lokiblossom
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2014
- Messages
- 1,865
- Reaction score
- 1,310
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Traverse City, Mi.
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
You finally realized there is a difference between an academic accredited historian and a books author who is credited with creating that work- the first must provide solid documentation in support of the claims presented, the latter can use actual facts to support pure speculation.
PS: Dan Brown is another "well respected author", but not a "credited" historian.
'nuff said.
As an author myself I knew there was a difference, I had simply misused a word.
The three authors I have mentioned are all well respected historians on the Templars, so answer my question. What is it that they have written that you disagree with?
Cheers, Loki