The Peralta Stones

Tell you what.
The next time you go to your Heart, check this place out and then tell me i can't see much from Google. Ok?

I even show the way to get there.....
 

Attachments

  • mine.jpg
    mine.jpg
    133.4 KB · Views: 939
HOLA Parker: Then it was your sat picture that I rotated and corrected ? Hmm, I know that I am not perfect as my luvin wife and Joe love to point out all too frequently, now cubber is chiming in. snifff

Parker, go to programs --> accessories --> system tools --> character map --> © --> select -->Copy, same for @. it will look like this --> ©@. Put this on any pictures / stories / data that you want or have the right to for future protection.

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

Real de Tayopa said:
HOLA Parker: Then it was your sat picture that I rotated and corrected ? Hmm, I know that I am not perfect as my luvin wife and Joe love to point out all too frequently, now cubber is chiming in. snifff

Parker, go to programs --> accessories --> system tools --> character map --> © --> select -->Copy, same for @. it will look like this --> ©@. Put this on any pictures / stories / data that you want or have the right to for future protection.

Don Jose de La Mancha

Hehe - RDT - no hard feelings ok? I just wanted to make sure we were all talking apples and oranges and not getting things all confused. :thumbsup:
 

Real de Tayopa said:
HOLA Parker: Then it was your sat picture that I rotated and corrected ? Hmm, I know that I am not perfect as my luvin wife and Joe love to point out all too frequently, now cubber is chiming in. snifff

Parker, go to programs --> accessories --> system tools --> character map --> © --> select -->Copy, same for @. it will look like this --> ©@. Put this on any pictures / stories / data that you want or have the right to for future protection.

Don Jose de La Mancha


Its open territory anyone can have at it ...... I just found it odd that some use Google to treasure hunt and never saw the huge heart shaped mountains at the base of four peaks and didnt bother to give it a "dowsing" or a "spirit world" once over from 1000 miles away :icon_scratch: Figured Bowman would have gotten it .........
 

HI Parker: In any event, the corrected photo of the intrusion and it's possible effect on your orig photo is now legally ©@ & exclusively your's.

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

Attachments

  • Intrusion in Heart ©@.jpg
    Intrusion in Heart ©@.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 931
  • Intrusion in Heart ©@.jpg
    Intrusion in Heart ©@.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 912
Hi again, I can't find a trail from the Corral which, incidentally, is one huge one.

Any mines in that area will probably be found in one of the circular (rings) faults. This should narrow down your search radically.

My primary choice for first investigating are both "X"'s.

Don Jose De La Mancha
 

Attachments

  • primary choice for investigating.jpg
    primary choice for investigating.jpg
    38.5 KB · Views: 907
Real de Tayopa said:
Hi again, I can't find a trail from the Corral which, incidentally, is one huge one.

Any mines in that area will probably be found in one of the circular (rings) faults. This should narrow down your search radically.

My primary choice for first investigating are both "X"'s.

Don Jose De La Mancha

Back a few years ago when ask.com had excellent sat views you could really see things very clear, the trail, the corral, mines............
Was 50 times better then Google.
North of there on four peaks is an old Amethyst Mine, guy in scottsdale owns it now.

Thanks for the copyright sir........now everyone stay away from my GOLD, You can tell Im a 'typical' American.

Heres another thing to look at......closed mining claims just west of those mountains!!!!!!!!
 

Sorry Parker, you only own the picture, all are free to act upon it he he he However, if, for some reason, someone would like to incude it in some data, or book, they would have to ask you for permission. Get up Parker, neednt' grovel in slobbery gratitude. he he he

As for that Cubber sniff he posted -->Hehe - RDT - no hard feelings ok?
********
Notice, he is actually giggling about it. sniff Where is my effigy of him? I have found the rusty pins, but----

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

David,

"But the word about the gold and how it was being taken came from the natives in the south, who moved there gold and hid it in the seven cities of gold. Ring a bell?"

Have you been hearing a lot of these ringing bells? :o

Just askin.......

Joe
 

Mike,

I forgot to get back to you after talking to Bob Corbin. The story is not much different than what you have, except it was only one FBI agent and the Stone Maps were not with him.

