the everything site ...?

Furness said:
This is my first post, i had intended it being much longer, but i can't find anywhere to intro myself,

and Oro has already answered BB on most of them,

all i will add at this point is that BB's claim that he has discovered the fifth element is about two years to late,
it was discovered and is being worked on at the present time in The US and probably by now in other countries by any number of mathematicians and physicists,

with regards his pattern to prime numbers this was discovered with a couple of years of primes and is only applicable at the lower levels of primes, once you get past i think its the 1,262nd prime the pattern disappears, it is followed further up the number sequence as other patterns emerge, but as with the first one then disappear's and is only applicable to a short sequence of numbers,
there is no overall pattern that can be used to work them out,

primes are as stated in any maths book an integer that cannot be divided into other integers except by itself or 1
primes are nothing more than a series of numbers and have no bearing on any atomic freqency or action, and as far as is known not related to any action at any level except in there own right as a mathematical oddity, the only use to which they have so far been used is for secure data encryption,

J's
name your sorces ... think again, i took these binary worms to the 186 292 to the speed of light .. i have no idea what your talking about and i dont beleive you do ...lol sorry newbe the even primes do the same thing with the number 2 .. if you dont under stand what this is about just say so ...i am in contact with over 20 people that are trying to work with this discovery and no it has never been found before aug 4th if what you were saying was true the multiables of the prime would go so far and end ,, thats impossble with the patterns i found ...i like this site but every time ,nothing but trolls

"primes are as stated in any maths book an integer that cannot be divided into other integers except by itself or 1 "
no shit dick tracy , we are talking about the spaces between the prime numbers ...wow ..i am sick of the trolls and people that dont have a clue you come here and you reply you dont even under stand what the discovery is and you voiceing your negitive opioions about something you dont even under stand .

.. good luck to you Oro , signing off .... wow....
 

Good afternoon my Friend BB:

Yes, i "do" understand what you are saying and your thinking, however, I wish that you would clarify / double check it with another system of mathamatics, not the decimal one that you used - my finger and toes thingie.. If it is true, it will hold up in any math.

Don Jose de La Mancha

BB's fith wave / dimension = 5 pulses, not cycles in picture. Simple enough.
:
 

Attachments

  • BB\'s prime 5th wave..jpg
    BB\'s prime 5th wave..jpg
    99.9 KB · Views: 192
Real de Tayopa said:
Good afternoon my Friend BB:

Yes, i "do" understand what you are saying and your thinking, however, I wish that you would clarify / double check it with another system of mathamatics, not the decimal one that you used - my finger and toes thingie.. If it is true, it will hold up in any math.

Don Jose de La Mancha

BB's fith wave / dimension = 5 pulses, not cycles in picture. Simple enough.
:

i did ,yes in fact its in the lower short wave range ,very odd t see a signial in this range with those binaries .. that dosent happend at any other range .. my father was a radio man on a b29 in the roren war , he then sold discoveries to the USAF , haveing discoverd over 1700 diffrent discoveries . i grew up watch him repair and fix thousand of things threw the years ..its in my blood to be able to disimble things and put them back togather again ...note each of those pulses go into infinity ,, ever 3x ,5x , 7x,11x and so on are reflective of the base prime times other prime numbers but take note the 9 is used even if it has been removed from the prime numbers it was still a odd number even if it held and value as a nuetronic number .....

if you back track from 15 to 9 you note there is 6 numbers missing yet when you place the even number between them you define the +3 patern of the nuetronic scale ..

note one very interesting detail note the number two is the only prime needed to create the same patterns in the even primes .. yes i know what prime numbers are and for no better way to lable these even number patterns i name them even prime , yet under stand when the prime number were define there were no even primes so the definition only was writen to applie to the odd primes ...we have not talked about the rpime sequence .. with the even prime above the nuetronic prime and the odd prime below the nuetronic the atomic structure becomes very defind .. i have been applieing these patterns to the elements it may explan why the elements are not evenly spaced and show no real patterns . much in the same way as the elements..


i am trying to use this prime sequence to define a way to open a few more dimensions,,,shhhhh they dont know yet ...

and you are correct that is a hormonic sine wave and could very well be a pulse freqency.... the fact is we have not had time to defind the out line of this discovery as of yet ...


besides i will be takeing off time for a few weeks ... it took almost 15 days to slow my thinking down after the test was over .. the side ffects are not fun and take weeks to get over ....i was sleeping 2-3 hours every 24 ...so my down time is comeing up...i will rest and take some needed RNR
 

Re: the everything site ...? (VERY long reply - extra coffee alert!)

HOLA amigos,
HOO boy this is going to be a very LONG reply, so I must beg your indulgence once again.

First, a warm WELCOME Furness to Treasurenet! I know Furness and he is a pretty decent person, and also know that he has been following this thread so did not just "jump in" without having read everything up to this point. He is certainly not an internet 'troll'.

Blindbowman wrote:
"and the evidence of science would refute that all matter is absolutely stationary"

sad ....now i know you dont want me to answer this question but you ask ...

thats a trick question .. are talking about the effects of the other frist 4 elements moveing atomic matter or are we talking about the matter moveing it self ...? growing or moveing on your own is something diffrent ....yes we are define a paradox . when we say matter can grow and move yet remain still or move by other forces ...so gravity can move a atomic molecule yet the molecule is not moveing under its own power to a diffrent location . not asking if it is moveing by growth of its own size ....thus a the frist 4 element can effect motion on something that is absolutely stationary of its own makeing ...

It was certainly not intended as a trick question amigo, and I respectfully disagree about matter "growing". Expansion and contraction due to heat and cold influences, (also due to gravitational influence) yes - but simply "growing" of its own accord, I do not see this as possible. If it were, we would be able to "grow" about any kind of matter without requiring any kind of input of other matter or energy, which is not the case.

Blindbowman also wrote:
"the only way that matter could be absolutely stationary would be if it were cooled to the temperature of absolute zero, which has been virtually impossible to reach even in the best labs. "

no if you wanted to have absolutely stationary of atomic matter and the volume around it ,that would work..

with the under standing that even the box that contains the test effects the out come ...so it may only work in thoery...

Hmm it appears that perhaps you do not understand the physics of matter amigo - for even contained in a box, the molecules would continue to be vibrating and electrons orbiting. The only thing which can speed up or slow down the orbital motion of molecules is heat and cold, at least as far as I know - and I am not a physicist. Are you saying that enclosing some matter in some kind of container will cause the molecular motion to cease?

Blindbowman also wrote:
"again referring to the universe"
the volume of the universe is what is moveing ,not the matter it self under its own causes & effects ...

"they make no sound whatsoever "

that we can hear as humans .. and what is to say the sound they are makeing is not at a magnetic level .. maybe the cloud air mass reacts like a capacitor thus the sound is not released untill it reaches a level that over welms the volume ..creating thunder under the right conditions


I respectfully disagree here too amigo, matter is what is moving in the universe, volume is a measure. I would also have to respectfully disagree about the second part also, the clouds do not make thunder amigo, thunder is a reactive sound from lightning, as our amigo Real de Tayopa posted above. The clouds themselves do not make audible sounds. If they are making "sounds" at a magnetic level (frequency) then by definition it is not sound but magnetism. I would very much hesitate to attribute some magnetic force to clouds, though they do usually carry quite an electrical (static) charge, as far as I know no magnetic influence is being exhibited.

Blindbowman also wrote:
"This makes no sense to me - please explain how matter can "grow"?

the 5th element defines all matter grows .. from within .. if you waited for a few million years yes you might be able to messure the growth under the right conditions

As mentioned above, I respectfully disagree that matter "grows". Earth has been in existence for billions of years and the only "growth" has been due to 1: - expansion from the heat within, and 2: - accumulation of matter/debris captured from space, such as meteorites, comets etc that fall to the planet. As we know that some 37,000-78,000 tons of space matter is added to Earth each year, our planet is in fact "growing" each year and over time (as in millions of years) the amount is quite considerable. I cannot see how matter could "grow" on its own, this would require that the molecules would be multiplying, like living organisms, and this has never been observed by science. Molecules simply do not multiply on their own.

Blindbowman also wrote:
look at it this way if matter did not grow it could not exspan ether or contract ...we think of matter of a object as developed ,yet matter is always moveing and growing .. even if we see it as absolutely stationary within a volume .thats what makes this discovery diffrent . it explans what we dont see ...

even if we dont see something it dose not mean that it dosent effect what we do see ..

"and how could the simple act of growth cause sound to be emitted? "

think of the earth being a large cell of atomic matter . dose the earth contract and exspan ,yes . dose it make sound when it dose ... yes ...

Why does matter have to GROW in order to expand or contract? Matter can "grow" in one way, that is on a molecular level if we have a chemical reaction with OTHER matter, the molecules can bond with other molecules and become a new (compound) matter, like carbon and oxygen combining to become CO2 but it is not real "growth" because it is simply the addition of matter to matter. The earth makes sound when it expands and contracts - yes - but NOT always, and many many things expand and contract without emitting a sound. Besides, it is not the expansion/contraction that emits the sounds, it is the friction of the rock/earth against other rock/earth.

Blindbowman also wrote:
(+) EVEN

(N) nuetronic (+-,-+)

(-) odd

let me ask you a question ...(+-,-+) are these the same (-+,+-) or do they react diffrent to the values around them or to a over all pattern when the order is change...?

i agree but the human life span is not long enough to collect that data ....lol

I would say that those two examples are made up of similar elements, but are not identical; as they have opposite polarities, it is obvious that they would react differently to values around them, depending on what those values were. Of course if they are purely mathematical values, then they are identical and both negate themselves having no effect on numerical values around them.

Blindbowman also wrote:
you say remote veiwing . i know i go way beyond that <snip>

I use that term (remote viewing) as a term that I have some familiarity with and a basic understanding of, when I use it in describing your own activity, it is only as a descriptive term. I am not sure what sort of psychic activity you are doing, and based on your statements if it were myself, I would have serious doubts about what is being received - for where exactly is the defining line between the real and what could be simply emanations of the subconscious mind - imagination? How do you discern what is real information and what is simply coming from within, rather like a dream?

Blindbowman also wrote:
knowing time and space is reachable in this manner .. there must be a infinity of realies ..way beyond anything we could ever dream of ...note , i will give you a taste of what i am talking about to help you under stand ,, we are standing at the grave site of the nephew . we picture the event of his shoting . we see the sun of the morning day starting . we picture the anger between the two waltz and the jessy,... next thing we know are mind is watching the blood run down jessy's face as he falls . we can be jessy or waltz at any time we wish to ... with the under standing fear will end our vission .. yet only if we fear death or danger .. let your mind build the vission and dirrection it goes . correct it if you know something that dse .. but your mind can tell you what is happpening as well as leting you relive what waltz did back then .. but when conditioned to think like waltz your mind reacts as he did ... it becomes so defind to what tyhe vission is over time , each time you step into the vission you can add more or change it ... thus you see the events with a insight .only waltz and jessy could ever know ...dont under stand the history of waltz .. become one with him and be waltz why the vission is being conditioned to reflect what is known in the hopes of under standing the coditions that took place at the time of the real event thus . you in all prospective relive the event your self ..it dosent matter if you go back in time your mind well never know it any way .. it cant tell the diffrence ..

This is easy to do amigo, but is also extremely easy to mislead one's own self by imagining the past and the events that took place. We can readily put our mind into what we BELIEVE to be the mind of someone like Waltz, but in reality we are imagining and guessing - only Waltz (and if anyone is religious, God) really and truly knew what was in the mind of Jacob Waltz. I could give you an example here but we have already covered (some time ago) the dangers inherent when we proceed from an assumption that very well could be FALSE.

******
An aside here to any "newbies" who might be reading our banter - when you are researching any lost treasure, try to think like a crime detective - don't let theories and personal ideas come to out-weigh the evidence you have found. Say someone finds a bloody butcher knife - should we assume that this must be a MURDER weapon, or is it also possible that the knive could have been used for what it was designed for - butchering meat? Stick to what is proven as you proceed in your research and you will find those lost treasures.
*******

Blindbowman also wrote:
i was talking to pythagoras and a few others i dont remember their names right of hand .. but . we was telling me atlas , had been the frist king of atlantis and he showed me a map of atlantis . i told him i know where that is and he stated what he knew a bout the events that had taken pplace back then ...when i said we dont fully under stand how this took place he stated the ocean rive ended at atlantis before it sank . the map he showed me was made from the map of the codex i found and it was to the same scale as the codex .. he lol when he ask how do you know this scale .i lol and said only the smart under stand it ...

You spoke with Pythagoras? As in, you spoke with him in a previous life, or are you saying that you spoke with him recently? Yes Atlas was said to be the first king of Atlantis, and it is possible that the great Gulf stream actually "shut down" (stopped flowing) when so much ice suddenly melted at the end of the last Ice Age. Saying that you spoke with Pythagoras is a good example of what I mentioned above - for how can you ever be certain that you actually spoke with Pythagoras, and that it was NOT simply an emanation of your own subconscious, silently providing the actor and speech to satisfy your own curiosity? This is where remote viewing does seem to have limits, or at least is into a very GREY area, where there is no way to be sure that what you are experiencing is NOT something coming from within rather than from without.

Blindbowman also wrote:
see if his map was his or my mind related the two i would not have know the two were related .. but my mind did .. even if i was not conscious of the fact i knew it ,,thus i open a path to the un conscious part of the mind

How then can you be SURE that the map, Pythagoras, the conversation etc were NOT all simply products of your own subconscious mind? Did Pythagoras provide you some piece of information that would prove it beyond all doubt?

Blindbowman also wrote:
dirrect your vission to the right time and place and it will open your sub conscious to for fill your vission ... you may know more then you think you do ....lol

Opening the subconscious could be a double-edged sword amigo, for it could well be the source of the information then received, and thus be utterly un-trustworthy as simple products of the imagination. I like to paraphrase an old friend about what I know, that is I know only how little I know. We humans are fairly limited creatures, even compared with the animal kingdom - consider how much information a dog is able to detect from the environment using only its nose, we can only sense the most powerful smells and then only for a few moments before our olfactory nerves are overloaded.

Blindbowman also wrote:
name your sorces ... think again, i took these binary worms to the 186 292 to the speed of light .. i have no idea what your talking about and i dont beleive you do ...lol sorry newbe the even primes do the same thing with the number 2 .. if you dont under stand what this is about just say so ...i am in contact with over 20 people that are trying to work with this discovery and no it has never been found before aug 4th if what you were saying was true the multiables of the prime would go so far and end ,, thats impossble with the patterns i found ...i like this site but every time ,nothing but trolls

"primes are as stated in any maths book an integer that cannot be divided into other integers except by itself or 1 "
no [prohibited word deleted] dick tracy , we are talking about the spaces between the prime numbers ...wow ..i am sick of the trolls and people that dont have a clue you come here and you reply you dont even under stand what the discovery is and you voiceing your negitive opioions about something you dont even under stand .

.. good luck to you Oro , signing off .... wow....

Well amigo as I mentioned above, Furness is a pretty decent and intelligent guy, NOT a troll - and certainly you don't think someone is a troll simply because they might disagree with you about something right? I sure don't, or it would seem that everyone is a troll to me! :o ::) ;D :D No need to get defensive amigo, not over a disagreement. Besides, if we all were in total agreement, our discussion would get VERY boring fast! :'(

Blindbowman also wrote:
besides i will be takeing off time for a few weeks ... it took almost 15 days to slow my thinking down after the test was over .. the side ffects are not fun and take weeks to get over ....i was sleeping 2-3 hours every 24 ...so my down time is comeing up...i will rest and take some needed RNR

I am glad to hear that you are going to take some time off amigo - heck even a work horse is allowed a rest you know! So your whole new theory here is simply a self-test, and NOT related to the sites in any way? I hate to keep bugging you asking about this but I have failed to see the connection(s). If you like taking self-tests, I could suggest a few that you might enjoy and only take a few minutes of your time. At any rate thank you for your indulgence, enjoy your time off and as always.....

good luck and good hunting to you all amigos, I hope you find the treasures that you seek.
your friend,
Oroblanco
 

Re: the everything site ...? (VERY long reply - extra coffee alert!)

Oroblanco said:
HOLA amigos,
HOO boy this is going to be a very LONG reply, so I must beg your indulgence once again.

First, a warm WELCOME Furness to Treasurenet! I know Furness and he is a pretty decent person, and also know that he has been following this thread so did not just "jump in" without having read everything up to this point. He is certainly not an internet 'troll'.

Blindbowman wrote:
"and the evidence of science would refute that all matter is absolutely stationary"

sad ....now i know you dont want me to answer this question but you ask ...

thats a trick question .. are talking about the effects of the other frist 4 elements moveing atomic matter or are we talking about the matter moveing it self ...? growing or moveing on your own is something diffrent ....yes we are define a paradox . when we say matter can grow and move yet remain still or move by other forces ...so gravity can move a atomic molecule yet the molecule is not moveing under its own power to a diffrent location . not asking if it is moveing by growth of its own size ....thus a the frist 4 element can effect motion on something that is absolutely stationary of its own makeing ...

It was certainly not intended as a trick question amigo, and I respectfully disagree about matter "growing". Expansion and contraction due to heat and cold influences, (also due to gravitational influence) yes - but simply "growing" of its own accord, I do not see this as possible. If it were, we would be able to "grow" about any kind of matter without requiring any kind of input of other matter or energy, which is not the case.

Blindbowman also wrote:
"the only way that matter could be absolutely stationary would be if it were cooled to the temperature of absolute zero, which has been virtually impossible to reach even in the best labs. "

no if you wanted to have absolutely stationary of atomic matter and the volume around it ,that would work..

with the under standing that even the box that contains the test effects the out come ...so it may only work in thoery...

Hmm it appears that perhaps you do not understand the physics of matter amigo - for even contained in a box, the molecules would continue to be vibrating and electrons orbiting. The only thing which can speed up or slow down the orbital motion of molecules is heat and cold, at least as far as I know - and I am not a physicist. Are you saying that enclosing some matter in some kind of container will cause the molecular motion to cease?

Blindbowman also wrote:
"again referring to the universe"
the volume of the universe is what is moveing ,not the matter it self under its own causes & effects ...

"they make no sound whatsoever "

that we can hear as humans .. and what is to say the sound they are makeing is not at a magnetic level .. maybe the cloud air mass reacts like a capacitor thus the sound is not released untill it reaches a level that over welms the volume ..creating thunder under the right conditions


I respectfully disagree here too amigo, matter is what is moving in the universe, volume is a measure. I would also have to respectfully disagree about the second part also, the clouds do not make thunder amigo, thunder is a reactive sound from lightning, as our amigo Real de Tayopa posted above. The clouds themselves do not make audible sounds. If they are making "sounds" at a magnetic level (frequency) then by definition it is not sound but magnetism. I would very much hesitate to attribute some magnetic force to clouds, though they do usually carry quite an electrical (static) charge, as far as I know no magnetic influence is being exhibited.

Blindbowman also wrote:
"This makes no sense to me - please explain how matter can "grow"?

the 5th element defines all matter grows .. from within .. if you waited for a few million years yes you might be able to messure the growth under the right conditions

As mentioned above, I respectfully disagree that matter "grows". Earth has been in existence for billions of years and the only "growth" has been due to 1: - expansion from the heat within, and 2: - accumulation of matter/debris captured from space, such as meteorites, comets etc that fall to the planet. As we know that some 37,000-78,000 tons of space matter is added to Earth each year, our planet is in fact "growing" each year and over time (as in millions of years) the amount is quite considerable. I cannot see how matter could "grow" on its own, this would require that the molecules would be multiplying, like living organisms, and this has never been observed by science. Molecules simply do not multiply on their own.

Blindbowman also wrote:
look at it this way if matter did not grow it could not exspan ether or contract ...we think of matter of a object as developed ,yet matter is always moveing and growing .. even if we see it as absolutely stationary within a volume .thats what makes this discovery diffrent . it explans what we dont see ...

even if we dont see something it dose not mean that it dosent effect what we do see ..

"and how could the simple act of growth cause sound to be emitted? "

think of the earth being a large cell of atomic matter . dose the earth contract and exspan ,yes . dose it make sound when it dose ... yes ...

Why does matter have to GROW in order to expand or contract? Matter can "grow" in one way, that is on a molecular level if we have a chemical reaction with OTHER matter, the molecules can bond with other molecules and become a new (compound) matter, like carbon and oxygen combining to become CO2 but it is not real "growth" because it is simply the addition of matter to matter. The earth makes sound when it expands and contracts - yes - but NOT always, and many many things expand and contract without emitting a sound. Besides, it is not the expansion/contraction that emits the sounds, it is the friction of the rock/earth against other rock/earth.

Blindbowman also wrote:
(+) EVEN

(N) nuetronic (+-,-+)

(-) odd

let me ask you a question ...(+-,-+) are these the same (-+,+-) or do they react diffrent to the values around them or to a over all pattern when the order is change...?

i agree but the human life span is not long enough to collect that data ....lol

I would say that those two examples are made up of similar elements, but are not identical; as they have opposite polarities, it is obvious that they would react differently to values around them, depending on what those values were. Of course if they are purely mathematical values, then they are identical and both negate themselves having no effect on numerical values around them.

Blindbowman also wrote:
you say remote veiwing . i know i go way beyond that <snip>

I use that term (remote viewing) as a term that I have some familiarity with and a basic understanding of, when I use it in describing your own activity, it is only as a descriptive term. I am not sure what sort of psychic activity you are doing, and based on your statements if it were myself, I would have serious doubts about what is being received - for where exactly is the defining line between the real and what could be simply emanations of the subconscious mind - imagination? How do you discern what is real information and what is simply coming from within, rather like a dream?

Blindbowman also wrote:
knowing time and space is reachable in this manner .. there must be a infinity of realies ..way beyond anything we could ever dream of ...note , i will give you a taste of what i am talking about to help you under stand ,, we are standing at the grave site of the nephew . we picture the event of his shoting . we see the sun of the morning day starting . we picture the anger between the two waltz and the jessy,... next thing we know are mind is watching the blood run down jessy's face as he falls . we can be jessy or waltz at any time we wish to ... with the under standing fear will end our vission .. yet only if we fear death or danger .. let your mind build the vission and dirrection it goes . correct it if you know something that dse .. but your mind can tell you what is happpening as well as leting you relive what waltz did back then .. but when conditioned to think like waltz your mind reacts as he did ... it becomes so defind to what tyhe vission is over time , each time you step into the vission you can add more or change it ... thus you see the events with a insight .only waltz and jessy could ever know ...dont under stand the history of waltz .. become one with him and be waltz why the vission is being conditioned to reflect what is known in the hopes of under standing the coditions that took place at the time of the real event thus . you in all prospective relive the event your self ..it dosent matter if you go back in time your mind well never know it any way .. it cant tell the diffrence ..

This is easy to do amigo, but is also extremely easy to mislead one's own self by imagining the past and the events that took place. We can readily put our mind into what we BELIEVE to be the mind of someone like Waltz, but in reality we are imagining and guessing - only Waltz (and if anyone is religious, God) really and truly knew what was in the mind of Jacob Waltz. I could give you an example here but we have already covered (some time ago) the dangers inherent when we proceed from an assumption that very well could be FALSE.

******
An aside here to any "newbies" who might be reading our banter - when you are researching any lost treasure, try to think like a crime detective - don't let theories and personal ideas come to out-weigh the evidence you have found. Say someone finds a bloody butcher knife - should we assume that this must be a MURDER weapon, or is it also possible that the knive could have been used for what it was designed for - butchering meat? Stick to what is proven as you proceed in your research and you will find those lost treasures.
*******

Blindbowman also wrote:
i was talking to pythagoras and a few others i dont remember their names right of hand .. but . we was telling me atlas , had been the frist king of atlantis and he showed me a map of atlantis . i told him i know where that is and he stated what he knew a bout the events that had taken pplace back then ...when i said we dont fully under stand how this took place he stated the ocean rive ended at atlantis before it sank . the map he showed me was made from the map of the codex i found and it was to the same scale as the codex .. he lol when he ask how do you know this scale .i lol and said only the smart under stand it ...

You spoke with Pythagoras? As in, you spoke with him in a previous life, or are you saying that you spoke with him recently? Yes Atlas was said to be the first king of Atlantis, and it is possible that the great Gulf stream actually "shut down" (stopped flowing) when so much ice suddenly melted at the end of the last Ice Age. Saying that you spoke with Pythagoras is a good example of what I mentioned above - for how can you ever be certain that you actually spoke with Pythagoras, and that it was NOT simply an emanation of your own subconscious, silently providing the actor and speech to satisfy your own curiosity? This is where remote viewing does seem to have limits, or at least is into a very GREY area, where there is no way to be sure that what you are experiencing is NOT something coming from within rather than from without.

Blindbowman also wrote:
see if his map was his or my mind related the two i would not have know the two were related .. but my mind did .. even if i was not conscious of the fact i knew it ,,thus i open a path to the un conscious part of the mind

How then can you be SURE that the map, Pythagoras, the conversation etc were NOT all simply products of your own subconscious mind? Did Pythagoras provide you some piece of information that would prove it beyond all doubt?

Blindbowman also wrote:
dirrect your vission to the right time and place and it will open your sub conscious to for fill your vission ... you may know more then you think you do ....lol

Opening the subconscious could be a double-edged sword amigo, for it could well be the source of the information then received, and thus be utterly un-trustworthy as simple products of the imagination. I like to paraphrase an old friend about what I know, that is I know only how little I know. We humans are fairly limited creatures, even compared with the animal kingdom - consider how much information a dog is able to detect from the environment using only its nose, we can only sense the most powerful smells and then only for a few moments before our olfactory nerves are overloaded.

Blindbowman also wrote:
name your sorces ... think again, i took these binary worms to the 186 292 to the speed of light .. i have no idea what your talking about and i dont beleive you do ...lol sorry newbe the even primes do the same thing with the number 2 .. if you dont under stand what this is about just say so ...i am in contact with over 20 people that are trying to work with this discovery and no it has never been found before aug 4th if what you were saying was true the multiables of the prime would go so far and end ,, thats impossble with the patterns i found ...i like this site but every time ,nothing but trolls

"primes are as stated in any maths book an integer that cannot be divided into other integers except by itself or 1 "
no [prohibited word deleted] dick tracy , we are talking about the spaces between the prime numbers ...wow ..i am sick of the trolls and people that dont have a clue you come here and you reply you dont even under stand what the discovery is and you voiceing your negitive opioions about something you dont even under stand .

.. good luck to you Oro , signing off .... wow....

Well amigo as I mentioned above, Furness is a pretty decent and intelligent guy, NOT a troll - and certainly you don't think someone is a troll simply because they might disagree with you about something right? I sure don't, or it would seem that everyone is a troll to me! :o ::) ;D :D No need to get defensive amigo, not over a disagreement. Besides, if we all were in total agreement, our discussion would get VERY boring fast! :'(

Blindbowman also wrote:
besides i will be takeing off time for a few weeks ... it took almost 15 days to slow my thinking down after the test was over .. the side ffects are not fun and take weeks to get over ....i was sleeping 2-3 hours every 24 ...so my down time is comeing up...i will rest and take some needed RNR

I am glad to hear that you are going to take some time off amigo - heck even a work horse is allowed a rest you know! So your whole new theory here is simply a self-test, and NOT related to the sites in any way? I hate to keep bugging you asking about this but I have failed to see the connection(s). If you like taking self-tests, I could suggest a few that you might enjoy and only take a few minutes of your time. At any rate thank you for your indulgence, enjoy your time off and as always.....

good luck and good hunting to you all amigos, I hope you find the treasures that you seek.
your friend,
Oroblanco


... Furness dosent under stand what he is saysing is out right impossable yet it didnt stop him from saysing it ,did it ..


3x any odd number . those odd numbers dont stop at 1,262... they are inifinite and anyone that would come into a debate and voice negitive opioion with out even under standing what they are saysing is total follishness . is not here to deguss the topic with a open mind ... wow

all even and odd balances are controlled by the 5th element

anything that aposes its inverse oppisite ....

the patterns dont stop, they are infinite ..

they may over lap and hit at the same place at times but they never end ...they are a progressive series of multi binary of the multiables of odd numbers ! fact !

you cant even see the even prime patterns with out under standing the full meaning of the odd primes ...


as i clearly pionted out the even primes do not fit the definition of prime number as it is writtern,, how could it .. they didnt even know they were there till i discoverd them ...




if you dont under stand what this discovery ...you could have just said so ....

latter

good luck to you Furness

... learn to think before you speak .......
 

Qoute: "good luck to you Furness... learn to think before you speak ......."

Why? it never stopped you BB

Although I understand your superior air, after all the hundreds of discoveries you have made that have rewritten more than one history book. If you want to write about your possible discoveries without any input from anyone, then might I suggest a private journal would be a better place than a public forum.
When people make great claims, they leave themselves open to questions and examination of thier claims. This is where you lack most of all BB.
And that was certainly no way to greet a new member because they may have noted a flaw in your claim.
 

Furness,

Bowman's natural tendency to think he is so much smarter and wiser than all of us has caused him to go back and delete almost all of his posts.
He very often posts without thinking.
And must go back and grudgingly delete the embarrassment,
once he discovers he can no longer prolong the farce.
 

Don't mind BB - he isn't looking for discussion unless of course you agree with him 100%. If he were truly interested in discussing his discoveries, he certainly wouldn't be posting them here - this is an extremely small microcosm of the population, the vast majority of whom have no background whatsoever in his current theories. On the other hand, perhaps that's why he posts them here - given the tone of his responses to our questions, it's fairly evident to see what would happen if he were to discuss them with physicists and mathematicians.

Did anyone else find it rather interesting and amusing that a person would choose to "put themselves to a test" of their own intelligence? Isn't that rather like the fox watching the henhouse? :)

I'm still at a loss as to understanding how this fits into the topic of "Treasure Legends," but then again all I am is a troll so what I say doesn't matter. I also fail to understand why a person who has said on numerous occassions that he doesn't care one whit about the human race would get irritable when his theories are questioned but us mere mortals - not caring should include not showing any emotion when questioned no?

The more I read BB's posts (at least the ones he didn't delete or edit), the more I'm reminded of "A Beautiful Mind."
 

Hi Guys, Peer OD CF jose and mi amigo oro, from another yahoo who has joined the group thank you all for the welcome, :)

when i discovered T net i spent about four days reading the posts mainly in this section LDM Tayopa etc,
terrific stuff like a good book i couldn't turn off the comp,

i have no problem with anything BB writes just his attitude (as Oro Knows from my comments in my emails to him) if anyone questions him and his dismissal of anyone who doesn't understand his theories as a halfwit, as for a lot of the stuff he wrote i did manage to catch some before he deleted it,
but i have been reading the posts for some time and have managed to do as real says relax and go with the flow, that's why it has taken me this long to join, :)
once again thanks for the welcome guys,

Hi Oro a special thanks for the support and welcome, i hope you and beth are well, and that you get the house finished before winter,

js
 

Real de Tayopa said:
Good morning FURNESS: RELAX is the key word, just roll withit. You should have seen some of my pm's when I mentioned having found and now owning TAYOPA, he heheh.

Don Jose de La Mancha

Hola mi amigo, I trust they were from those who doubted you, not those who held you in enough esteem to know that what you found was Tayopa.
 

Real de Tayopa said:
Good morning FURNESS: RELAX is the key word, just roll withit. You should have seen some of my pm's when I mentioned having found and now owning TAYOPA, he heheh.

Don Jose de La Mancha


Mi amigo Don Jose,

Look all you want, my friend you will never find a case of my ever having doubted you.
Only a heartfelt congrats.

I like to see the work and research all come together.

I appreciate the same regard you have given me all this time
It has been nothing less than inspiring to have at least one friend somewhere,
who doesn't think I'm nuts. LOL

Peerless67

I fully expect to see a photo in my email simply signed GP someday.
I have seen your research and I agree with your findings.
You will either find it or find where it was.
Either way a score.

Thom
 

Paul,

"And for just $399.95 ($799.95 for the "macro" version), you too can have an Atlantean Power Crystal!

http://www.lifetechnology.org/atlanteanpower.htm"

This is the real secret to bb's knowledge. It's called the Internet. Should it end tomorrow, bb would have nothing to say. It explains his limited response to technical questions from some of our more erudite "yahoos". The Internet sites do not require someone to think or theorize, only a small degree of ability to parrot is required to become an expert in the subject.

When bb tries to theorize beyond the site du jour, he quickly slips into fantasy. The reason bb brings his.....stuff here, is because they would ridicule him ten times as much as we do. Does anyone actually do more than lightly skim these posts?

What in the world does all of this have to do with Treasure Legends? Perhaps bb can explain that in his next elucidation.

Take care,

Joe
 

Hi CJ,

i don't think your nuts, and I've also read a lot of your posts, your just very observant and I'm still laughing at the last one,

js
 

ya now we hear from OJ lol ..

come on Furness
what are your sorces that the goverment is working on this type of binary .. i find that totally shocking seeing how the goverment had never seen this before i released it ..

you stated . the patterns stop after they reach a given number ,, explan that ,.. its in possable so this should be worth hearing how you explan it .. why would you make something up to degrade my discovery when you dont even under stand what it is ...this is a total joke

every time anyone post something of value . along comes some troll to degrade it and then comes the jokes and foolish minded ...

you should all be ashame of what your doing .. you fail to under stand anything beyond your own little worlds .. and god for bid anyone trys to show you anything beyond your close minded ways

you deserve to be here with the rest of these so gifted people ....


what did you expect Furness

you dont under stand the discovery at all or you would not have made that totally foolish statement in the frist place ...

i welcome you to treasure net .. you will most likely fit right in ....


whats really going on .. i found the LDM over a year ago and i have been misleeding everyone sence then ....lol

end of story...!

you cant hang ... you have no chance of finding the LDM . i made sure of that .... lol lol

let me Quote ..how dose that go

" i hope you find the treasure you seek "


lol not !
 

cactusjumper said:
Paul,

"And for just $399.95 ($799.95 for the "macro" version), you too can have an Atlantean Power Crystal!

http://www.lifetechnology.org/atlanteanpower.htm"

This is the real secret to bb's knowledge. It's called the Internet. Should it end tomorrow, bb would have nothing to say. It explains his limited response to technical questions from some of our more erudite "yahoos". The Internet sites do not require someone to think or theorize, only a small degree of ability to parrot is required to become an expert in the subject.

When bb tries to theorize beyond the site du jour, he quickly slips into fantasy. The reason bb brings his.....stuff here, is because they would ridicule him ten times as much as we do. Does anyone actually do more than lightly skim these posts?

What in the world does all of this have to do with Treasure Legends? Perhaps bb can explain that in his next elucidation.

Take care,

Joe

lol

your so smart was it Pythagoras who traveled to Egypt and Babylon ,,,...? thats funny Plato stated he had .. and he stated he was working on prime numbers ,, yet plato stated the dirrection to Atlantis . he had never been to where those dirrection started from .. the logical reason is plato copied them from Pythagoras notes & writeings ...

Pythagoras built a temple at the site in sicily agrigento, where the dirrections of plato start the only problem with that is plato never went there ...

its IMHO that Pythagoras got the dirrections from fishmen that had been in contact with atlas at atlantis , why because the same scale is used on the codex that i used to find atlantis & chicomoztoc with the same dirrections i back tract to sicily agrigento...

did i find something from atlantis at chicomoztoc ...


good question .....lol
 

pronghorn said:
the blindbowman said:
ya now we hear from OJ lol ..

come on Furness
what are your sorces that the goverment is working on this type of binary .. i find that totally shocking seeing how the goverment had never seen this before i released it ..

you stated . the patterns stop after they reach a given number ,, explan that ,.. its in possable so this should be worth hearing how you explan it .. why would you make something up to degrade my discovery when you dont even under stand what it is ...this is a total joke

every time anyone post something of value . along comes some troll to degrade it and then comes the jokes and foolish minded ...

you should all be ashame of what your doing .. you fail to under stand anything beyond your own little worlds .. and god for bid anyone trys to show you anything beyond your close minded ways

you deserve to be here with the rest of these so gifted people ....


what did you expect Furness

you dont under stand the discovery at all or you would not have made that totally foolish statement in the frist place ...

i welcome you to treasure net .. you will most likely fit right in ....


whats really going on .. i found the LDM over a year ago and i have been misleeding everyone sence then ....lol

end of story...!

you cant hang ... you have no chance of finding the LDM . i made sure of that .... lol lol

let me Quote ..how dose that go

" i hope you find the treasure you seek "


lol not !

BB, I think you need to recheck, Furness did not say the " goverment is working on this type of binary " he stated

all i will add at this point is that BB's claim that he has discovered the fifth element is about two years to late,
it was discovered and is being worked on at the present time in The US and probably by now in other countries by any number of mathematicians and physicists,

[/quote]

I don't mean to imply that I understand this latest detour, just wanted to clarify and see if I might qualify as an honorary "yahoo" boing
Oh yeah, and I wanted to quote you BB incase you decided to delete your previous post.

[/quote]

good catch ,i missread the foolishness ... i guess we are all human after all ... well i am ...lol
 

Oro,

[SETI stands for "Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence" BTW) I would presume that "they don't answer" because we are not sending any signal aimed at "them"]

It seems obvious that bb doesn't understand the difference between sending and receiving. Beyond that, perhaps SETI should point their ears in a New York direction. :D

Take care,

Joe
 

its IMHO that Pythagoras got the dirrections from fishmen that had been in contact with atlas at atlantis

Funny, but I have yet to see a single humble statement from you.

Could you provide us with a legitimate physicist or mathematician you've run your latest theory past who can coraborate the validity of your discovery? I know you're not here to "prove" yourself to any of us, you've explained numerous times how much contempt and disdain you have for all of us when someone questions you and you've repeatedly exclaimed how you couldn't care less what any of us think - the problem with all those statements is that logic (you like to use that term) dictates that two of those statements by you are false based on your reaction and responses.

Surely you're intelligent enough to know that your "game" has little or no impact on any of us anymore right? One of the reasons many of us come here is for the same reason that so many people tune in to watch WWF - everyone knows it's fake, but it's entertaining and you never know what outrageous thing will happen next.
 

did you know there were a full set of those codex and the one found is only part of a full set .based on prime numbers ..

why do you think i was so posstive i had found Atlantis ...

Pythagoras could not openly speak friendly of those that had been cast out of their culture or he could be cast out as well .IMHO this is the same reaction Plato gives ..

IMHO Pythagoras learned about the prime numbers from Atlantis .and they learned about them from chicomoztoc ...why because chicomoztoc predates Atlantis ....and the basic luner scale is a prime binary scale .


you guys are so much smarted then i am , figer it out for your selfs ....

i got to see this .. your combined wisdom should solve this in a few hours ...


come on you want to play .. lets hear it ....


dont worry ,what do i get out of this i get to watch you all realize you were wrong ...
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top