you and others have made claims that there are people here on the forum that are on the payroll of LRL companies. How about some proof of your claims? You are always blubbering around wanting proof....try providing some of your own and maybe someone will take you seriously (doubtful, but it's worth a shot).

You claim to be knowledgeable in electronics......prove it.

ER---

First of all, do you really think it's necessary to quote half a page just to say something? Cheeeeeesh!

Secondly, you didn't need to quote anything, because your post doesn't even apply to those others!

Double Cheeeeeeesh!


I, however will make this short and sweet.















#38 & #26.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EddieR]

Sure, I'll nit-pick it.

Here is the whole deal, spelled out very simply so even you can understand it (if you still have trouble there are people on here that will help you, I'm sure). LRL users (the users I am referring to are the ones that I have personally communicated with on this forum) Do not care to prove to you if their device works for them. They just want to be left alone to trade ideas and field techniques among themselves, but you pseudo-skeptics come bumbling out from under your bridges from time to time just to start arguments.

If the LRL'ers on here were really out to fleece people of their money (as the pseudo-skeptics claim), I think it's very odd that I've been on here for quite a while, have expressed my interest in the whole LRL phenomenon, but have yet to be contacted by anyone trying to sell me a LRL.

Actually, it's odd in the sense that you and others have made claims that there are people here on the forum that are on the payroll of LRL companies. How about some proof of your claims? You are always blubbering around wanting proof....try providing some of your own and maybe someone will take you seriously (doubtful, but it's worth a shot).

You claim to be knowledgeable in electronics......prove it.

ER---

First of all, do you really think it's necessary to quote half a page just to say something? Cheeeeeesh!

Secondly, you didn't need to quote anything, because your post doesn't even apply to those others!

Double Cheeeeeeesh!


I, however will make this short and sweet.















#38 & #26.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Yep, those apply to pseudoskeptics perfectly. You nailed one for once.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Very good EddieR..I try to help everyone. I try to answer all questions..But it is not my problem when my answers are not expectable to them…We know that you have only used the device that was given to you one time..Having found the gold ring that you lost has peaked your interest in these devices..That simple fact has caused you to be the target of these so called experts..All their excuses as to why the LRL did not find the ring have been nothing but pure B/S…
I live 45 minutes from Reno which is a popular vacation spot. I have given many demonstrations to people who have visited Reno..I do not give them to people who’s motives are suspect to me. The gentleman who has requested a Demo this weekend and I are try to work into my schedule. ..Art

 

[EE THr]

Very good EddieR..I try to help everyone. I try to answer all questions..But it is not my problem when my answers are not expectable to them…We know that you have only used the device that was given to you one time..Having found the gold ring that you lost has peaked your interest in these devices..That simple fact has caused you to be the target of these so called experts..All their excuses as to why the LRL did not find the ring have been nothing but pure B/S…
I live 45 minutes from Reno which is a popular vacation spot. I have given many demonstrations to people who have visited Reno..I do not give them to people who’s motives are suspect to me. The gentleman who has requested a Demo this weekend and I are try to work into my schedule. ..Art

The topic is not about those questions, or your favorite vacation spot.

Stick to the topic, or start your own thread about something else.

Answer the topic questions.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

I'll try to get it back on topic yet again---

The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?


I'm asking for solid answers, please. No fairyland mumbo-jumbo. We all know the difference.


(Only one person has answered in a sensible way so far.)






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

I've never made any claims.
I have made challenges to your claims, though.
That you can't tell the difference, is an indication of why you promote LRLs.

ER---

First of all, do you really think it's necessary to quote half a page just to say something? Cheeeeeesh!
Secondly, you didn't need to quote anything, because your post doesn't even apply to those others!
Double Cheeeeeeesh!
I, however will make this short and sweet.
#38 & #26

~EddieR~

Yep, those apply to pseudo skeptics perfectly. You nailed one for once.

Good call EddieR

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

I've never made any claims.
I have made challenges to your claims, though.
That you can't tell the difference, is an indication of why you promote LRLs.

ER---

First of all, do you really think it's necessary to quote half a page just to say something? Cheeeeeesh!
Secondly, you didn't need to quote anything, because your post doesn't even apply to those others!
Double Cheeeeeeesh!
I, however will make this short and sweet.
#38 & #26

~EddieR~

Yep, those apply to pseudo skeptics perfectly. You nailed one for once.

Good call EddieR

#22, just as predicted.

And not one real answer to the question, after I reposted it, above....





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?

It is a common psychological problem in that insecure people tend to project their personal deficiencies unto another in self defense, they are sure trying to pass theirs lack of knowledge over to you

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI EE mi buddy, I posted --> regarding suggestions and rules of debating that # 38 was applicable.
****************
you posted --> 'there is no #38, the right after posted -->I, however will make this short and sweet.
#38 & #26

Hmmm ? err ah hmmmm

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EddieR]

LRL users (the users I am referring to are the ones that I have personally communicated with on this forum) Do not care to prove to you if their device works for them. They just want to be left alone to trade ideas and field techniques among themselves, but you pseudo-skeptics come bumbling out from under your bridges from time to time just to start arguments.

Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?

If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.

Hello? Anybody in there?

I know, I know.....your idea of a discussion is an argument. Well, have fun with that.


Geez....some people.....

 

[EE THr]

HI EE mi buddy, I posted --> regarding suggestions and rules of debating that # 38 was applicable.
****************
you posted --> 'there is no #38, the right after posted -->I, however will make this short and sweet.
#38 & #26

Hmmm ? err ah hmmmm

Don Jose de La Mancha

You're gonna love this one....














It's a "living document."

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?
If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

~EddieR~

So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.

Dog Pile!

 

[EE THr]

~SWR~

Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?
If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

~EddieR~

So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.

Dog Pile!

How is merely repeating an announcement by the site owner, supposedly constitute a member saying what is allowed?


What a big #39 that is!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EddieR]

~SWR~

Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?
If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

~EddieR~

So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.

Dog Pile!

How is merely repeating an announcement by the site owner, supposedly constitute a member saying what is allowed?


What a big #39 that is!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Are you really that dense, or do just work hard at it? Your reading comprehension is terrible, EEL.

What a big (pile of) #2 that is!!!!

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE`

How is merely repeating an announcement by the site owner, supposedly constitute a member saying what is allowed?

Yes I did..Was it that hard to understand what the boss said ?