the everything site ...?

Bill96 said:
bb wrote
Quote:"lets talk about the fact is it posable to have a site like this ...


Bill wrote
I can believe just about anything is possible i'm just asking you to prove it or at the very least show some tangable evidence.
Bill

Bill,
that is all any of us ever asked.
All BB wants to do is throw unsupported (supposed) facts out for us to drool over...
And then gets bent because unlike a bunch of newbies to the subject we ask for something to support the (supposed ) facts.

BB
What you need to do is let us decide for ourselves what we can and can't handle.
Some of us have seen things that you (even with your imagination) cannot begin to fathom.
Don't go into that "I can see all things" stuff,... it isn't so
Want to try it... What did I just say? so call me on it.
I'll admit it to the forum.

Otherwise. Put up or shut up.
Enough is enough.
 

Based on the evidence that I have personally seen and base on all the stories that have been written, by very reliable sources. I am completely convinced that a real Santa Clause does indeed exist and lives at the North pole and I can prove it! and yes I have sen him!!
 

Bill96 said:
Based on the evidence that I have personally seen and base on all the stories that have been written, by very reliable sources. I am completely convinced that a real Santa Clause does indeed exist and lives at the North pole and I can prove it! and yes I have sen him!!

what dose your wife think of you seeing santa clause on the side ....? and if your not married becareful santa is known for the one night thing ...lol
 

BB,
Other than my children I would hesitate to tell anyone to "shutup", so please continue.
Bill
 

let me share a little going away present with you . see chanle island , chicomoztoc , tenochititlan,galapagos island ,and nasca had one thing they all share, a sealevel of 1700 or better ...thats how far the water level came up . see chicomoztoc was not always hidden in the mts ...it was on costal shore line ..

so get out your pen and draw the line any place lower then a 1700 ft sea level is at risk ....did the land push up or did the water level rise ...? well if all 5 of those places are at the same sea level ,,whats that tell you ...?

they were trying to warn us ...about what had happend to them ....the great flood was 1700ft high, if it happend once apone a time it can happen again ...and most likely will ...


i dont think i would want to live in phoenix....unless your a real good swimmer ....

so there was a good reason the clovis vanished from the low lands ..because the low lands were under water ...good chance its the same reason the dinosaur vanished ...poor swimmers i guess , how much of the earth is coverd in water ...? have you ever try to swim across the atlantic ocean none stop , think about it ...

good luck
 

HOLA mi amigos,

Cactusjumper wrote:
Hope all is well with you folks.

"Now in this island of Atlantis there was a great and wonderful empire which had rule over the whole island and several others, and over parts of the continent, and, furthermore, the men of Atlantis had subjected the parts of Libya within the columns of Heracles as far as Egypt, and of Europe as far as Tyrrhenia."

Can you pinpoint this time in history?

HI Joe! Yes all is well with us, been very busy of late so haven’t been able to devote so much time to irritating the good folks here on T-net. You ask a valid question – and I wrote up a way-too-long reply so have shortened it up, since it hit me that you must have read Plato as well – the easy answer is 9,500 BC (11,508 years ago for those who don’t want to do the math) which is a very interesting time period. So I must now respectfully disagree with Blindbowman’s date of 1500-1600 BC, on the basis that these dates do not agree with Plato, nor has the sea level changed all that much since then.

Don Jose’, Dueno de Real e Minas de Tayopa wrote:
Relax my friend, I have a hide tempered by life, ORO, CJ , djuicy, old dog, jack and a host of others. I doubt that you can insult me truly, sides I am a narcissistic, egotistical, masochist, in other words a treasure hunter. Snicker

A big ‘cowboy’ HOWDY to you amigo, and I do hope that you have since forgiven my numerous skeptical questions I flooded you with, when I first ran into you and your claims of having discovered the REAL Tayopa. It is just my nature, to need more before I can believe (could be a real problem in being Christian couldn’t it?) though I don’t need to see stacks of gold bars either. I know that Blindbowman thinks that we are giving him a hard time as a special case, but he should have seen the discussion when we first met, eh amigo? I note too that you mentioned being a masochist eh? :o ;D Hmm…. Now that might just give a fellow like ME some ideas! (snicker) ;D :D :wink:

Bill wrote:
Based on the evidence that I have personally seen and base on all the stories that have been written, by very reliable sources. I am completely convinced that a real Santa Clause does indeed exist and lives at the North pole and I can prove it! and yes I have sen him!!

I will go you one better amigo – I met him! It is a long (and humorous) story but somewhere we do have the photos to prove it, too bad I had not been a “good boy” at the time!

Blindbowman from what you say, you do not plan on ever telling us where it is correct? Not even ONE site? I could infer from that, that if someone were to find ONE site, they will almost certainly find all the rest right? By the way, when I mentioned about MINING claims are not allowed, (referring to the lost gold mine of Jacob Waltz) it is still possible (though DIFFICULT) to get a Treasure Trove claim, assuming you have enough documentation and proof to back it up; in such a case, once you have the trove claim you could then remove the treasure(s) and no one else could legally touch it. (Other than the HALF that the Feds would get right off the top, which if you think about it is not too bad a deal for them, since they also get you for Income Tax on the rest!) So depending on exactly what it is that you found, it is possible that you could legally claim it and own it, unless it is a mine.

Good luck and good hunting amigos, I hope you all find the treasures that you seek! (And that when you do, you will invite ME to come and see it and sample your COFFEE!) :coffee2: :thumbsup: :tongue3:
your friend,
Oroblanco
 

the premit is total BS ...thats why this discovery is not public ..yet ...


you bring up a good debate , scott wood controls the premits ,and the premit is total BS ,whats that tell ya ...?


it is not that i dont trust scott wood i dont even know him presonally .. i dont trust anyone at this piont ....


i am ready to just formatt the hard drive and sell the computer .......

i have a copy of ever email between scott wood and my self on record . no one will be able to make a clam at site 1 and no one will ever know where site 4 is .. good luck to you all .. i hope this never happends to any of you ...


stay safe stay free


PS if plato wrote about atlantis being 9000 years old when he was writeing about it he was writeing about it some time around 428-347 B.C

that makes it at lest 9400 bc or older we may asume the culture was at its peak between 1600 -9000 years ago and plato dosent say when atlantis sank into the sea dose he ...as far as i know he only stated atlantis was more then 9000 years old
 

the blindbowman said:
...i dont think i would want to live in phoenix....unless your a real good swimmer ....

I don't know ... the Scallion map and others predict that Phoenix will be a Pacific Ocean city some day. Might give a boost to real estate prices.
 

Attachments

  • scallion.jpg
    scallion.jpg
    61.2 KB · Views: 309
Hi Springfield

If the San Andreas ever pulls a biggy they could be right,
and if one of the Canary isles does some slippin and sliding as predicted i wouldn't want to be owning real estate on the east coast either,

js
 

i have to wait an see how you react to me finding tayopa 1 ..lol

note ,who was it that said i should know what should be at the mouth of the cave ...? dont all tribes have a totem ...this one dose ....lol ...

this discovery is not going to be disproven ...i have it in writeing ...

you may be right RDT . the totem say the site is chicomoztoc ...lol
 

i have a copy of ever email between scott wood and my self on record . no one will be able to make a clam at site 1 and no one will ever know where site 4 is

BB - cmon, you talk about logic all the time - use yours here.

Despite having every e-mail you and Scott have shared, you're at a stalemate right? He's not going to issue you a permit unless you provide evidence (especially including the sites location for he or his representatives to see for themselves), and you're not going to provide him with the site location unless he gives you a permit (or at least something else legally binding) - my guess is neither of these things are going to ever happen.

With that being the case, ANYONE else could come across the same sites you have claimed to find and apply for a permit. If they're willing to provide the necessary information to Scott's department and everything falls into place, there's absolutely nothing you can do to prevent them from claiming it.

It would be no different from you wanting purchase a piece of property. If you're not willing to provide information regarding the property (where it is, how much it's worth, etc...) you want to purchase, you won't get people to agree to all the paperwork necessary to actually purchase it. Just because someone comes along later and DOES follow all the requirements and buys it doesn't mean you have any legal recourse just because you have documentation saying you were interested in it.
 

bb,

"the premit is total BS ...thats why this discovery is not public ..yet ..."

I think that pretty well sums up all of your posts, (that's what it tells me) but it's good to have you confirming it.
______________________________________________________________________

[you bring up a good debate , scott wood controls the premits ,and the premit is total BS ,whats that tell ya ...?


it is not that i dont trust scott wood i dont even know him presonally .. i dont trust anyone at this piont ....


i am ready to just formatt the hard drive and sell the computer .......

i have a copy of ever email between scott wood and my self on record . no one will be able to make a clam at site 1 and no one will ever know where site 4 is .. good luck to you all .. i hope this never happends to any of you ...]

There is another source for the permits. I don't want to be the one to subject them to your "clams", so I will keep the information to myself.

At one time you told us you had three computers running 24/7 in your research. Are you now saying the other two burned themselves out?

Who you trust is not the issue. The issue is: Who in the world trusts you?

Having said that, I really wonder what we will all do if you actually leave this time........for good.

I believe our loss will be Yahooka's gain.

Joe Ribaudo
 

You boys are at it again... hmmm..
Wow, went in to find my emails on RVing and they're gone. Damn, that was a lot of work.
So BB the Speres? You are cutting and pasting again... shame shame...lol.
The reason you find connections between and betwixt is because all of it is intertwined, beautifully IMO, but isn't the Phythagorian theory been proved wrong? I thought I read that somewhere, I'll get back to you.
Oro, thank you so much for your message, I appreciated it. I had so much down time this summer, I had a ball noshing with you all.
So I will try to catch up with this posts!
Yikes, I have to download this before it all gets away, with BB nasty little habit of delete.
Janiece :bunny:
 

Gossamer said:
You boys are at it again... hmmm..
Wow, went in to find my emails on RVing and they're gone. Damn, that was a lot of work.
So BB the Speres? You are cutting and pasting again... shame shame...lol.
The reason you find connections between and betwixt is because all of it is intertwined, beautifully IMO, but isn't the Phythagorian theory been proved wrong? I thought I read that somewhere, I'll get back to you.
Oro, thank you so much for your message, I appreciated it. I had so much down time this summer, I had a ball noshing with you all.
So I will try to catch up with this posts!
Yikes, I have to download this before it all gets away, with BB nasty little habit of delete.
Janiece :bunny:

no in fact it was Albert Einstein that dismist the 5th element of the Phythagorian theory for his own magnetic theory like that was a smart move ..lol wrong . if he had a better under standing of the 5th element he would have come up with the define sound /light cohesion WPD thoery .. ad it would have been correct then ,....

so welcome back to are little trool party .. their all mad because i found a totem and didnt tell them and now they know damn well their days are numberd ...so i will milk it for a few more laughs then make them look like fools .. ya that pretty much covers it ....lol
 

hay cj what happends if i am correct ..and your wrong ...? lol what then .. how long have you been researching the supers a week and a 1/2...lol

your a very smart man cj i dont know why you havent figerd out the game yet ...its find the target as fast as you can then have fun with the people that have spend their life searching ...your it .....


Cj you mad a few very bad misteas . one was ruleing out other possablities ,for a evidence that was not fact .. even if you beleived it would become fact , it didnt mean it would ...

opioion vs solid evidence ..

i dont under stand why i havent seen your plaque with your name on it out there . why didnt worst ask you to join him on stage if you had almost as much time searching the supers as he did .. i dont think it would have made any diffrence what so ever how many years you searched . you ether got it or you dont ...


willow springs has a nice eastern gorge dosent it ...lol ..

enough of this how would you ;like to help me move a totem pole.. it weight about 700 lbs ...i could only guess its weight , so we need some horse or mules ... and scott woods to say yup thats a totem pole ...lol
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top