somehiker
Silver Member
- May 1, 2007
- 4,365
- 6,434
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Hi Mike:
I had wondered if wear could have been responsible for the missing section,as was evident with that of the right side of the inscription.
That seemed to be the case when I enlarged published photos of the stones,as with this example.
I had a good look in April,but through the glass,and it did not seem to have suffered as much wear in that area.Perhaps the crossbar was not cut as deep as the rest of the "A" to begin with... ...Did you happen to get a photo with your microscope? I managed to get a very clear closeup in April of similar magnification,and,while it possibly shows a very faint horizontal line,the area in the middle of the A was never carved to the depth of the other lines to begin with.Nor does enough wear seem to have occurred to that area of the inscription.This closeup is angled downward,to better show the amount of wear present.
Any thoughts as to the reduction in the font size of the word "PELIGROZA" on the Priest side?
A close look at the differing style of the "1" and the "8" within the heart cutout may raise a question or two as well.It is obvious,as you have observed, that most,if not all of the carving was done with sharpened iron tools,drawn repeatedly across the stone.Nowhere is this more evident than with the "1847",something that obviously required a greater degree of effort on the part of the carver.The point of the "1" seems misplaced for some reason.Not likely due to error IMO.The "8" looks more like a pair of "circle in circles" as well,which could be the reason for the size and style of the inscription.
Regards:SH.
I had wondered if wear could have been responsible for the missing section,as was evident with that of the right side of the inscription.
That seemed to be the case when I enlarged published photos of the stones,as with this example.
I had a good look in April,but through the glass,and it did not seem to have suffered as much wear in that area.Perhaps the crossbar was not cut as deep as the rest of the "A" to begin with... ...Did you happen to get a photo with your microscope? I managed to get a very clear closeup in April of similar magnification,and,while it possibly shows a very faint horizontal line,the area in the middle of the A was never carved to the depth of the other lines to begin with.Nor does enough wear seem to have occurred to that area of the inscription.This closeup is angled downward,to better show the amount of wear present.
Any thoughts as to the reduction in the font size of the word "PELIGROZA" on the Priest side?
A close look at the differing style of the "1" and the "8" within the heart cutout may raise a question or two as well.It is obvious,as you have observed, that most,if not all of the carving was done with sharpened iron tools,drawn repeatedly across the stone.Nowhere is this more evident than with the "1847",something that obviously required a greater degree of effort on the part of the carver.The point of the "1" seems misplaced for some reason.Not likely due to error IMO.The "8" looks more like a pair of "circle in circles" as well,which could be the reason for the size and style of the inscription.
Regards:SH.