Gentlemen: sheesh I have never seen such easily hurt egos - specifically referring to BB and SF. Cubber , Oro, & Cactus Joe have always remained gentlemanly?? Well, I know that Real de T has, and if you don't believe me, I'll kick the *^*^ out of you !!
They have simply asked questions that would normally be asked around a discussion table. Questions that instead of producing a simple answer, not secret data, seem to only bring out the defensiveness of apparently not 'having' the answers??
I personally do not have even 1 /10 th of what I want, or should have. I most likely never will, but it doesn't embarrass me or make me aggressive to be asked why not? In fact it can bring out questions that I psrsonally may not have considered for one reason or another.
SFNM, I early learned that if you wish someone to read a post or so, you must follow the basic rules, no excessive or irrational punctuation, this only distracts from your intended purpose, and most likely will quickly lose the train of thought. Eventually they simply stop reading the post.
SFNM, I early """learned""" that if you wish someone to **read** a post or so, you """"must"""" follow the ++++basic rules++++, no """"excessive"""" or """"irrational""" punctuation, this only **distracts** from your (((intended purpose))), and most """"'quickly"""" lose the train of thought. ((( Eventually))) they simply stop reading the posts
Framkly SFNM, which is easier to read and understand?
SFNM While I like your posts, they frankly quickly turn me off, just as the above one, did you. Not in context, but in presentation.
So let's clean it up and start with a clean slate, err posts, and actually learn something from each other. Each of us do have something to pass on , and as I have said, that need not include where "X" is.
Don Jose de La Mancha El Sainto