The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

EE you consistently avoid taking 'My' test, why? afraid of the truth? what other conclusions can
I come to? you crow about others not taking a test that you suggest, yet ---?

T A K E M Y T E S T or shut up about others taking a test.

you also posted -->Are you knowledgeable in electronics? Can you give a Theory of Operation run-through on either of the LRL schematics that have been posted by SWR, and explain how they transmit and receive, and which of the components therein perform what functions that contribute to that?

then promptly post -->the schematics that couldn't possibly do anything,

so you are asking her to describe step by step a schematic that you claim will not work, yet in itself, YES, can work, it is only that swr doesn't know enough electronics to post the complete schematic, instead of just an extremely simple, crude, trans / receiving ant. tuning section.


Dion Jose de La Mancha

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Family Maps of Hinds County, Mississippi, Deluxe Edition - Grab it through Amazon!

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Sat, you posted regarding finding a treasure -->I do have a toilet plunger, an old battery charger and a non-working outboard motor

************
yep, if you have the required ancillary equip and abilities to go with it ! he he he he

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

So you just made it up then? Or can you quote the post?

I do not need to know the electronic theory or mechanics of something to use it. However.....experience would be required in order to have any kind of credibility when debating it. At least in the real world, anyway.

I think it's funny that you give out pet names (ladies names)....I guess that is one way to get women involved in your life, eh?

Sorry about the name, I thought you were the cutie on Big J's Facebook page.

Apparently you don't really know how to read, however. If you think I'm going to go back over all the posts just to find something that's obvious to everyone following these threads, you're nuts!

No, experience using something that can't possibly work (my contention actually is that LRLs are no better than dowsing, although I don't vouch for dowsing, either).

Besides, it they did work, someone would have collecte Carl's reward money by now. And don't try to come up with some BS excuse for that, either, because it's just common sense.

And don't try the amateur sick-ology with me, either.


And, most of all---




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I'm not asking for your opinion on what was said. You wrote that LRL users said that about the trust issue. I'm asking who said it. And quit avoiding the question with your own mumbo-jumbo. Although slightly entertaining, it does wear thin. Just answer this question: In what post did a LRL user state "trust us to be telling you the truth." If you cannot tell me what post it was, then you obviously just made that up in an attempt to sway opinion....a rather common trait of pseudoskepticism, although it is usually performed with more finesse. Just admit you made it up and we'll move on.

I'm not discussing LRL's now, since you aren't experienced with them you aren't qualified to debate whether they work or not.

Sorry, I'm not going to jump through your hoops, I don't play that game. Just read any thread any place someone wants to use their word as proof. If you can't find tons of places like that, then you aren't looking. If you have been following these threads the least bit, you should be able to remember the many, many, times.

If you can't, too bad for you.

Go take Carl's test, and quit whining.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

W H A T P I C T U R E S ??

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Sorry, I'm not going to jump through your hoops, I don't play that game. Just read any thread any place someone wants to use their word as proof. If you can't find tons of places like that, then you aren't looking. If you have been following these threads the least bit, you should be able to remember the many, many, times.

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,305970.0.html

 

[EE THr]

I see that once again, the LRL promoters have attempted to avoid the topic, and try to pull the subject away from it, so to avoid the truth.

I'll try to get it back on topic yet again---

The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?


I'm asking for solid answers, please. No fairyland mumbo-jumbo. We all know the difference.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~
Quote
Sorry, I'm not going to jump through your hoops, I don't play that game. Just read any thread any place someone wants to use their word as proof. If you can't find tons of places like that, then you aren't looking. If you have been following these threads the least bit, you should be able to remember the many, many, times.

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,305970.0.html
~EE~

I see that once again, the LRL promoters have attempted to avoid the topic, and try to pull the subject away from it, so to avoid the truth.

 

[EE THr]

artie---

Posting a link to your home made movie is not proof.

Once again, as I predicted, you have attempted to pull the thread off topic, in order to avoid the truth.

The truth is, that you and your LRL cannot pass a real Scientific test.

And, as such, you refuse to logically answer the three simple questions in the original post of this topic.








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

The truth is, that you and your LRL cannot pass a real Scientific test.

First someone has to come up with a real Scientific test..Art

 

[EddieR]

So you just made it up then? Or can you quote the post?

I do not need to know the electronic theory or mechanics of something to use it. However.....experience would be required in order to have any kind of credibility when debating it. At least in the real world, anyway.

I think it's funny that you give out pet names (ladies names)....I guess that is one way to get women involved in your life, eh?

Sorry about the name, I thought you were the cutie on Big J's Facebook page.

Apparently you don't really know how to read, however. If you think I'm going to go back over all the posts just to find something that's obvious to everyone following these threads, you're nuts!

No, experience using something that can't possibly work (my contention actually is that LRLs are no better than dowsing, although I don't vouch for dowsing, either).

Besides, it they did work, someone would have collecte Carl's reward money by now. And don't try to come up with some BS excuse for that, either, because it's just common sense.

And don't try the amateur sick-ology with me, either.


And, most of all---




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I'm not asking for your opinion on what was said. You wrote that LRL users said that about the trust issue. I'm asking who said it. And quit avoiding the question with your own mumbo-jumbo. Although slightly entertaining, it does wear thin. Just answer this question: In what post did a LRL user state "trust us to be telling you the truth." If you cannot tell me what post it was, then you obviously just made that up in an attempt to sway opinion....a rather common trait of pseudoskepticism, although it is usually performed with more finesse. Just admit you made it up and we'll move on.

