Oroblanco
Gold Member
- Jan 21, 2005
- 7,841
- 9,850
- Detector(s) used
- Tesoro Lobo Supertraq, (95%) Garrett Scorpion (5%)
Quinan Bear said:Oroblanco;
I would hope you got that coffee first of all.
There is just no pleasing you, is there?
I talk about the Peralta stones you ask me how they lead to the LDM?
I talk about the LDM and you ask about the Peralta stones?
I have posted facts on the faults and geology of the Mountains and explained a bit on how they got to be and how they were visible there and You tell me the stone are fake and that my studies have no merit and they won't show anything?
You might want to try herbal tea...your a bit "jumpy"...
Hola amigo,
Please don't go putting words into my mouth? I never said your facts on the geology had no merit. I never said satellite images have no merit. I said that my OPINION is that the stones are a modern fake, but I thought I also made clear that I don't put a lot of faith in ANY treasure map, whether paper, stone, or aethereal dots on a matrix. It seems that you are reading much more into what I said than is there. What is it you want from me?
I am no expert in satellite photos, so for ME they are of very limited use. Great help for finding old roads, foundations etc, but you can be fooled by satellite (and aerial) photos.
I don't believe in the Peralta stones, or any treasure map, so it doesn't much matter to me if someone (including you) should find all kinds of verifiable stone/topographic imagery that mates up with the maps; most all of the treasure maps do match up with geography and sometimes with "treasure signs" - which is great for someone working out the maps/codes, but not the same as finding a gold mine TO ME.
I don't know how else to put this; I don't depend on geologic maps, ALONE; I don't depend on newspaper reports, ALONE; etc etc it takes ore specimens for lode mines, placer gold for placer mines. Diamonds for a diamond mine.
No pleasing me? Show me a piece of gold ore, that an expert in geology can compare with the existing specimens of Waltz's ore, and with the other specimens at the U of A - that is scientific proof.
Cactusjumper hit the nail there too - you have to hunt elephants in the elephants country; even if you see 10,000 from a satellite image, it doesn't prove you got an elephant!
Oroblanco
PS - Quinan Bear, you don't NEED to convince me, the folks you have to convince are your potential partners, and the Forest Service in order to get your permits. No worries, the accolades, fame, TV interviews etc will follow once you have the evidence in hand.