Obama using computer-generated Twitterbots

[Chadeaux]

A question is just a question no matter what your feelings are or why you think it was asked. And I think the question is an extremely legit one - dont you? if there was a tremendous amount of fraud in the last election why didnt the Romney campaign and the Republican Party immediate launch lawsuits across the country contesting the results in every state, county, etc, etc. I do not have the answer which is why I am asking the question

The problem an assertion like that is that words have meanings. Meanings evoke responses.

Don't you agree that if even ONE U.S. citizen who wished to vote was deprived the right to do so, it would be a crime?

Isn't that why the voter protection laws were put into place in the south in the 1960's?

Isn't anyone voting more than once effectively depriving others of the right to vote by negating their vote?

Lawsuits haven't taken place . . . why? Could it be that video evidence of voter intimidation during the previous administration was rejected by the Attorney General of the U.S. as being unimportant? It will likewise be dealt with if serious allegations came to light.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[Chadeaux]

Whoa dave is there any need to get personal with your responses? Do you feel that doing so helps you to make a point?

Are you a bot? Any direct response is addressed as though it is an attack. You feel it okay to provoke, but when you are called out you whine.

 

[Dave44]

You are touchy aren't you Mr picker?
I guess it is a personal question, that you have used often, repeatedly even, but are they false? I know of it because you posted it.

Anyway, as I have said, this is not the place for your conjecture on this. Red actually had a different point that we all strayed from, thank you.

I believe it had more to do with trying to sway opinion by making it look as if the policies of the Pres had merit,, by the shear #s?

We all know that Americans love getting behind a winner. Red made a point that the winners side has been populated with ghosts, displayed as numbers to try and persuade the unknowing to join them.

Or did I misstate your post Red?

Respectfully, Dave

 

[0121stockpicker]

Are you a bot? Any direct response is addressed as though it is an attack. You feel it okay to provoke, but when you are called out you whine.

Is any question or comment that doesn't fit into a narrow world view "provoking"? I think ive seen that accusation being leveled at other people. Do you wish for just everyone to agree with your brand of world view? Whining, not at all. Do I believe there is never a need to make personal comments in a discussion - yes. It's usually just a sign of someone's inability to enter into a meaningful discussion and done out of frustration at ones lack of ability. You see that a lot in the playground with children. Best.

 

[Dave44]

Respectfully, Mr Picker,, I was hoping that I would prod you to read previous posts when you said you could not think of why there is a winner or loser in race for the correct thesis. Maybe you should go read them, and then you can post on that instead of ignoring them?

This is why I have a hard time with your discussion, you either do not follow the whole discussion or are ignoring parts of it.

I try very hard to understand your points when you make them.
best

 

[Dano Sverige]

Are you a bot? Any direct response is addressed as though it is an attack. You feel it okay to provoke, but when you are called out you whine.

Always makes me chuckle when he comes out with this stuff!


This has all gone very technical and intellectual for some reason! No idea why, facts speak for themselves. Big O is in the white house...the other gang didn't kick up a fuss about it. Game over! If he cheated - he won. If he didn't - he won. Suck it up! In 4 years time you'll be doing the same posts about someone else!!

 

[0121stockpicker]

Always makes me chuckle when he comes out with this stuff!

Yes, I think you were one of those " provokes" weren't you? Funny how it is that the ones that talk the most about the constitution, freedoms, rights, god given, etc, etc are the first ones trying to shut down people's freedom to voice their thoughts and opinions. I guess those freedoms only exist if you buy into the correct world view. Funny how that happens.

 

[0121stockpicker]

Respectfully, Mr Picker,, I was hoping that I would prod you to read previous posts when you said you could not think of why there is a winner or loser in race for the correct thesis. Maybe you should go read them, and then you can post on that instead of ignoring them?

This is why I have a hard time with your discussion, you either do not follow the whole discussion or are ignoring parts of it.

I try very hard to understand your points when you make them.
best

You should prob go back and look at the first people who "got off topic" and started going off on the "massive vote fraud stuff". Prob need to go back an infirm those folks of their infraction.

