Obama using computer-generated Twitterbots

Diesel,

Dozens of precincts reporting turnouts over 100%, dozens with not a single Romney vote all in key states....Military vote not being counted. It doesn't take much to steal an election, you only need voted fraud in the key swing states. Ohio
and Florida both had massive voter fraud...

So is the the Republican Party in on the Obama fraud? Why the silence? And meaningful fraud detected would have immediately triggered dozens and dozens of major well funded lawsuits? I'm not disagreeing about fraud, merely asking the obvious question which is why the Republican Party did mot do anything about it. These accusations are not new. Theyve been around since the election?
 

I have heard many people say that bringing to light massive fraud perpetrated on the American people could toss the populace into chaos, one of the sectors that would take a big hit is the markets.
I think that many on the right are scared of this scenario and ignore it while trying re-message themselves. The left cares not one wit. They act like they look forward to it. Much like one leader in another country is trying to usher in doomsday as he sees it. Hint-12th

When will we see anything that supports your thesis Stock? Do you just feel as if the omniscient power of your mind precludes any offers of proof by you? The internet is full of whatever argument you care to make, I know most of it is bull, but wouldn't it help you argue?
Thanks,
Dave
 

Last edited:
Whoa, no need to get personal - correct. I don't have an answer why the Republican Party has been silent on this issue. That is why I am asking the question.
 

Not trying to get personal, Sorry sometimes I act a little forcefully.

My point is that I would like you to act less the protagonist. The question is rife with assumptions, and it seems as if it is designed to try and reach a moral or mathematical high ground without actually making any point at all.

I actually hate that sort of non argument, There is a guy on a very successful show that usually acts obtuse to the point of outright stupidity to try an elicit a response that he can pounce on and use to promote himself.

Just saying so you know where I am coming from, I allow that everyone is intelligent enough to have an honest conversation and a real opinion. I do not like a dishonest conversation that plays on other views and designed for entrapment.

Hope I have not offended you, I freely give you this side of me so that you will know where I am coming from during further discourse.

Respectfully, Dave
 

Not trying to get personal, Sorry sometimes I act a little forcefully.

My point is that I would like you to act less the protagonist. The question is rife with assumptions, and it seems as if it is designed to try and reach a moral or mathematical high ground without actually making any point at all.

I actually hate that sort of non argument, There is a guy on a very successful show that usually acts obtuse to the point of outright stupidity to try an elicit a response that he can pounce on and use to promote himself.

Just saying so you know where I am coming from, I allow that everyone is intelligent enough to have an honest conversation and a real opinion. I do not like a dishonest conversation that plays on other views and designed for entrapment.

Hope I have not offended you, I freely give you this side of me so that you will know where I am coming from during further discourse.

Respectfully, Dave

A question is just a question no matter what your feelings are or why you think it was asked. And I think the question is an extremely legit one - dont you? if there was a tremendous amount of fraud in the last election why didnt the Romney campaign and the Republican Party immediate launch lawsuits across the country contesting the results in every state, county, etc, etc. I do not have the answer which is why I am asking the question
 

Well then, since the thesis cannot be proven until time and public information inquiries have been allowed we should start another thread that discusses the probability that the Reps have been infiltrated by the Prog party to the point of being ineffectual? You start the new thread and I promise I will help you kick it off. I will even name a few names! We can pour over policies and explore all the wonkish stuff there.

But the argument to the side does nothing to dispel the reality of nationwide voter fraud. In every swing state at the least, these are "isolated incidents" in your view but they do not need many votes to change an election.

Did you say that the Frankin election was debunked? Can you show me the links on that?( I read that somwhere on here, it may not have been you and for that I would readily apologize in advance)
 

Last edited:
Well then, since the thesis cannot be proven until time and public information inquiries have been allowed we should start another thread that discusses the probability that the Reps have been infiltrated by the Prog party to the point of being ineffectual? You start the new thread and I promise I will help you kick it off. I will even name a few names! We can pour over policies and explore all the wonkish stuff there.

But the argument to the side does nothing to dispel the reality of nationwide voter fraud. In every swing state at the least, these are "isolated incidents" in your view but they do not need many votes to change an election.

Did you say that the Frankin election was debunked? Can you show me the links on that?( I read that somwhere on here, it may not have been you and for that I would readily apologize in advance)

Franken election debunked - I have no idea what you are talking about.
 

