The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer

Status
Not open for further replies.
EddieR said:
EE THr said:
aarthrj3811 said:
~SWR~
Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?
If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

~EddieR~
So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.
Dog Pile!



How is merely repeating an announcement by the site owner, supposedly constitute a member saying what is allowed?


What a big #39 that is!



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Are you really that dense, or do just work hard at it? Your reading comprehension is terrible, EEL.

What a big (pile of) #2 that is!!!!



#22 at it's finest!

So much so, that you have advanced to #34. Congratulations!

"Comment about the above list: Even though this list has been up for awhile, the LRL promoters continue to perform according to these Predictions! Apparently they don't care about being exposed by the scientifically accepted Proof of Prediction standard. They just can't stop themselves! Very interesting. But also very sad."

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Psycho Babble
Psychobabble (a portmanteau of "psychology" or "psychoanalysis" and "babble") is a form of prose using jargon, buzzwords and highly esoteric language to give an impression of plausibility through mystification, misdirection, and obfuscation. The term implies that the speaker of psychobabble lacks the experience and understanding necessary for proper use of a given psychological term. Frequent usage can associate a clinical word with less meaningful buzzword definitions. Some psychological buzzwords have come into widespread use in business management training, motivational seminars, self-help, folk psychology, and popular psychology. Laypersons may overuse such words in describing life problems as clinical maladies when such nomenclature is not valuable, meaningful or appropriate. Theodore Dalrymple defines the term as "the means by which people talk about themselves without revealing anything".[1]
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Psycho Babble
Psychobabble (a portmanteau of "psychology" or "psychoanalysis" and "babble") is a form of prose using jargon, buzzwords and highly esoteric language to give an impression of plausibility through mystification, misdirection, and obfuscation. The term implies that the speaker of psychobabble lacks the experience and understanding necessary for proper use of a given psychological term. Frequent usage can associate a clinical word with less meaningful buzzword definitions. Some psychological buzzwords have come into widespread use in business management training, motivational seminars, self-help, folk psychology, and popular psychology. Laypersons may overuse such words in describing life problems as clinical maladies when such nomenclature is not valuable, meaningful or appropriate. Theodore Dalrymple defines the term as "the means by which people talk about themselves without revealing anything".[1]


Science: (from the Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is an enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the world.


:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

EE THr said:
EddieR said:
EE THr said:
aarthrj3811 said:
~SWR~
Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?
If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

~EddieR~
So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.
Dog Pile!



How is merely repeating an announcement by the site owner, supposedly constitute a member saying what is allowed?


What a big #39 that is!



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Are you really that dense, or do just work hard at it? Your reading comprehension is terrible, EEL.

What a big (pile of) #2 that is!!!!



#22 at it's finest!

So much so, that you have advanced to #34. Congratulations!

"Comment about the above list: Even though this list has been up for awhile, the LRL promoters continue to perform according to these Predictions! Apparently they don't care about being exposed by the scientifically accepted Proof of Prediction standard. They just can't stop themselves! Very interesting. But also very sad."

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

And there is another #2 with a dribble of #1 thrown in for good measure.

:laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9:
 

EddieR said:
EE THr said:
EddieR said:
EE THr said:
aarthrj3811 said:
~SWR~
Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?
If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

~EddieR~
So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.
Dog Pile!



How is merely repeating an announcement by the site owner, supposedly constitute a member saying what is allowed?


What a big #39 that is!



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Are you really that dense, or do just work hard at it? Your reading comprehension is terrible, EEL.

What a big (pile of) #2 that is!!!!



#22 at it's finest!

So much so, that you have advanced to #34. Congratulations!

"Comment about the above list: Even though this list has been up for awhile, the LRL promoters continue to perform according to these Predictions! Apparently they don't care about being exposed by the scientifically accepted Proof of Prediction standard. They just can't stop themselves! Very interesting. But also very sad."

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

And there is another #2 with a dribble of #1 thrown in for good measure.

:laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9:


Uh-oh! Alert! Alert! There's a 6 year old at the keyboard again!

Now you're going to have to wash the graham crackers and milk off the keys.



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

EE THr said:
EddieR said:
EE THr said:
EddieR said:
EE THr said:
aarthrj3811 said:
~SWR~
Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?
If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

~EddieR~
So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.
Dog Pile!



How is merely repeating an announcement by the site owner, supposedly constitute a member saying what is allowed?


What a big #39 that is!



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Are you really that dense, or do just work hard at it? Your reading comprehension is terrible, EEL.

What a big (pile of) #2 that is!!!!



#22 at it's finest!

So much so, that you have advanced to #34. Congratulations!

"Comment about the above list: Even though this list has been up for awhile, the LRL promoters continue to perform according to these Predictions! Apparently they don't care about being exposed by the scientifically accepted Proof of Prediction standard. They just can't stop themselves! Very interesting. But also very sad."

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

And there is another #2 with a dribble of #1 thrown in for good measure.

:laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9:


Uh-oh! Alert! Alert! There's a 6 year old at the keyboard again!

Now you're going to have to wash the graham crackers and milk off the keys.



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Sorry...I was just trying to get to a more accessible reading comprehension level. I guess I can go to 5 years. Maybe that will be easier?
 

EddieR said:
EE THr said:
EddieR said:
EE THr said:
EddieR said:
EE THr said:
aarthrj3811 said:
~SWR~
Well....here is yer problem Lil' Buckaroo......this forum is for the discussion of said devices. Not for LRL users to trade ideas and field techniques amongst themselves. Where did you come up with that lame idea?
If you are looking for a pro-chat only message board....you've come to the wrong address

~EddieR~
So now YOU are saying what can and can't be posted here?

I know you guys don't have a grip on reality and all....but.....I hate to break this to ya.....trading ideas and techniques IS discussing LRL's.
Dog Pile!



How is merely repeating an announcement by the site owner, supposedly constitute a member saying what is allowed?


What a big #39 that is!



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Are you really that dense, or do just work hard at it? Your reading comprehension is terrible, EEL.

What a big (pile of) #2 that is!!!!



#22 at it's finest!

So much so, that you have advanced to #34. Congratulations!

"Comment about the above list: Even though this list has been up for awhile, the LRL promoters continue to perform according to these Predictions! Apparently they don't care about being exposed by the scientifically accepted Proof of Prediction standard. They just can't stop themselves! Very interesting. But also very sad."

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

And there is another #2 with a dribble of #1 thrown in for good measure.

:laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9: :laughing9:


Uh-oh! Alert! Alert! There's a 6 year old at the keyboard again!

Now you're going to have to wash the graham crackers and milk off the keys.



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Sorry...I was just trying to get to a more accessible reading comprehension level. I guess I can go to 5 years. Maybe that will be easier?


Yeah, maybe a 5 year old is above your doo-doo and wee-wee talk level.

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

And little missy, what's wrong with that??? Did you not recognize the greatness of the one that does not even leave a shadow?

Faster than a speeding LRL, able to leap tall mfds in a single bound. The man of Transference flies again.


Sorry it was too obvious, the delusion must be applauded. :blob8:
 

fenixdigger said:
And little missy, what's wrong with that??? Did you not recognize the greatness of the one that does not even leave a shadow?

Faster than a speeding LRL, able to leap tall mfds in a single bound. The man of Transference flies again.


Sorry it was too obvious, the delusion must be applauded. :blob8:

;D :hello2: :hello2: :hello2:
 

EE?? you posted -->Now you're going to have to wash the graham crackers and milk off the keys.
*************
why? The cockroaches & ants in my key board do that daily, sides milk and the crackers are goood.

I also have a lil jumping spider that just loves to chase the curser over the screen every so often.

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

You know Eddie, it looks like between us, we have at least 2 dozen devices. Then I looked at the whiz kids. I just don't see how we can compete with that kind of experience. Oh wait, they had 0 listed.

I'd like to question the answer before it gets here. How can anybody take them serious?
 

JudyH said:
Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
HI EE mi buddy, :coffee2: :coffee2: I posted --> regarding suggestions and rules of debating that # 38 was applicable.
****************
you posted --> 'there is no #38, the right after posted -->I, however will make this short and sweet.
#38 & #26

Hmmm ???? err ah hmmmm

Don Jose de La Mancha


It's that "Dissonance" thingy we discussed, Tayoper. Reality only applies to others...not to the Great Sentient One. It is how he rationalizes to himself why he shouldn't be held to the same rules. He makes up his own. He even goes so far as to outright lie to enable himself. :wink:



You just weren't paying attention enough.

I split two of the numbered items into separate, additional items, to avoid confusion.

That's what I meant when I joked to RDT, "It's a living document."















P.S. Your irrelevent comment is a fine #39. Thanks for the great example!

"39. Another tactic commonly used by the CA, is to try and get an emotional response, and thus pull the discussion off-topic, by nit-picking. The CA will pick out any small error in your rebuttal, like a typo, or some minor technical detail, or just any little irrelevant thing at all, and try to invalidate you and your entire message for it, as though it somehow contradicts all of what you are saying, and entirely validates everything they have said. This shows that they are being totally illogical, and is a sign of desperation on their part."


Maybe I should add another, about child-like behavior?

I already have one about amateur sick-ologists. I guess I should add eugenics, huh?



:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

fenixdigger said:
You know Eddie, it looks like between us, we have at least 2 dozen devices. Then I looked at the whiz kids. I just don't see how we can compete with that kind of experience. Oh wait, they had 0 listed.

I'd like to question the answer before it gets here. How can anybody take them serious?



Do you also have experience in snipe hunting, and investments with Bernie Madoff, and an uncle named Charles Ponzi?

All that, and experience with LRLs too! And you're proud?

But not proud enough to prove anything!


:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

~EE~
Do you also have experience in snipe hunting
I have never shot one but have saw them flying down the sloughs in California..Very fast birds that would take a lot of skill to bring down..
investments with Bernie Madoff, and an uncle named Charles Ponzi?
No I have not..I keep my money under my mattress

All that, and experience with LRLs too! And you're proud?
Yes I am
But not proud enough to prove anything!
What has pride to do with answering a question?
http://crackerboy.us/2007/02/03/snipe-hunting/
You may have been on a snipe hunt, but you’ve probably never hunted snipe.
There really is such a thing as a snipe, and folks do hunt them—especially masochists. The Jacksnipe, or Common Snipe (Gallinago gallinago) is a bird about the size of a quail. A relative of the woodcock, it likes to hang around in areas where the water table is just below the surface, such as the edges of marshes and throughout wet prairies. This facilitates its feeding, which it does by probing for worms and other small creatures with its long, prehensile bill. Its coloring is what zoologists call “cryptic,” which is to say that it mimics so well the whites, grays and browns of its habitat that it’s damned near invisible.
 

EE:

A) snipe hunting is fun, especially if a beatiful broad is with you. Wanna try it wih Unicorn and Judy?

B) Regarding pore Bernie, many 'did' make a lot of money off of him. Just as many
did / do on uncle Sammy's ponzsie SS scheme.

C) dowsing works also, so why not combine it with an lrl?

Don Jose d eLa Mancha
 

aarthrj3811 said:
~EE~
Do you also have experience in snipe hunting
I have never shot one but have saw them flying down the sloughs in California..Very fast birds that would take a lot of skill to bring down..
investments with Bernie Madoff, and an uncle named Charles Ponzi?
No I have not..I keep my money under my mattress

All that, and experience with LRLs too! And you're proud?
Yes I am
But not proud enough to prove anything!
What has pride to do with answering a question?
http://crackerboy.us/2007/02/03/snipe-hunting/
You may have been on a snipe hunt, but you’ve probably never hunted snipe.
There really is such a thing as a snipe, and folks do hunt them—especially masochists. The Jacksnipe, or Common Snipe (Gallinago gallinago) is a bird about the size of a quail. A relative of the woodcock, it likes to hang around in areas where the water table is just below the surface, such as the edges of marshes and throughout wet prairies. This facilitates its feeding, which it does by probing for worms and other small creatures with its long, prehensile bill. Its coloring is what zoologists call “cryptic,” which is to say that it mimics so well the whites, grays and browns of its habitat that it’s damned near invisible.


Well, artie, you finally win. I really didn't know there was such a thing.


:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
EE:

A) snipe hunting is fun, especially if a beatiful broad is with you. Wanna try it wih Unicorn and Judy?

B) Regarding pore Bernie, many 'did' make a lot of money off of him. Just as many
did / do on uncle Sammy's ponzsie SS scheme.

C) dowsing works also, so why not combine it with an lrl?

Don Jose d eLa Mancha



So long as you advertise it as such, and not claim that it does anything "electronically."
 

EE mi coffee striker: you posted -->So long as you advertise it as such, and not claim that it
does anything "electronically."
********
just what does the term 'electronically' actually mean?

Have you ever heard the term eloptics?

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

No. We don't hunt snipe birds in Florida. The snipe is not a sport bird, nor is it eatable. Only google warriors believe "snipe hunting" is factual
I don’t know that there are any snipes in Florida. Yes they are not sport birds and are not eatable. But they are real birds..So get your facts straight. Don’t treat the Snipe like you do LRL’s..Art
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snipe
A snipe is any of about 25 wading bird species in three genera in the family Scolopacidae. They are characterized by a very long, slender bill and cryptic plumage. The Gallinago snipes have a nearly worldwide distribution, the Lymnocryptes Jack Snipe is restricted to Asia and Europe and the Coenocorypha snipes are found only in the Outlying Islands of New Zealand. The three species of painted snipe are not closely related to the typical snipes, and are placed in their own family, the Rostratulidae.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/snipe
pl. snipe or snipes
a. Any of various long-billed shore birds of the genus Gallinago or Capella, related to the woodcocks and sandpipers, especially the common, widely distributed species G. gallinago or C. gallinago.
b. Any of various similar or related birds.
2. A shot, especially a gunshot, from a concealed place.
intr.v. sniped, snip•ing, snipes
1. To shoot at individuals from a concealed place.
2. To shoot snipe.
3. To make malicious, underhand remarks or attacks.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top