 

[Dave44]

You should prob go back and look at the first people who "got off topic" and started going off on the "massive vote fraud stuff". Prob need to go back an infirm those folks of their infraction.

Hmm. This quote of the quote that I made was not the quote that you should have quoted. As a matter of fact this quote does not prop up your charges of infractions of off topic discussions.
Go back, Find the correct quote to support your argument and come back and quoty quote quote.


Sorry, I thought that was funny, but it is what I am talking about. There are 2 threads going on here, you mixed one with another. Factually there might be 3 now?

Respectfully, Dave

 

[Chadeaux]

Are you a bot? Any direct response is addressed as though it is an attack. You feel it okay to provoke, but when you are called out you whine.

Is any question or comment that doesn't fit into a narrow world view "provoking"? I think ive seen that accusation being leveled at other people. Do you wish for just everyone to agree with your brand of world view? Whining, not at all. Do I believe there is never a need to make personal comments in a discussion - yes. It's usually just a sign of someone's inability to enter into a meaningful discussion and done out of frustration at ones lack of ability. You see that a lot in the playground with children. Best.

Yep, bot. Nothing of any substance in this post either.

 

[Dano Sverige]

He's constantly knocked 10 bells out of you and others for 2 months now and forced you to paint yourselves into corners and lock threads to "save face"! That's "substance" to me.

 

[Dave44]

10 bells ! I like that, Thanks Dano!

What is this about locking threads? Why would that be good?

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Threads are not locked to save face, only mod or op can lock or have a thread locked.

Saying mods are locking it to save face would be considered an attack on mods, are you sure you want to go there?

 

[dieselram94]

Yes, I think you were one of those " provokes" weren't you? Funny how it is that the ones that talk the most about the constitution, freedoms, rights, god given, etc, etc are the first ones trying to shut down people's freedom to voice their thoughts and opinions. I guess those freedoms only exist if you buy into the correct world view. Funny how that happens.

That would be the liberal view...

 

[Chadeaux]

Stockpicker, you still haven't answered my questions in post 101 in this thread, so I'll repeat them:

Don't you agree that if even ONE U.S. citizen who wished to vote was deprived the right to do so, it would be a crime?

Isn't that why the voter protection laws were put into place in the south in the 1960's?

Isn't anyone voting more than once effectively depriving others of the right to vote by negating their vote?

 

[0121stockpicker]

Stockpicker, you still haven't answered my questions in post 101 in this thread, so I'll repeat them:

Don't you agree that if even ONE U.S. citizen who wished to vote was deprived the right to do so, it would be a crime?

Isn't that why the voter protection laws were put into place in the south in the 1960's?

Isn't anyone voting more than once effectively depriving others of the right to vote by negating their vote?

Sure completely agree voter fraud should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and is a terrible thing.

 

[0121stockpicker]

Stockpicker, you still haven't answered my questions in post 101 in this thread, so I'll repeat them:

Don't you agree that if even ONE U.S. citizen who wished to vote was deprived the right to do so, it would be a crime?

Isn't that why the voter protection laws were put into place in the south in the 1960's?

Isn't anyone voting more than once effectively depriving others of the right to vote by negating their vote?

Which is why if it was happening on a nation wide basis I would expect the Republican Party to launch the appropriate challenges and lawsuits to make sure that the correct results would be known - wouldn't you?

 

[dieselram94]

Which is why if it was happening on a nation wide basis I would expect the Republican Party to launch the appropriate challenges and lawsuits to make sure that the correct results would be known - wouldn't you?

Again what is the point when Obama commands the courts?

 

[0121stockpicker]

Again what is the point when Obama commands the courts?

Commands the courts ?? Last time I checked the court system was a separate leg of the 3 legged stool. And last time I checked the Supreme Court was not stacked with liberals.

Did bush command the courts when Florida ruled in favor of the republicans during that election??

 

[0121stockpicker]

Again what is the point when Obama commands the courts?

So you believe that the republican do have ample proof of fraud but just don't say anything because they believe they will not win the court case? That scenario seems suspect, don't you think??