Then Mr picker,, As stated I will withdraw my request for info as stated, And then I will ask you if you know how many votes Al Frankin won his senatorial campaign by. Why do you think it is or is not important?
 

Well then, since the thesis cannot be proven until time and public information inquiries have been allowed we should start another thread that discusses the probability that the Reps have been infiltrated by the Prog party to the point of being ineffectual? You start the new thread and I promise I will help you kick it off. I will even name a few names! We can pour over policies and explore all the wonkish stuff there.

But the argument to the side does nothing to dispel the reality of nationwide voter fraud. In every swing state at the least, these are "isolated incidents" in your view but they do not need many votes to change an election.

Did you say that the Frankin election was debunked? Can you show me the links on that?( I read that somwhere on here, it may not have been you and for that I would readily apologize in advance)

The thesis is proven by the fact that no legal challenges have been filed by the Romney campaign and or the RNC - correct? We know for a fact that they did not challenge the election.
 

Thesis not proven, Some freely feel they are above the fray, and afraid of the consequences if they raise a stink.

I am sure "moderate consultants" tell them they would permanently damage the office of the president if they contested a stolen election.
 

Thesis not proven, Some freely feel they are above the fray, and afraid of the consequences if they raise a stink.

I am sure "moderate consultants" tell them they would permanently damage the office of the president if they contested a stolen election.

But elections at every level are contested all the time. Recounts, hanging chads, inquiries into deceptive practices, etc, etc. so you believe that the Romney campaign would not have contested a fraudulently won election?
 

Diesel,

Dozens of precincts reporting turnouts over 100%, dozens with not a single Romney vote all in key states....Military vote not being counted. It doesn't take much to steal an election, you only need voted fraud in the key swing states. Ohio
and Florida both had massive voter fraud...

You said it way better than I could've! I agree totally. Some people only see what they want to....
 

You said it way better than I could've! I agree totally. Some people only see what they want to....

And does that include the Romney campaign and the RNC? Did they only see what they wanted to?
 

Yes Picker, I believe that. I am not sure he even cared about winning. And the previous candidate as well.

Remember Fred Thompson, He said I will be there if you want, if not I don't care, or something like that.

I do not think that side of the isle takes the countries problems seriously, you can see it in their non arguments,

Please get back to the question at hand, My thesis is beating up on your thesis :occasion14:.

Respectfully, Dave
 

Lower level elections, and usually by the kids on the left, Your premise is still losing.

Respectfully, Dave

Ps- response to Mr pickers # 91
 

Last edited:
Lower level elections, and usually by the kids on the left, Your premise is still losing.

Respectfully, Dave

Ps- response to Mr pickers # 91

I have no idea what you are talking about. Is a discussion about finding the truth not sure what you mean by wining / losing.

If you think the republicans are handing over elections to the democrats you certainly are entitled to that belief.
 

Please Mr Stocky,

Not long ago you were regaling all of us with your ability to use critical thinking to formulate your views. It looks as if you actually have to be lead there and then you claim it as deductive reasoning.

That does seem to be indicative of a larger problem in this country.

Dave44s next thesis; Will a few generations that never had to display their work cause problems for those of us who were not allowed to use a calculator.
Ready, Set, GOOOOO

Cheers, Dave
 

Just what are you getting at?

Diesel, I believe that if massive election changing fraud had been perpetrated in the last election that the Romney campaign and the RNC would have immediately launched numerous lawsuits across the country. I believe the republican campaign would be watching extremely closely for any meaningful fraud to occur. Given we did not hear a peep out of them I conclude that either 1 no election changing fraud occurred or 2 the Republican Party is in cahoots with the democrats and willingly allowed fraud to go unchecked.
 

Please Mr Stocky,

Not long ago you were regaling all of us with your ability to use critical thinking to formulate your views. It looks as if you actually have to be lead there and then you claim it as deductive reasoning.

That does seem to be indicative of a larger problem in this country.

Dave44s next thesis; Will a few generations that never had to display their work cause problems for those of us who were not allowed to use a calculator.
Ready, Set, GOOOOO

Cheers, Dave

Whoa dave is there any need to get personal with your responses? Do you feel that doing so helps you to make a point?
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom