aarthrj3811
Gold Member
~EE~
It appears that they like to switch the topic off of LRLs, and onto dowsing. I think this is because they can duck and dodge around that subject better than electronics. As far as I can tell, they have all admitted that dowsing is unreliable, at best. Then they want anyone who contests the LRLs, to debate whether or not dowsing works.
My opinion of that is, that regardless of whether or not dowsing is considered to "work," it's an easy debate to use to duck and dodge with, because one of it's supposed characteristics is that it "depends on the person." They claim that even good dowsers can have bad days, and they claim that it won't work if there is a "nonbeliever" around. And all those unpredictable variables. This gives them great leeway to dance around.
So, when faced with a logical question about LRLs, they always try to slide the discussion over into dowsing.
Of course, when the LRL advertisements, which don't warn anybody that they are dowsers, are mentioned on here, the promoters immediately swith tactics to insults, thinking that if they can trigger someones emotional response, they can take the discussion way off topic for quite awhile. Their objective is to get the other peoples emotions up, any way they can. This is why they are so willing to post the totally childish, nonsensical remarks, even though it makes them look moronic.
Their purpose is to change the subject, then start promoting LRLs again, by going back to telling of their supposed treasure hunting accomplishments and posting alleged testimonials from "others that they know."
It's just a big, well organized, circular logic scheme.
Why else would they work so hard to keep doing it, time after time, after time?
Surely they find no reward in it, after maybe the first one or two times around that circle?
What in the World would drive somebody to just keep on pounding that malarkey like they try to do?
Furthermore, they know the advertisements are fraudulent, because they have admitted that the LRLs can't locate anything electronically, therefore they are dowsers. That was brought out, into the open, long before I started posting here.
Now, if something is actually true, and it actually helps the "human situation" somehow, then it would be understandable why a few people might be adamant about promoting it. Because ultimately it would help them, their family, their community, and mankind. At least to some degree.
But when something is fraudulent, and the people involved certainly know it, there is absolutely no reason that they will work hard to promote it, other than money. None.
So, therefore, I assume that they are totally "on the payroll."
And looking at things from that viewpoint, it all makes sense. Any other way, it just doesn't, at all.