I'm not discussing LRL's now, since you aren't experienced with them you aren't qualified to debate whether they work or not.

Sorry, I'm not going to jump through your hoops, I don't play that game. Just read any thread any place someone wants to use their word as proof. If you can't find tons of places like that, then you aren't looking. If you have been following these threads the least bit, you should be able to remember the many, many, times.

If you can't, too bad for you.

Go take Carl's test, and quit whining.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

No whining here. I'm just wondering, with your "education" and "knowledge" of LRL's (even though you have never used one), why you feel it necessary to lie about what others have posted.

Also...in reference to the video about psychology you keep promoting....are you in the moon landing hoax crowd too?

 

[EE THr]

The truth is, that you and your LRL cannot pass a real Scientific test.

First someone has to come up with a real Scientific test..Art

That's what the three simple questions are for!

They are in the original post of this topic, and elsewhere in the thread.

So, quit whining, and give me (logical) answers to them.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

ER---

(By the way, you never answered if that is you in Big J's Facebook.)

No whining here. I'm just wondering, with your "education" and "knowledge" of LRL's (even though you have never used one), why you feel it necessary to lie about what others have posted.

Also...in reference to the video about psychology you keep promoting....are you in the moon landing hoax crowd too?

Just more waste of time, off-topic, Troll tactics.


Stick to the topic.

Or go to your own thread.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EddieR]

ER---

(By the way, you never answered if that is you in Big J's Facebook.)

No whining here. I'm just wondering, with your "education" and "knowledge" of LRL's (even though you have never used one), why you feel it necessary to lie about what others have posted.

Also...in reference to the video about psychology you keep promoting....are you in the moon landing hoax crowd too?

Just more waste of time, off-topic, Troll tactics.


Stick to the topic.

Or go to your own thread.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Still avoiding the question, eh? Typical pseudoskeptic tactic....get caught in a LIE and you hope it will go away if you ignore it. Sorry...aint happening. Maybe you should go back to your "electrical engineering"....I'm sure Wal-Mart has a light bulb that needs changing.

Now, before you start squalling about being off topic....take a look at your last post to me. Better read it, based on your past posts you have forgotten what it says. How does me being on Facebook pertain to the topic? There's that pesky goose/gander thing that you guys have SO MUCH TROUBLE trying to figure out.

Now, how about answering my question? Did you make that up or will you post the quote?

 

[EE THr]

There's that pesky goose/gander thing that you guys have SO MUCH TROUBLE trying to figure out.

That's just what I figured, thanks.


Now, get back on topic.



P.S. I already answered your irrelevant question.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

I'll try to get it back on topic yet again---

(But I predict more Trolling, and no logical answers.)




The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?


I'm asking for solid answers, please. No fairyland mumbo-jumbo. We all know the difference.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EddieR]

I'll try to get it back on topic yet again---

(But I predict more Trolling, and no logical answers.)




The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?


I'm asking for solid answers, please. No fairyland mumbo-jumbo. We all know the difference.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

No. you didn't answer it. There's another one.

And I DID answer your 3 questions that you CLAIM LRL'rs REFUSE to answer.

You can call it trolling if you wish, but I call it making a pseudoskeptic accountable for not being truthful.

I think it's funny that you can call people names, but heaven forbid anybody say anything about you.

 

[aarthrj3811]

http://www.urban75.com/Mag/troll.html

 

[EE THr]

ER---

The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?


So far, only one person has answered these questions, and in what I consider to be a logical manner, as follows:

1. I would take Carl's test if he were here. I also might fail it, as my hunts in the past were not always successful. Since I didn't have a 100% success rate in the field, I shouldn't expect more during a test.

2. In my opinion, I think Carl's test is properly set up.

3. In my opinion, I think Carl's test is fair.

Eddie, I commend you for your straightforward and honest answers!




Now, as for your request for my answer, I think you are referring to these posts---

It seems that for proof, the LRL promoters tell us about all their successful hunts, and give the "testimonials" of "other people," and then say, "trust us to be telling you the truth."

As far as LRL'ers saying "trust us to be telling you the truth"....please quote that post, as i do not recall EVER seeing one that said that. Or perhaps.....you are just making things up? If not, I apologize.....just post that quote for me.

I don't see what your problem is with my statement. LRL promoters are always saying that their success is the proof. Therefore, by trying to use their "word" as proof, they are asking us to trust them.

Maybe I should rephrase it, for the nit-pickers, like this---

...and then say, essentially, "trust us to be telling you the truth."

However you phrase it, it still means that the LRL promoters don't want to actually prove to anyone else that their devices really work, but instead, want us to just take their word for it. And that's asking us to trust them about it.

Do you want to nit-pick that apart further?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Wrong again, artie.
Don't make the claim, if you can't take the blame.

Please do not make any more claims until you have proved at least one of the 100 or so…Art

 

[EE THr]

Wrong again, artie.
Don't make the claim, if you can't take the blame.

Please do not make any more claims until you have proved at least one of the 100 or so…Art

artie---

Since you don't know how to use the quote button, I have no idea which post you are referring to.

P.S. That's a #12 and #22 combo. I've seen you do better.








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?