I don't believe there was any official reason for the FBI to have them, as they were not part of their investigation. I believe the problems for the company were late filing....plain and simple.

Take care,

Joe
 

Many people believe that Adolph Ruth hiked from Willow Spring to the back side of Black Top Mesa, where he died of natural causes. At some point, and animal, likely a javalina, carried the skull down into Needle Canyon puncturing the skull in two places with his tusks, lost interest in his find and left it in the canyon.

The bone structure around the eyes, nose and mouth was not damaged. There were no marks showing that an animal had gnawed on the skull.

I think that's correct. Anyone else believe that theory?

Thanks,

Joe
 

Hola amigos,

I believe Cactusjumper has it correct as to the reason for FBI involvement with MOEL Inc; if the authorities had believed the Peralta stones were 100 years old, they would have had grounds for prosecution under the Antiquities Act. The state termed them "curiosities" and this is a very good descriptive word for them - IN MY OPINION.

cactusjumper said:
Many people believe that Adolph Ruth hiked from Willow Spring to the back side of Black Top Mesa, where he died of natural causes. At some point, and animal, likely a javalina, carried the skull down into Needle Canyon puncturing the skull in two places with his tusks, lost interest in his find and left it in the canyon.

The bone structure around the eyes, nose and mouth was not damaged. There were no marks showing that an animal had gnawed on the skull.

I think that's correct. Anyone else believe that theory?

Thanks,

Joe

Well I for one do NOT believe that at all. When critters get to chewing up bodies (whether human or animal) they leave plenty of evidence of their work; in fact the fragile, thin bone portions of Ruth's skull were intact, which argues against some natural accident causing the obvious holes too. I find it curious that deputy Adams went to the trouble of writing a letter to argue the point about Ruth dying from natural causes too.
Oroblanco

*Finally got a day to spend at home, and it is so windy we can't get a thing done on our building project - sheesh can't get a break! ::) :BangHead: Oh well, this gave me a chance to catch up here and torment our good friends! :thumbsup:
 

I have looked at the pictures and read what reports I could find and I do not believe that an animal did that damage, the fine bones around the nose and eyes seemed undamaged. Actually it seems kind of strange that it was in such good shape. A body lying in the desert in the hot weather is not going to go unnoticed, nothing goes to waste in the desert, it really surprises me that nothing did chew it up or at least leave teeth marks from just nawing and pulling of the skin.

Bill
 

It has been my long held supposition that Ruth was indeed murdered for what he knew.That the perpetrator(s) returned at a later date,concerned that the discovery of the body would lead to a successful search for the mine,in order to move the now decomposing body to a different location.That during the transport,probably with the remains wrapped in a blanket and draped over a horse or mule,the skull became detached from the body due to the state of decay to fall,unnoticed to the ground along the route of travel.It is my thought that the person responsible,probably working alone at this time,may have decided not to backtrack and look for fear of "pushing his luck",and simply cleared out at this time.

Regards:
SH
 

Bill96 said:
I have looked at the pictures and read what reports I could find and I do not believe that an animal did that damage, the fine bones around the nose and eyes seemed undamaged. Actually it seems kind of strange that it was in such good shape. A body lying in the desert in the hot weather is not going to go unnoticed, nothing goes to waste in the desert, it really surprises me that nothing did chew it up or at least leave teeth marks from just nawing and pulling of the skin.

Bill

I can only think of one reason why there were no signs of animal activity on the skull, and it leads to ALOT more questions!
 

And yet, I have friends who are highly intelligent as well as being some of the most knowledgeable Dutch Hunters alive, and they still believe that Ruth's death was natural and the holes in his head were the results of animal depredation. :dontknow:

Joe Ribaudo
 

Hmmm From the poor pictures that I saw, I cannot believe that it was animal caused. What animal in there is big enough to encompass his skull, and only make a single bite ?? To even grasp his skull most would need a few progressive bites before finally finding a solid one, which would show up.

Also, no animal bite shows the structural damage that I saw. Evidence of bone materiel being 'expelled' from the right side of the skull, not being driven into it as a bite would do.

To me it appears as if he was ambushed and shot from above to his left.

Regarding the deputy's explanation of natural causes would cover a lot of mistakes and inability to solve an almost impossible case. Easy way out.

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top