Holyground
Hero Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2014
- Messages
- 579
- Reaction score
- 830
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Not in the can
- Detector(s) used
- Garrett AT GOLD, Garrett ATX
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Well HG, I'd have to say, I disagree, Everything has a beginning and a end. Even life it self or A day or night, And ones end is another's beginning. Most people don't even know there great grandfather's name, that's about a hundred years.
Thats about how long went by from the Old Jesuit order to the new Jesuit order. A lot of the Old Jesuits melted in to the Jewish Religion to hide from execution. The old ways were lost.
Wrmickel1
The apostolic succession started with Peter. Peter was Jewish. Judiasm has been in the Catholic Church from the beginning. The Pope today is a globalist, a Marxist, Socialist, ect. ect. Marx was Jewish. Judaism, or the "Jewish Religion" as you call it, is actually Talmudic. Marxism is from the Talmudic belief system in which Jews are the Superior race on the planet. The Jesuits, in their own eyes were supreme over all. The Jesuits did not "melt" into anything, especially the "Jewish Religion." They already were, from the beginning and they still are today. Just because it is all hidden from your eyes, doesn't make it untrue.
To get an idea of how the world would came to see the Jesuits, we have many examples from the Protestant point of view, as Englishman Giovanni Battista explained in 1876:
“In no other epoch of history, certainly, have the Jesuits been more dangerous and threatening for England than in the present. I am no alarmist. I refuse to believe that England will relapse under the Papal yoke, and return to the darkness and ignorance of the middle ages, because some scores of citizens pass over to the Romish communion; but at the same time I do believe that many bold and less reflective persons make too light of the matter, and are wrong in refusing to countenance vigorous measures, not for religious persecution, but to check the insolence and countermine the plots of these audacious monks. It is true that there exists a great difficulty in deciding what measures are to be adopted for accomplishing this end. It is repugnant, doubtless, to a liberal and generous mind, and it is unworthy of a free and great nation, to persecute any sect, and to make different castes in the same body of citizens. But it may fairly be asked, are monks, and especially Jesuits, really English citizens, in the strictest sense of the word? Do they recognize Queen Victoria as their legitimate sovereign? Are they prepared to yield a loyal obedience to the laws of the land? To all these questions I answer, No! Even when born in England, they do not consider themselves Englishmen. They claim the privileges which the name confers, but will not accept the obligations it imposes. Their country is Rome; their sovereign the Pope; their laws the commands of their General. England they consider an accursed land; Englishmen heretics, whom they are under an obligation to combat. The perusal of this work will, I imagine, prove beyond the possibility of contradiction that, from their origin, the Jesuits have constantly and energetically labored towards this object. I cannot too much impress upon the minds of my readers that the Jesuits, by their very calling, by the very essence of their institution, are bound to seek, by every means, right or wrong, the destruction of Protestantism. This is the condition of their existence, the duty they must fulfill, or cease to be Jesuits. Accordingly, we find them in this evil dilemma. Either the Jesuits fulfill the duties of their calling, or not. In the first instance, they must be considered as the bitterest enemies of the Protestant faith; in the second, as bad and unworthy priests; and in both cases, therefore, to be equally regarded with aversion and distrust.”
In History of the Jesuits: their Origin, Progress, Doctrines, and Designs, by Giovanni Battista. Published in 1876. Public Domain.
Does this sound a lot like a rant describing the "Wondering Jew" to you? I have read many such rants. All you need to do is replace the name Jesuit with that of adherents of Judaism, of the Zionist persuasion.
I don't usually get on this rant myself but to reply to your under researched reply and disagreement, while running the risk of being ostracized in a vitural cornacopia of ways, I answered you anyway. So prove me wrong before the politically correct ban me. By the way, do you know the definition of Politcally Correct? It's trying to pick up a dog turd by the clean end.
Oh yea, I know all of my Grand Father's names, going back to Ireland. The information is out there if you only take the time to find it.
Last edited: