I am new to both prospecting and treasure hunting, but, having been an Intel Analyst in the Marine Corps (Let the oxymoron jokes commence), I am not knew to using my brain housing group to solve problems and answer questions. I am also pretty sharp at seeing what is useful and what is not. One thing that always gets under my skin just a little is dismissing information because it doesn't come from a "valid source." Information is information, most of it can be useful, and, ime, most of the valid intel I ended up with started with a trail that began as information that came from what some would consider an "invaild source." Is there in fact a LDM? Maybe, perhaps even probably, we will know for sure when we find it. Until then we can use what we do know, and what information we are given to search. The way information becomes valid actionable intelligence is by gathering information, testing it's validity or probability, and comparing it to what we know and other information. My point is NEVER disregard something straight away because it isn't properly sourced. If you do that, you're a file clerk, not a hunter. That kid who says his cousin knew a guy who's grandpa said the mine was in such and so a place, just MIGHT be on to something. Peace and good hunting.